Sportscar Addiction

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

I can just about change a tyre, but that's it. I don't mind admitting it here, but stranded by the roadside, I'm paralysed by automotive machismo. When Spanner Man sticks his head into the engine bay, points and says 'There's your trouble!' I nod. I have no idea what he's talking about. I'd rather clip a jump lead on my right nipple than admit my ignorance. Still, I'm not in denial. Something's wrong and someone knows what it is. All that's left is the hassle, delay and a hit on my credit card that makes filling a Murcielago with Super-Unleaded seem like a bargain.

I just wish someone could have warned me, you know, before. When it comes to performance cars, an ounce of prevention is worth 1120 kgs of immovable TVR. In fact, I reckon the government should force TVR to put a warning label on their product: 'Warning: This Car Breaks'. Not that it would work. Even a sticker proclaiming 'Driving this Car Can Lead Directly to a Tree' wouldn't put off members of The Cult of Unbridled Horsepower. Once they hear a TVR's burble and roar- a sound that will one day cough, splutter and die- they have less reasoning ability than an Irish Setter on heat.

Of course, I shouldn't pick on TVR; the fact that the Chimaera tailed the last J D Power survey is neither here nor there. Every sports car has its drawbacks. Porsches are so reliable NASA is thinking about sending one to Mars. Yes, but what about the money? Drive your 'everyday supercar' faster than a speeding bullet and you'll spend £2000 a year on tyres, and five times that on depreciation. Unless you're something in The City, that's gotta hurt. If you are something in The City, you'll be spending your day making money, wishing you were in the country, blasting down on a winding Welsh road in your Porsche. Either way, you pay.

Even if you've got the time and money, you've got to face the problem of addiction. Drive your M3 enough and you'll be hooked worse than beagle on Marlboro. You won't be happy driving anything else. Happy? You'll be in Hell. You'll spend the entire trip to Legoland in the MPV trying to justify an M5, RS4 or some other car capable of inflicting three G's on your genetic progeny. Leave the country and it gets worse. You'll be pottering along, driving some disposable rental, thinking, 'If I was in my car, I'd be enjoying myself.'

Some people try to avoid trouble by owning two cars. This 'something for the weekend Sir?' approach is as strategically sound as invading Kuwait and threatening to cut off half of the world's oil supplies. Pistonheads inevitably choose a second car that's old and decrepit, or new and stupid. Thanks to the temporal demands of DIY, childcare, TV and alcohol, the spare car is used less than the EQ buttons on a car stereo. Golden oldies like a Dino or Aston need weekly running between total restorations. That means the frustrated owner spends all his time coaxing his car to life, or watching it being loaded on or off a transporter, rather than driving it, when it breaks down from neglect.

New cars like the Caterham 7 Superlight R or Ariel Atom are a far more sensible proposition- if you're the kind of person who likes to invest in lunar colonies. There's more chance of the moon lining up with Saturn, Mars, Jupiter and Uranus than a convergence of free time, perfect weather, open road and fully functional machine. Not to mention the fact that the weekend driver is jumping out of something resembling an average car into something very much like the kind of machine teenagers with lightning fast reflexes drive on closed circuits, for money. It's fun, fun, fun 'til the paramedics take the pistonhead away.

So, what's the answer? There isn't any. Identify which trouble best suits your nature, go the gym and practice shrugging your shoulders. Either that or forget about sports cars. Buy something so boring you never even think about driving. The funny thing is, when you pass some miserable bastard by the side of the road in his fancy sports car, you still won't be happy. You'll be remembering that glorious moment when Spanner Man set you back on your way, restoring your faith in cars and a merciful God. Face it: you're an incurable addict and pig-headed optimist. There's your trouble.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next