C55 AMG Review

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

I swear I had no intention of performing a drifting demonstration outside my step-daughter's school gates. In a prior attempt to gain a little mid-corner throttle control, I'd switched off the computerized handling Nanny. And then forgot all about it. So when I attempted to merge with the after-camp traffic, I suddenly found myself laying down a good 20 feet of rubber, in a decidedly sideways fashion.

Needless to say, that was not an example of driving in the traditional Mercedes manner. One wafts in one's Merc. But let's face facts: the C-Class appeals to a younger, thrustier demographic. Turning a plain Jane C into a demented German hot rod can't piss away the model's air of emotionally reserved exclusivity– it never had any in the first place. So it's damn the brand, full speed ahead!

And speed there is, aplenty. The C55 holsters a 5.5-liter V8. The heavily modified powerplant generates a staggering 349hp, accompanied by an equally epic 376ft.-lbs. of torque at 4000rpms. Translation: AMG's mini-Merc is never, ever short of grunt. Grunt as in shove. Shove as in The Hand of God smacking you in the ass and sending you on your merry way.

To put some numbers to it, zero to 60 takes 4.9 seconds, with a top end well beyond the 155mph electronic speed limiter. To put an image to it, my impromptu tail sliding came complete with expletives and opposite lock.

LOTS of opposite lock. Despite its enormous accelerative abilities and diminutive footprint, the Mercedes C55 is no track-honed BMW M3. It's a muscle car writ small. The C55's rack-and-pinion steering system offers a leisurely 3.3 turns from lock-to-lock. The fact that you can have any gearbox you like so long as it's an automatic confirms the car's "horsepower uber alles" bias.

Of course, AMG has done their level best to make the C55 corner its level best. Affalterbach's satanic mechanics have modified and tuned the C's multi-link suspension to create firm, flat and fair cornering. The car hunkers down on seriously sticky 18" Pirelli P-Zero low profile tires. And its enlarged perforated brakes are almost powerful enough to stop time itself.

Put it all together and you've got a German pocket rocket that can negotiate bends at fantastic speeds with only a trace of initial body roll. Oh, and one small concern: that flashing triangle on the speedo warning you that power and grip are going their separate ways. Again, you can disable the death defying gizmo, steer with your right foot and take your chances. But even then, the computer retains the right to have the last say (excepting your insurance company). Trust me, it's no bad thing.

The comfort penalty exacted by this elevated body control is not as large as you'd think– at least until you crash into your first pothole. In fact, the C55's duality, its ability to cruise serenely yet mug a corner and murder a straight, raises an important question. Why the Hell aren't all Mercedes AMG?

The query comes into sharp focus the moment you lower yourself into the car's cabin. Unlike most modern MB products, the C55's cockpit is superbly constructed. From the meaty satisfaction of the leather-wrapped steering wheel, to the way the glove box lid snicks home, the controls and amenities feel like those found in Mercs of old: precise and durable. The doors shut with the time-honored bank vault thunk.

The fit and finish is far better than we've come to expect; especially considering the fact that the donor car is sold largely on the basis of its reasonable monthly payments. Rattles and squeaks are notable only by their absence. The Nappa leather seats are only slightly softer than an Amish church pew, but let's chalk that one up to low mileage. Like the rest of the car– especially the monster engine– you get the impression that the C55's chairs will only improve with age.

Unfortunately, the taste police failed to patrol the perimeter. While I'm a big fan of AMG's current wheels– they signal the car's mechanical strength with complete clarity of purpose– I'm not so sure about the rest of the body mods. The C55's side skirts, boot spoiler, meshed grill, etc. smack of back street tuning. An owner aspiring to The Fast and Furious look would have to do… nothing much. The car wash guys love it, but it doesn't say $55k to me.

Yes, that's right, $55k. That's a whole lot of money to pay for a car that looks like a car that costs $27k. The depreciation must be killer. Yes, but… for some of us, driving a dull car depreciates the soul. Get behind the wheel of the Mercedes Benz C55 and I guarantee you'll live fast and die old.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next