Uncle Sam Eyes Vehicle Tracking Tax

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A Member of Congress proposes to use taxpayer money to fund the development of technology to track motorists as part of a new form of taxation. US Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon) introduced H.R. 3311 earlier this year to appropriate $154,500,000 for research and study into the transition to a per-mile vehicle tax system. The “Road User Fee Pilot Project” would be administered by the US Treasury Department. This agency in turn would issue millions in taxpayer-backed grants to well-connected commercial manufacturers of tolling equipment to help develop the required technology. Within eighteen months of the measure’s passage, the department would file an initial report outlining the best methods for adopting the new federal transportation tax.

“Oregon has successfully tested a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) fee, and it is time to expand and test the VMT program across the country,” Blumenauer said in a statement on the bill’s introduction. “A VMT system can better assess fees based on use of our roads and bridges, as well as during times of peak congestion, than a fee based on fuel consumption. It is time to get creative and find smart ways to rebuild and renew America’s deteriorating infrastructure.”

In 2006, the Oregon Department of Transportation completed its own study of how to collect revenue from motorists with a new form of tax that, like the existing fuel excise tax, imposes a greater charge on drivers the more that they drive. The pilot project’s final report summed up the need for a VMT tax.

“Unfortunately, there is a growing perception among members of the public and legislators that fuel taxes have little to do with road programs and therefore should be considered ‘just another form of taxation,'” the March 2006 report stated. “By itself, this situation appears to be preventing any increases in fuel tax rates from being put into effect.”

The money diverted from the fuel excise tax on non-road related projects must be made up for with a brand new VMT tax, the report argued. Merely indexing the gas tax to inflation or improvements in fleet gas mileage was rejected as “imprecise.” Instead, the report urged a mandate for all drivers to install GPS tracking devices that would report driving habits to roadside Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) scanning devices.

Blumenauer is a long-time advocate of bicycling and mass transit in Congress. Many of his largest campaign donors stand to benefit from his newly introduced legislation. Honeywell International, for example, is a major manufacturer RFID equipment. The company also happens to be the second biggest contributor in the current cycle to Blumenauer’s Political Action Committee (PAC), the Committee for a Livable Future. Another top-ten donor, Accenture, is a specialist in the video tolling field.

H.R. 3311 awaits a hearing in the House Ways and Means Committee. A copy of the bill is available in a 170k PDF file at the source link below.

HR 3311 (Congress of the United States, 9/14/2009)

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • CypressNut CypressNut on Sep 16, 2009

    Yet another attempt at wealth re-distribution. The assumption being, that the more you earn, the more you drive... But, who's looking out for the mobile taco stands? I am starting the MTT-PAC (Mobile Tasty Taco Political Action Comittee) and will lobby Congress against such a punitive tax against our members. Who knows, maybe I will get some free sausage/egg tacos for my troubles. CypressNut Founding Member, MTT-PAC

  • Roots549 Roots549 on Oct 01, 2009

    For years now, we would have had more electric or alternative fuel vehicles on the road, if our governments, state and fed, could have figured out an effective way to make up revenue lost to less gas being used. For the most part, this is about revenue. If people are making their own energy via solar, wind, whatever, then using that energy for transportation, the state is out revenue. The very survival of state bureaucracies is being threatened, so no alt energy concepts will thrive, until it can be managed efficiently, taxed enough. As for thousands of more devices tracking us, icing on the cake for those in power. We are nearing ruin, complete instability in our country. The US government is an entity hell bent on supporting themselves and their sponsors. If it were about the environment, we would see enormous subsidies on fuel efficient vehicles, off grid energy efforts, fantastic research grants. It's not about carbon, it's about money and the power of the state. There are many options on how individuals can work towards regaining liberties, don't expect any legit organization be in line, 100% with your personal beliefs, but find one that comes close and be active. Though I am not entirely supportive of their domestic agenda, campaignforliberty is who I throw some weight behind, trust them more than are status quo leadership.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next