Bailout Watch 565: Small Business Adminstration Dealer Bailout Grows

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Car dealers are some of the most politically connected people in America. As we reported yesterday, more than a few axed GM store owners demonstrated their political muscles by forcing the nationalized automaker to rescind their franchise terminations. Further back in time, we highlighted the Obama administration’s “stealth” dealer bailout: a car dealer-specific Small Business Administration (SBA) loan program. Under the program, the SBA guarantees 75 percent of a car dealer’s floor-plan line of credit, ranging from $500,000 to $2 million. The SBA’s network of private-sector lenders make the loans. In theory. In practice, it’s been what the Brits call a damp squib. Although Automotive News [AN, sub] fails to put any hard numbers to the program’s failure, they acknowledge that the SBA dealer deal “has had trouble attracting lender participation since its May launch.” Needless to say, the “answer” to the SBA lenders’ entirely understandable reticence/prudence is . . . bigger loans and more federal backing.

The House measure [passed yesterday by a 389-32 vote] would provide federal guarantees of as much as 90 percent on these loans through the end of September 2010 . . . The administration wants loan limits of $5 million and permanent federal guarantees of 90 percent.

To be fair, the higher limit will make the program much more attractive to cash-strapped dealers. Only 30 percent of American auto dealers have vehicle inventories worth less than $2 million, the current maximum line of credit available through the SBA.

Then again, let’s revisit the reason for the [relatively] low loan limit and the limited federal guarantee [via The Charlotte Business Journal].

[Associate administrator for the Office of Capital Access Eric] Zarnikow says the SBA decided to offer a lower guarantee on floor-plan loans because the agency has never made those types of loans before and didn’t want to take “undue risks” on a new, pilot program.

Also, to be honest, why are the feds “investing” in car dealers anyway? And what’s the cost of this program? I mean financially, not politically.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • AMXtirpated AMXtirpated on Oct 31, 2009

    If you've ever looked out a passenger jetliner window with a view of the wing during a takeoff or approach, if the meteorological conditions are right, you'll see pretty much the same thing - water vapor condensing in low pressure regions created by the passage of the aircraft. Either that, or this B-2's got a Hemi.

  • Carsncars Carsncars on Oct 31, 2009

    Like AMXtirpated said, Prandtl–Glauert singularities can happen at speeds significantly lower than the speed of sound, and should not be used as an indicator that an aircraft has broken the sound barrier.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next