Toyota UK MD: Recovery Could Take Five Years

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Even Detroit’s fiercest defenders allow that The Big 2.8 should have thought a little further ahead than a single financial quarter– although they’re sure that Wall Street’s responsible for the shorter-termism. Hey! Anyone remember when Cerberus said they’d be better owners for Chrysler than anyone ’cause they didn’t have to report to Wall Street? You know: we’re quick! Less bureaucracy! More selling! Turn on a dime! Well, a dime’s about all they have left and former ToMoCo Prez Jim Press has dibs on that bad boy. Anyway… even though Toyota isn’t $30b in debt, the Japanese automaker is in full crisis mode. Yesterday, the Prius plant plotzed and they shit-canned executive bonuses. Today, we hear that the diesel engine project with Isuzu is DOA– minus the “OA.” You know that $1m ho’ down the Toyota used to throw for its dealers in Sin City? Gone. Seriously, talk all you want about misplaced Tundras, but these guys don’t dance this mess around. Just-auto {sub] reports that Toyota’s UK Managing Director reckons it could be as long as five years before the automaker’s biz recovers to last year’s level. “We have our forecasts for the next 24 months,” Miguel Fonseca revealed. “But it is very difficult to forecast further. After two years I think there will be a slow recovery, but my own belief is that it will be five years before we are back where we were.” And here’s something The Big 2.8 might have said, I dunno, ten years ago…

“We have to adjust our cost base to this new reality.” At the same time, ToMoCo UK plans to pursue the same-old core business plan– while eating someone’s lunch.

“These difficult market conditions will be an opportunity for us to gain market share as other manufacturers weaken but our total sales are not likely to increase… This will make cars more accessible and protect dealer profit margins rather than discounting. We will not push volume, but we will protect our dealer network. That is our key role.”

What’s the best Toyota NA is thinking along the exact same lines?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Porschespeed Porschespeed on Dec 16, 2008

    63CorvairSpyder, True enough. To me that points to the larger issue- a failed model. Most dealers I know make darn good money (they deal foreign), but they do really have a lot of (to me) useless overhead - so it's no surprise that somebody has to fund that. GM (or anybody) buys a boatload of power window motors for like $7 each. When you go to the dealer, it'll cost you $95. Easy. Lotsa overhead that has to be funded on the corporate level. Just the way the current system is structured. It could be a helluva lot easier and cheaper, but that will take further shaking out.

  • Musah Musah on Dec 17, 2008

    Makes me wonder what jim press is thinking right now. Remained with toyota chance of being in employment for foresable future . At chrysler oh no. Or what i'm i missing?

  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
Next