Muller: Saab Bid "Serious As A Heart Attack"

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

At least now we know how Saab will die. But Spyker CEO Victor Muller’s unfortunate choice of metaphors isn’t the only indication in his interview with the WSJ Deal Journal that Saab will die on the operating table. Take, for example, his answer to the question “Why does Spyker want to buy Saab?”

Saab has 1,100 dealers world-wide. If we sold Spykers in just 5% of those dealers, we would be tripling our distribution base. Saab also has access to technologies that would be ideal for Spyker, such as an all-wheel drive system. Also, a company that should sell 100,000 cars a year has very high purchasing power and get parts cheaper than a company that wants to make 100 cars a year.

Emphasis on wants to make 100 cars per year (they sold fewer than 50 last year). And yet, somehow Muller “hopes to model a Saab acquisition after Audi’s successful take over of Lamborghini in 1997.” Except that Saab ain’t Lambo and Spyker ain’t exactly Audi. Meanwhile, Muller also seems to think that Saab can survive on “quirk” alone, and he does some confused back-pedaling on his racially-charged statements about Saab and Spyker. The saga continues.

When Deal Journal asks how Spyker could improve Saab, Muller’s answer shows the yawning divide between the ultra-limited-production boutique automaker mindset, and the realities of the (even niche) mass-market business.

Saab is being carved out of GM and will have to stand on its own legs. In order to do that, it will require a completely different state of mind in terms of entrepreneurship. We are very entrepreneurial company. We manage to create Spyker out of nothing. The company hadn’t been active for 75 years when we started in 2000. We bring experience and branding and sales. I design all of my cars. Saabs would benefit from design input to make Saabs more “Saabish.” You buy a Saab for a reason. It is quirky. It is different. If you wanted a car that looked like everyone else you would buy a Volkswagen.

Yes, but Volkswagen also has Seat and Skoda. Meanwhile, what economies of scale would Spyker-Saab enjoy? If Muller were buying Saab from a bunch of well-moneyed fanboys, he’d be set. Unfortunately, “difference” and “quirk” don’t sell cars on their own, let alone build up the volume needed to compete in the market. But no matter. “I’ve read that you want to save Saab out of a feeling of kinship to Sweden,” suggests Deal Journal.

The Swedes and Dutch are very small nations. I have always admired the Swedes for their entrepreneurial ways. They have been able to thrive in a hostile environment. Go to Stockholm now and your toes freeze off. They have made very strong brands in Volvo and Saab. We have something similar in Holland. We are used to dealing with the climate. When I heard that Saab, an iconic brand was in trouble, I felt very strongly that we should help them out.

Climate? Charity? Can we just pronounce Saab dead before Muller starts waving a shiny balloon in its face and swearing that it sees signs of life?


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Mpresley Mpresley on Dec 25, 2009

    Racially charged? Lighten up. Got an idea, let's all get together and hold hands, then select a "We Are The World" committee to design a car. It would have to be green, eco powered (whatever that means) have absolutely no character, but be heavily subsidized by the government. Except for insecure liberals who see "racism" and global doom and gloom everywhere, especially when they look in the mirror, who would want it? I'm sure you'd be first in line at the dealership? Not!

  • CyCarConsulting CyCarConsulting on Dec 26, 2009

    Put a Saab badge on all the Spykers and send them out to all the dealers. Problem solved.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next