2019 BMW 3 Series Carries on the Tradition, but Leaves a Manual Transmission in the Past

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The car’s everything you’d expect a next-generation German sports sedan to be. Lighter, slipperier, more efficient, and slightly larger in footprint. Handling dynamics are reportedly improved — a requirement that, if missed, might necessitate the need for nationwide group therapy.

It still looks like a BMW 3 Series, too, as wary designers employed at German luxury marques aren’t known for their overt craziness, Chris Bangle notwithstanding. But tradition, while seemingly intact in this next-gen 3 Series, goes out the window the minute you search for transmission options.

Call it a case of the purist bubble obscuring real-world demand, but BMW’s decision to offer the 3 Series without a manual transmission option in the United States has enthusiasts up in arms. The brand clearly did so for a reason, though. Three-pedal availability has dwindled rapidly in the BMW stable as take rates plummet.

A BMW spokesman confirmed to Jalopnik that the absence of a stick in just-released media materials was because, “The manual is only available on smaller engine variants…that we do not get in the U.S.”

“We only have confirmation of the 330i, 330e and M340i models coming to the U.S.,” the spokesperson continued when pressed. “There are no current plans for lesser hp variants.”

What American buyers do receive, at least for now, is two engines — a turbocharged four-cylinder and inline-six — all mated to an eight-speed Sport Steptronic automatic with launch control. Offering either model wouldn’t have made either model faster, the BMW spokesman implied, as this tranny’s wider gear spread moves the vehicle quicker off the line. That doesn’t help the rare traditionalist buyer who just wants to row his or own gears, but what can you do? Your congressman doesn’t care.

For 2019, the 3 Series dons a new modular platform (in use by the 5 and 7 Series) that increases overall body stiffness by 25 percent, BMW claims. Body weight drops by up to 121 pounds, depending on model, while wheelbase and front and rear tracks increase by 1.6, 1.7, and 0.9 inches, respectively. Overall length grows 2.9 inches, width by 0.6 inches, and height by half an inch. Weight distribution is 50:50. Meanwhile the model’s coefficient of drag drops to 0.23 from the previous generation’s 0.26, aiding highway fuel economy. Front air curtains and a nearly sealed underbody help in this regard.

In the interest of a flatter ride and less upset, an new continuously variable damping system adds extra hydraulic cushioning at the front and compression limiting at the rear. Lift-related damping also appears on the M Sport suspension. This setup sees the vehicle sit 0.4 inches lower than its standard sibling, with firmer springs and thicker anti-roll bars aiding tossability. BMW claims a 20 percent increase in damping force during fast compression and rebound comes with the M Sport suspension. While either of these setups should satisfy most drivers, BMW offers Adaptive M, bringing electronically controlled dampers on board, as well as three drive modes.

Either of the latter two suspensions can be had with an M Sport rear differential. This differential, which snatches power away from the inside wheel in turns with greater finesse, should overcome the vehicle’s tendency to oversteer during rapid direction changes.

As we said before, power comes in two flavors. 330i and 330i xDrive models see a turbo 2.0-liter making 255 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque — an increase of 7 hp and 37 lb-ft over the engine’s predecessor. Aided by the weight loss and rejigged tranny, the 330i should complete a sprint to 60 mph in 5.6 seconds. In the M340i models, a twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six generates 382 hp and 369 lb-ft. Zero to 60 should pass in 4.2 seconds, Bimmer claims, though that figure isn’t yet set in stone.

Aesthetically, you’ll be able to tell the 2019 3 Series from its predecessor by revamped headlights (an evolution of what came before) and a twin-kidney grille with a single chrome surround. Actually, it won’t always be chrome. Select M Sport as a trim line (the other options are the de-facto Sport and Luxury), and the grille goes gloss black, with lower front and rear fascias and side sills undergoing an aggressive styling treatment. The Luxury trim line adds an extra heaping of a certain shiny material no high-zoot sedan can do without.

Out back, L-shaped LED taillights add further inches to the car’s perceived width, and bumper and tailpipe treatments change depending on which trim line the buyer choses. Along the flanks, Bimmer added athleticism via an upward-sweeping lower character line that accentuates a slight rear fender bulge — something that’s far more noticeable when viewed from the rear. The previous-gen car’s strong upper character line is split in two in this model, with one arcing aft from the front fender to the beltline, and a new, slightly lower one tracing just above the rear wheel well.

It’s not worth going into all the interior improvements, except to say you’ll be given more choice in materials, and middle rear-seat passenger won’t fidget as much. Rear legroom grows four-tenths of an inch. Oh, and there’s a bare minimum of 10 speakers, with 16-speaker Harman Kardon surround audi as an option.

Centered in the dash is an 8.8-inch touchscreen, with a 5.7-inch digital instrument display staring you in the face. However, if glitzy screens make you instinctively reach for your wallet, there’s a digital cockpit on offer. In this guise, a 12.3-inch screen serves as your instrument cluster, while a 10.25-inch touchscreen running the iDrive 7.0 operating system handles infotainment and navigation duties.

Accessing certain functions and settings while keeping your hands on the wheel can be as easy as barking instructions at the car. BMW’s Intelligent Personal Assistant, which debuts on this vehicle, is just like it sounds, responding to “Hey, BMW!” Your digital helper learns as it goes, and improves itself via OTA updates sent from the automaker.

Exhausted yet? You’ll have time to recover. The 2019 3 Series doesn’t arrive at dealers until March 2019. Pricing starts at $40,250 (plus $995 destination) for a base 330i, with xDrive all-wheel drive adding an extra two grand. M340i models appear next spring, with pricing announced closer to the release date. There’ll also be a new plug-in hybrid version, plus the necessary M3, but Bimmer isn’t giving out all info in one fell swoop.

[Images: BMW Group]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Hummer Hummer on Oct 03, 2018

    It's a good looking car, but it cements in my mind - my decision to buy my Tremec manual SS sedan, it's the BMW of yore... just a lot cheaper to run.

  • Focal Focal on Oct 29, 2018

    All automatics feel the same to me and losing the three pedals makes me look elsewhere. All brands are in play and i've driven BMW for so many years now. I have a F30 RWD 328i 6MT. Rare in Canada and I'll drive it a lot longer now. The Genesis G70 looks amazing inside and still has the stick. Good choice, but I'd also be happier with a Golf 4motion wagon than an auto BMW. If I'm going auto, I'll go all the way to electric. I'm so happy that I broke the bank and picked up a GT4 3 years ago. That's a life time car to own.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next