New McLaren P11 Supercar To Be Made Of Clay?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The autoblogosphere is on fire with talk of the CAR Magazine’s photos of the McLaren P11. The mid-engined F430-fighter has had a tough development so far, and McLaren is probably trying to get some positive coverage for its ambitious project by leaking images to CAR. But we, the chattering enthusiasts, have to ask ourselves what we’re getting so excited about. Though CAR has “Photoshop experts” to confirm that the images are “real” many bloggers have failed to report that the images are of a clay model. No mirrors, door handles or any other street-legalizing kit is shown on the models, meaning many changes are still to come. Also, CAR reports (on the third page in) that the “early styling buck” pictured has yet to receive treatment from recently-hired ex-Fiat styling chief Frank Stephenson. This means the production model should (if Stephenson is to earn his money) look considerably different than what is currently being shown. And then there’s the issue of the motor. Mercedes is playing silly buggers with McLaren, refusing to hand over the AMG 6.2 liter V8 that McLaren wants, possibly due to an Aston-Martin engine deal. In other words, we know basically nothing about the P11. It may not be what you want to hear, but dammit, it’s the truth.



Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Argentla Argentla on Oct 14, 2008

    Remember the old SNL commercial for the Adobe? "The little car that's made outta clay!"

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next