Hammer Time: Die Brands! Die!

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

I’m sick and tired of all the GM crap. Four brands will die. Boo friggin’ hoo. Nobody seems to mention that virtually all the cars are either cannibalistic shitboxes or uncompetitive black holes. I won’t miss them. In fact, I wish GM would take a whole lot of other brands with them to the pit of liquidation. For starters . . .

Suzuki. I’m sorry. But any company that bases most of their line-up on cars even GM wouldn’t take deserves to die. Like most of the second tier, Suzuki has a grand total of one good car. The SX4. Other than that, it’s trashville. The XL7, Grand Vitara, Reno, Aerio, Forenza, Verona, and whatever Italian named pseudonym or pig in sweatsocks Suzuki has marketed over the past decade, has failed. Miserably. Completely. The last genuine hit Suzuki had was over 20 years ago with the Samurai and even that quickly bit the big one. For all I care, Suzuki can donate the SX4 and perhaps a Swift on the side to Subaru and fold up their tent.

Mitsubishi is another one that seems stuck in a time warp. Back in the early 90’s, the parent company was spending serious coin on getting this brand noticed. There was the landmark 1st gen Eclipse, and . . . well . . . I can’t remember. Oh, yeah! The Expo, Diamante, Galant, Precis (ouch!), Mirage, 3000GT and Montero. Some of these models were good fifteen years ago.

Today? Misubishi’s line-up is like Mercury without the Jill. Not a single vehicle offers anything competitive to the customer with the soul exception of the Evo. That doesn’t help since they sell only about 200 or so of those a month. As of now even the one- model MINI brand outsells Mitsubishi’s six model line-up for all of 2009 (eight if you include the Evo and Spyder). So, I say screw this rental car junket. Let Porsche have the Evo, let their derivative traders give it a decent interior and give the rest of the lineup a decent funeral.

Finally, I say Chrysler must die. No, not the entire company. Well, actually, yes. Eventually. But first I would start with the Chrysler brand. For a normal company, you would say that Chrysler now sells six distinct models. Aspen, PT Cruiser, Town & Country, Sebring, Sebring Convertible and the 300. But wait. What about all the 2008 Crossfires and Pacificas that have yet to find a home? What about the 2008 PT Cruiser? It may have been designed during the Clinton era. But apparently many of those will likely remain on sparingly visited auction lots well into 2010. In the dealer world those still count.

Personally, I just don’t see many of the other models making it out of wholesale heaven either. The Aspen’s the worst of the SUVs. The Sebring is the worst of the sedans. The Sebring convertible deserves to have a big “Made by Tonka” stamping on its dashboard. Since T&C minivans can now be had as a base minivan, and 300s can be given bare-bones interiors, I say what’s the point? Just kill the brand. Make one mediocre model instead of two terrible ones. Let Dodge take over the minivan and 300, and let the public be freed from a slew of unloved models that were made in Chuck E. Cheese hell.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Jun 04, 2009

    Do we really need Acura, Scion, Mistubishi, Isuzu, Kia and a soon to be parade of Chinese copy kat lead tainted junk? Opening the door on any of these cars reveals a smell akin to recyled chemical garbage which is enough to make me steer clear. GM should have eliminated Buick, Saturn, Saab and Hummer not Pontiac which is there only youth oriented performance division with a history of expressive designs that stood out from the ordinary Chevys.

  • Detroit-Iron Detroit-Iron on Aug 09, 2012

    Anyone else think of Sideshow Bob's tattoo "The, Bart, The"

  • Jkross22 Their bet to just buy an existing platform from GM rather than build it from the ground up seems like a smart move. Building an infrastructure for EVs at this point doesn't seem like a wise choice. Perhaps they'll slow walk the development hoping that the tides change over the next 5 years. They'll probably need a longer time horizon than that.
  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Next