GMAC: Free At Last!

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Co-dependent relationships are never pretty, and they usually end only when one half ends up in prison, the poorhouse or the morgue. With GM seemingly headed towards all three at once, its once-captive credit arm, GMAC, swears it will no longer play Tina to the General’s Ike. Automotive News [sub] quotes GMAC CFO Robert Hull as saying his firm plans to “shift GMAC from its captive roots to an independent deposit-funded lender and servicer.” As we reported earlier, changing GMAC’s status to a “Bank holding corporation” will give it access to the $700b TARP fund, but it also means that GM will have to exit the building. As in sell off its remaining 49 percent so that GMAC can rejoin society as a full-service bank, complete with FDIC insurance, credit cards, and a little dish of Werthers Originals by each teller. So GMAC will get taxpayer-funded security, and GM might even get a little cash out of the deal… but who loses? Why, the dealers, of course!

Staying alive until the TARPing comes has been job one at GMAC of late. To keep chugging towards the taxpayer-powered light at the end of the tunnel, GMAC has stopped leasing altogether, raised its credit requirements, and cut its loan volume dramatically. These measure have lead GM dealers to believe that GMAC is no longer there for them, as most customers no longer qualify for the lender’s beefed-up loan terms. To the point where Barclay’s analyst Brian Johnson claims that GM sales suffered last month because the automaker “wasn’t able to use GMAC financing to close the deal with its prospective buyers.” Now it seems that there’s a rumor circulating among GM dealers that GMAC is preparing to pull lines of floorplan credit from the one-third of its dealer clients with the lowest credit ratings. Though GMAC has already raised its floorplan interest rates, a spokesperson for the company says it is not planning a floorplan yank. Yet.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Autonut Autonut on Nov 10, 2008

    Well, it does not matter what Wagoner done. I believe that there are plenty execs who crossed the proverbial line. FBI already stated that there are no plans to prosecute anyone due to high cost and low probability of conviction. In addition, they simply don't have resource to do that. It cost less and brings more glamor to chase obese, aged Italian dons for breaking toes of gambling degenerates, then ridding financial and corporate system from billion dollar felons.

  • Cleek Cleek on Nov 10, 2008
    autonut : November 10th, 2008 at 3:55 pm Well, it does not matter what Wagoner done. I believe that there are plenty execs who crossed the proverbial line. FBI already stated that there are no plans to prosecute anyone due to high cost and low probability of conviction. In addition, they simply don’t have resource to do that. It cost less and brings more glamor to chase obese, aged Italian dons for breaking toes of gambling degenerates, then ridding financial and corporate system from billion dollar felons. Reduce that to a bumper sticker and you'll sell millions.
  • Sayahh I do not know how my car will respond to the trolley problem, but I will be held liable whatever it chooses to do or not do. When technology has reached Star Trek's Data's level of intelligence, I will trust it, so long as it has a moral/ethic/empathy chip/subroutine; I would not trust his brother Lore driving/controlling my car. Until then, I will drive it myself until I no longer can, at which time I will call a friend, a cab or a ride-share service.
  • Daniel J Cx-5 lol. It's why we have one. I love hybrids but the engine in the RAV4 is just loud and obnoxious when it fires up.
  • Oberkanone CX-5 diesel.
  • Oberkanone Autonomous cars are afraid of us.
  • Theflyersfan I always thought this gen XC90 could be compared to Mercedes' first-gen M-class. Everyone in every suburban family in every moderate-upper-class neighborhood got one and they were both a dumpster fire of quality. It's looking like Volvo finally worked out the quality issues, but that was a bad launch. And now I shall sound like every car site commenter over the last 25 years and say that Volvo all but killed their excellent line of wagons and replaced them with unreliable, overweight wagons on stilts just so some "I'll be famous on TikTok someday" mom won't be seen in a wagon or minivan dropping the rug rats off at school.
Next