By on April 14, 2022

Recently on Abandoned History, we learned about the Colt, a captive import Dodge/Plymouth/Eagle/AMC/Renault sold courtesy of a badge swap on some compact cars from Mitsubishi. During that series’ tenure, one of our readers had a great idea: A separate Abandoned History discussion of the captive import trucks and SUVs in the Dodge portfolio. The time has come!

As we discussed previously, the collaboration between Chrysler and Mitsubishi started in 1971 when Chrysler bought a stake in the Japanese conglomerate. Mitsubishi would use Chrysler as an outlet for some of its models in North America, a place where it had no distribution at all. For its investment, Chrysler gained access to small economical vehicles from Japan and didn’t have to spend any dollars on their development. It was a win-win.

The first Colts arrived in North America in 1971, but a truck import was not to follow for some time. The concept of a more efficient compact truck was not one the North American public was ready to accept without some convincing, and it took quite some time. A brief compact truck dissertation is in order.

Datsun was the first to offer its compact truck in the U.S. and started importation in 1959 with the Datsun 1000. Datsun owned the compact truck market for a few years and had the only offering until Toyota joined in 1964 with the Stout. Mazda was the third to market with a B1600 in 1972.

By then, domestic manufacturers noticed the Japanese imports were selling well enough to warrant some competition, and midway through 1972 Chevy began sales of the Isuzu P’up, badged as the LUV. That same year, Ford rebadged a Mazda B and offered the Courier. Both those domestic offerings hit right before the 1973 oil crisis, which saw sales of smaller vehicles (especially Japanese) skyrocket given their efficiency.

Chrysler was left empty-handed. In the mid-Seventies, the Dodge truck lineup consisted of the D series full size, the Ramcharger SUV (also offered as Plymouth Trailduster for a short while), and the Tradesman van series.

Part of the lack of compact truck entry was due to their choice of Japanese partner: Mitsubishi didn’t make a compact truck at all. The company’s largest utility vehicle was the Delica, on offer since 1969. But Delica didn’t translate into a pickup version; the only truck the company sold was a Kei class one. It was called Minicab and was based on the Minica sedan. Mitsubishi was still ramping up and filling in its product lineup throughout the Seventies and early Eighties, becoming the global giant it is today.

The first compact truck Mitsubishi ever made was the Forte. It entered production in 1978 for the Japanese market and went on sale for the ’79 model year. As was standard operating procedure for Mitsubishi, the Forte wore many different names dependent upon market. It was known as the L200 in many places, and that name, in particular, proved a lasting one.

Other market name variations included Mighty Max and various adjectives added to L200 like Express, and Power X. Most examples were built in Japan at Mitsubishi’s Nagoya plant, but there was additional production in Thailand and the Philippines. Mitsubishi’s trucks quickly proved themselves as reliable, affordable work vehicles in many parts of the world.

All examples had two doors, as it was not yet the age of the crew-cab truck. Various engines were used around the globe, but all of them had four cylinders. They ranged from a base 1.6-liter, through two different 2.0-liter mills. The largest gasoline engine was the 2.6, a 4G54 that made its way into many Mitsubishi and Chrysler products through the late Eighties. There were also two diesels, of 2.3- and 2.5-liter persuasions. The smaller one had a turbo. A sign of the times, all transmissions were manual and had either four or five speeds.

Three different wheelbases were offered, which started at 109.4 inches for a short-wheelbase and two-wheel drive. With four-wheel drive, that wheelbase grew to 110 inches. The longest wheelbase was only two-wheel drive and measured 119.5 inches. Overall length was around 184.6 inches, with 65 inches of width, and between 61 and 65 inches overall height dependent upon how many wheels were driven. Four-wheel drive was not available at the outset but was added to Mitsubishi-branded models internationally in 1981.

