Musk's Tesla U-turn Prompted by Annoyed Saudis and Fearful Fans, Despite Interest From Volkswagen: Reports

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Friday night’s not-so-surprising move by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in which he wheeled around his plan to take the company private like an angry father cutting short a family vacation, has many angles.

First and foremost is the money factor, which matters more than anything else in this drama. According to two new reports, money eventually became available, just not from the sources we were led to expect. And not from sources Musk wanted.

According to the Wall Street Journal, green-seeking auto giant Volkswagen wanted a piece of Tesla’s action. After Musk’s team of assembled bankers rushed to put together a roster of investors last week, Volkswagen stood out among the final group. This group, it should be noted, was apparently willing to put up $30 billion in funding for the buyout.

Sources with knowledge of the dealings claim this motley crew of big players was not what Musk had hoped for. He was warned that they, and most certainly VW, would want a big say in how the automaker conducted itself. Meanwhile, many of Musk’s beloved mutual funds and small, superfan investors threatened to pull out, or at least pare their holdings.

As we all know, Musk likes having his own hand on the tiller.

While all of this was going on, Saudi Arabia was growing perturbed. The country’s sovereign wealth fund, tapped as a source of funding for Musk’s plan, is not an ATM from which anyone can just withdraw cash. According to Bloomberg, the Saudis weren’t too pleased that Musk mentioned their meetings in a public blog post.

Nor were the Saudis interested in holding a large stake in the company, sources claim, with concerns about the SEC’s investigation into Musk’s Aug. 7th tweets creating concern among the fund’s overseers. There was never a deal reached on just how much the sovereign wealth fund would contribute, the sources state.

Funding secured? Not by a long shot.

Tesla’s share price fell nearly four percent after trading opened Monday morning, but the stock has since recovered half of the loss.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Aug 27, 2018

    I wonder how much of Tesla that VW was expecting to buy with $30B - perhaps hoping for a firesale price on an unprofitable company? Not sure why VW would want Tesla anyway. Audi and Porsche are equally prestigious brands, and VW certainly has better engineering and manufacturing capability and facilities. Perhaps they want inside knowledge about how to build cars in tents?

    • See 3 previous
    • Malforus Malforus on Aug 28, 2018

      It was a total greenwash acquisition to wash the Diesel scandal from the newspapers. Obviously they wanted TESLA so they could wipe away the smog of bad press. Unfortunately it would have been hamfisted at best and I am certain the TELSA Board was unwilling to take a valuation haircut in today's climate.

  • FWD Donuts FWD Donuts on Aug 27, 2018

    Interesting photo with this article. You might think that's a baby behind the wheel. Nope. That's a 35 year old Google engineer. Somehow, the camera settings revealed the age of his mental capacity. Guess I need to look at the settings of my iPhone a little more closely.

  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
  • Lou_BC Peak rocket esthetic in those taillights (last photo)
Next