Presidential Task Force on Automobiles Falls Into the Perception Gap

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

GM is so screwed. We are so screwed. On the occasion of Old GM’s judicial death sentence, Steve Rattner offered an instant analysis of what New GM needs to do to survive: eliminate the perception gap. “There’s often a lag between perception and reality,” the head of the Presidential Task Force on Automobiles (PTFOA) told jobbing journos. Automotive News [sub] puts it this way: “General Motors must convince consumers that the quality of its vehicles has improved to stop a decline in U.S. market share and survive after bankruptcy, a senior Obama administration official said. Steve Rattner, the head of the Treasury Department’s auto task force, said the quality of GM vehicles has improved, citing the Chevrolet Malibu as an example. But he added that consumers have to be made aware.”

1. Malibu schmalibu. In general, General Motors’ vehicles are still not as well-built as its class-leading competition. Check any long-term survey of quality, reliability, warranty claims, etc. Consumer Reports reports: “The reliability of many models still falls short.”

2. the “perception gap” is simply GM customers way of saying “we won’t get fooled again.” Do NOT accuse them of being stupid, however obliquely.

3. A comprehensive warranty is the single best way to eliminate this issue. So . . . where is it?

4. It’s not all about quality. Quality—a slippery term even amongst the carnoscenti—is a given in the auto industry these days. What’s needed here is branding. A relentless focus on a given brand’s unique selling point. For example, Audi’s haven’t been reliable since, uh . . . And yet they’re the up and coming luxury brand.

5. Rattner’s repetition of Detroit’s favorite meme is a bad, bad thing. He’s gone native.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Bunter1 Bunter1 on Jul 09, 2009

    "He’s gone native." Bullseye, RF. You can't change a culture by adopting it. Once President Goodwrench finds continued support of GM is a political liability C7 will be just around the corner. Sad. Bunter

  • RetardedSparks RetardedSparks on Jul 09, 2009

    If you've been batting .250 and want to get your average to .300, you can bat .299 forever and you won't get there. Can GM bat .400 for a few years straight? Doubt it.

  • Shipwright As my Avatar shows I had an '08 GT 500, Grabber Orange convertible. I now own a '12 GT 500 Kona Blue coupe.
  • ArialATOMV8 I tend to prefer more amusing colors when picking out a car (if possible). My 2017 Lexus RX is painted in a Nightfall Mica (Dark Blue) and I really dig the look. In the dealership it stands out compared to the regular tame blacks, silvers and whites. Soon I may be at the point to afford a new car and when I do, I'll do my part and spec/hunt for an allocation of a vibrant color.
  • Tassos Tim is not that good with colors.The bright "pink" is not pink, but FUCHSIA. Both colors may look good on a woman's sweater, but not on steel panels.
  • Tassos While I was a very satisfied owner of a much earlier Accord COupe 5 speed (a 1990 I owned from 1994 to 2016), I don't like the exterior styling of this one so much, in fact the 2017 sedan looks better. Or maybe it sucks in white. The interior of my 1990 was very high quality, this one looks so-so. The 157 k miles were probably easy highway miles. Still, Hondas are not Toyotas, and I remember the same service (like timing belt replacement) back then cost TWICE for an Accord than for a Camry. Add to this that it has the accursed CVT, and it's a no. Not that I am in the market for a cheap econobox anyway.
  • 3-On-The-Tree My 2009 C6 corvette in black looks great when it’s all washed and waxed but after driving down my 1.3 mile long dirt road it’s a dust magnet. I like white because dust doesn’t how up easily. Both my current 2021 Tundra and previous 2014 Ford F-150 3.5L Ecobomb are white
Next