By on January 4, 2005

The news embargo on the new Dodge Charger helped avoid enthusiasts' ire. Before you read this editorial, you must first agree not to show it to anyone until next Tuesday. Yeah, right. And yet carmakers routinely provide new product news and photographs to the press subject to a mutually agreed release date. The industry calls the practice a "news embargo". It's the dirty little secret that lies at the heart of the relationship between automakers and the press.

It's easy to understand why automakers love a good embargo: a carefully-timed news blackout is the key to coordinating a vehicle's public debut– from tease to reveal to nationwide campaign. If the general public hears about a new car too early, the thrill of the new strangles the sales of the old. If an upcoming product's particulars arrive too late, valuable marketing momentum is lost. The news embargo significantly decreases the automakers' risk of blowing their big bucks product launches.

The now infamous, embargo-breaking shot of the '06 Corvette Z06.By their very nature, the news embargo also limits negative buzz. Think of it this way: if loose lips sink ships, an embargo can help keep a leaky ship afloat. Equally important, the blackout extends to "third parties", so the press can't reveal new model information to outside experts. When the embargo ends and the story breaks, the public receives only the manufacturer's details/photographs (along with a bit of editorially neutral background). Later, well, who cares? The damage has not been done.

Compare the early coverage given the new Dodge Charger with later, less widespread reports chronicling muscle car aficionados' outrage at the new Charger's four-door design. By sitting on Dodge's concept sketches as instructed, the automotive press helped guarantee a positive result for DCX, and a negative one for Charger purists.

Not slow, needs snow. Members of the motoring media perpetuate the embargo system because they figure if they don't play ball, they'll be locked out of the ballpark. This justification was brought into sharp focus last December. When embargoed pictures of the new Corvette Z06 suddenly appeared on-line, GM dispatched two Securitas goons to threaten an offending webmaster. Autoweek reported on the intimidation, ran the 'Vette pic, and clarified their position on news embargos: "We won't be the first to break an embargo, but neither will we be the last".

Of course, Autoweek and their ilk realize that the web threatens the status quo– even if dozens of websites responded to GM's threats by pulling the Z06 pictures off-line. While the mainstream automotive press is not about to tell carmakers to stick their news embargos up their figurative tail pipes, they're more than happy to let the newbies chip away at the system. Rest assured: if the new electronic media can get away with embargo running, the old guard will be right behind them; ready, willing and able to capitalize on their competitors' bravery.

   DVX offered T-TAC an embargoed story on the SRT-8. We declined.Fortunately, the news embargo is under attack from other quarters. These days, scoop hunters like Brenda Priddy and John Johnson prowl the Las Vegas desert and German Nürburgring, capturing photos of future models. The publication of these spy shots, and the increasing use of Photoshop to generate computer models based the images, are positive signs that the automotive PR guys no longer call all the shots. But the corporate communicators are nothing if not resilient. They've responded to the sneak attacks with an advanced embargo technique called the "private press preview".

For example, a few months ago Saturn presented its upcoming models to selected automotive writers. Journalists emerged from the hush-hush happening suitably enthused about the company's new design and engineering direction. But an embargo left the hacks unable to talk about Saturn's future products in any detail– aside from the "happy days are here again" party line.

Although Saturn PR sold the embargoed event as background, it was clearly designed to stem the flood of criticism directed at GM's faltering division. And it worked; the debate about Saturn's tired product range has gone quiet. This despite the fact that there's no guarantee that the previewed cars will make it into production, or that they'll be any good if they do.

Of course, the news embargo only persists because it's a win – win situation for the players involved. The manufacturers get to manipulate the news, while the press knows they'll never be out of the loop. Equally important, by keeping more aggressive journalists away from the master's table, embargos perpetuate and maintain the power of the buff book boys' club.

The only real loser is the general public. News embargos restrict the free flow of timely, unbiased information. They also muddy the journalistic waters, denying interested enthusiasts a vigorously independent automotive press. To rectify the situation, all automotive publications should refuse to agree to any news embargo, no matter how tempting such 'scoop insurance' may be. It's our policy, and it should be theirs.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


No Comments on “Embargo This!...”

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Re: 2017 Dodge Challenger GT: Fun in the Snow With a Little Less Go

    danio3834 - Last winter, I took a 2016 Chrysler 300S AWD to compete in a Rally Cross Ice Race. In the non-studded AWD class of 11 cars, I...
  • Re: Maybe Ford’s Not so Bad? Ex-CEO Mulally in Running for Secretary of State

    mtmmo - *YAWN* You’re a bore ass.
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    Jeff Zekas - Last time I hitched was in the late 70’s. Only one bad ride, a gay guy making passes. After the killing of the nurse in Santa Barbara, lots of folks stopped...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    la834 - The first time I ever heard the word “hitchhike” was when a third-grade teacher told us on the first day of school that year of his summer adventures,...
  • Re: Maybe Ford’s Not so Bad? Ex-CEO Mulally in Running for Secretary of State

    mikein541 - I’d rather he be considered for Sec Def. Marine Generals are fine as members of Joint Chiefs of Staff, but...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    JohnTaurus_3.0_AX4N - I have never set out with the intention of hitching a ride. I have accepted rides from strangers, like a young woman in an Omnrizon with two little boys...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    mikein541 - I’m 70 years old. As a young teenager growing up just outside Washington DC, my buddies and I hitched everywhere, when we weren’t riding our bicycles....
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    mshenzi - Hitchiked a ton in the early 1980s, during 18 months of bumming around East, Central and Southern Africa. Got picked up by all kinds of folks– local Africans...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    krhodes1 - That’s pretty funny! I have never hitched in the US, though I did pick up a couple of hitchhikers in college – I’ve always had a car. But I...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    7402 - Used to both hitch and give rides back in the 1970s-1980s. That ended in the summer of ’82 when I got picked up on PCH by 3 guys and a girl in an old Dodge...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Seth Parks, United States
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Kyree Williams, United States