Consumer Reports Issues Domestics-Only List. Why?

by Robert Farago

Published: January 6th, 2009

consumer reports issues domestics only list why

Automotive News [sub]: “The magazine normally recommends cars in its April issue. But it singled out eight Detroit 3 vehicles early because consumers may be concerned about reliability while General Motors and Chrysler LLC seek federal assistance, said David Champion, the magazine’s chief car tester. ‘We’re only about halfway through our testing, so it’s not a complete list,’ he said. ‘But because of the public interest, we thought it would be useful.”” Huh? Since when is it Consumer Reports’ job to allay consumer fears about the reliability of the products produced by a small group of automakers, especially in response to an industry-wide event? In other words, why the special treatment? Even if it’s all about catering to a public need– remembering that Consumer Reports is a non-profit organization and there is no statistical data to support this position– CR’s special issue increases the psychological polarization between domestic and import-branded vehicles. And that’s not a good thing– for the domestics. If nothing else, the D2.8’s abject inability to identify the difference between quality relative to each other and quality compared to the wider car market has contributed to their failure. Anyway, the “winners” in the gallery below and/or after the jump.

“Consumer Reports named the V-6 Chevrolet Malibu LTZ as its top-rated Detroit 3 vehicle and also selected the Cadillac DTS. The other six winners were Ford Motor cars: the Ford Fusion SEL and Mercury Milan Premier, Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable, and Lincoln MKZ and Ford Taurus X. No Chrysler vehicles were recommended.”

See what I mean?

Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 41 comments

Lokki on Jan 06, 2009
"I can see a rationale behind the story. Right now, you can get some really big bargains on many of these cars. CR’s mission is to help you get value, and there are likely a lot of CR readers thinking about going for one of these deals right now. Knowing which ones to avoid would be good info." I agree with Landcrusher. I also think that it's a good marketing gimmick for them too as the news is guaranteed to pick up the list and mention CR's name. That's free advertising, folks. As for CR itself, yeah, I still subcribe but every month I wonder why I do. I would prefer to only get their web version, and skip the paper since there's nothing to read it the magazine. Ever since Bose sued their pants off years ago, they're afraid to publish their testing methods and that was the only interesting thing to read in the rag. Their current value? Only in generating statistical reports on reliability, which is being over taken by True Delta et al. As for helping to choose products their reports are of little value. One of the things I stumbled across in their Site is a blog where readers were complaining that CR won't provide any tests on mattresses... CR's answer was that it's too hard for them to do. Ok.... then why do we need CR?

Like Reply
Davey49 on Jan 07, 2009

The CTS was deemed too unreliable to be recommended. Otherwise it scores pretty high CTS- 84 points out of 100 STS- 77 points The Lambdas score 74 points All are unreliable CR to me is by far the best place to read auto reviews. Because they don't focus so much on "performance" and track times but will tell you if you're going to bump your head every time you pick something out of the trunk. Plus they don't do brakestand starts so acceleration runs are more realistic. Lokki- you obviously didn't read the mattress blog or you would know the reason why.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Rover Sig 2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited, like my previous JGC's cheap to keep (essentially just oil, tires) until recent episode of clunking in front suspension at 50K miles led to $3000 of parts replaced over fives visits to two Jeep dealers which finally bought a quiet front end. Most expensive repair on any vehicle I've owned in the last 56 years.
Bob Hey Tassos, have you seen it with top down. It's a permanent roll bar so if it flips no problem. It's the only car with one permanently there. So shoots down your issue. I had a 1998 for 10 years it was perfect, but yes slow. Hardly ever see any of them anymore.
3-On-The-Tree 2007 Toyota Sienna bedsides new plugs, flat tire on I-10 in van Horn Tx on the way to Fort Huachuca.2021 Tundra Crewmax no issues2021 Rav 4 no issues2010 Corolla I put in a alternator in Mar1985 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ60 280,000mi I put in a new radiator back in 08 before I deployed, did a valve job, new fuel and oil pump. Leaky rear main seal, transmission, transfer case. Rebuild carb twice, had a recall on the gas tank surprisingly in 2010 at 25 years later.2014 Ford F159 Ecoboost 3.5L by 80,000mi went through both turbos, driver side leaking, passenger side completely replaced. Rear min seal leak once at 50,000 second at 80,000. And last was a timing chain cover leak.2009 C6 Corvette LS3 Base, I put in a new radiator in 2021.
ChristianWimmer 2018 Mercedes A250 AMG Line (W177) - no issues or unscheduled dealer visits. Regular maintenance at the dealer once a year costs between 400,- Euros (standard service) to 1200,- Euros (major service, new spark plugs, brake pads + TÜV). Had one recall where they had to fix an A/C hose which might become loose. Great car and fun to drive and very economical but also fast. Recently gave it an “Italian tune up” on the Autobahn.
Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^