For size comparison, a D Series full-size truck used various wheelbases of 115, 131, 133, 135, 149, and even 165 inches, with an overall length of between 188 and 240 inches. Overall width was 79.8″, two feet wider than the Mitsubishi. There were many specifications and bed lengths on the full-size Dodge at the time, and it’s difficult to find length specifics. But the size differential was a big one.

Chrysler was quick to get some trucks shipped over to North America, and with an easy badge swap, the new Dodge D-50 was ready for 1979. The new truck also graced Plymouth dealers as the Arrow, not to be confused with the Fire Arrow hatchback (Mitsubishi Lancer). Bearing in mind there weren’t any Mitsubishi dealers in North America at the time, the only way to get one of the trucks was at your friendly Dodge dealer.

The initial styling included single headlamps, a key to telling the age of a first-gen D-50. In other parts of the world, single or double headlamps were available at the buyer’s discretion, alongside double circular headlamps. In Australia, the D-50 was sold as a Chrysler and featured circular headlamps instead.

All D-50s and Arrows were two-wheel-drive through the ’81 model year. Initial trims included the base D-50 with a 2.0-liter engine and a four-speed manual and the D-50 Sport with the 2.6-liter engine and a five-speed manual. Both engines included Mitsubishi’s new Silent Shaft balancing technology. The Sport was the one to have, as it included niceties like a complete gauge package, tape stripes, white letter tires, and even an FM band for the radio.

Exterior additions were few at introduction, and the big ones were a roll bar, grille guard, and a sunroof called “Sky Lite.” The D-50 and Arrow could be fitted with air conditioning, additional tape stripes, black mirrors, power steering, a rear step bumper, and additional sport cladding. Interestingly, unlike the Mitsubishi versions available in the rest of the world, an automatic transmission was available on the D-50. It would’ve been the same three-speed TorqueFlite as offered in the Colt.

Much like the other domestic brands and their captive import compact trucks, Dodge found success with the D-50 and Arrow. Changes for the D-50 happened gradually, the first of which was a renaming after 1980 – to Ram 50. The Plymouth Arrow name was not altered, though it was most certainly a slower seller than its Ram cousin; North American customers were not used to turning to Plymouth for trucks.

Indeed sales of the Arrow were such that it never made it through the first generation’s refresh: Arrow was canceled after the 1982 model year, which left Ram 50 to soak up the remaining customers. That same year, the four-wheel-drive system available since 1981 on the L200 arrived in North America. The drive system warranted special badging, as Power Ram 50. The Power Ram name was the one Dodge historically used to denote four-wheel drive.

In 1983 the Ram 50 was refreshed, visible most easily via the set of four rectangular headlamps. As Mitsubishi established its dealership network in the United States that year, it began selling its truck with its standard badging. For the U.S. market only, the truck was called Mighty Max. One wonders how many would’ve purchased the truck as a Dodge, but chose their Mitsubishi dealer once the option was available. They’d have to like the single headlamp look, as Mitsubishis kept the old appearance while the Dodge got to upgrade to the quad lamps.

Also for 1983, Ram 50 buyers saw a new engine appear as an optional extra: a 2.3-liter turbocharged 4D55 diesel engine. That same year, the same turbodiesel was an option on the new Ford Ranger, too. It was not used in any other North American vehicles. Initial horsepower on the turbodiesel was 80, but that increased in 1984 with a new wastegate to 86 horses. The engine arrived toward the end of the first-generation Ram 50’s run and was available only through 1985.

The first-gen Ram 50 had its final year in 1986, as a new one arrived for 1987. The Ram 50 established itself as a valid compact truck choice for its first-gen run, but Seventies trucks were looking pretty dated by the middle of the next decade. In Part II we’ll cover Ram 50, volume two.

[Images: Chrysler]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

18 Comments on “Abandoned History: Dodge’s Dead Import Trucks (Part I)...”

  • avatar

    I had the Mitsubishi version of the little truck. Timing belt was scheduled to be replaced at 50,000 miles and it broke at 49,900 miles. Fortunately it was a zero clearance engine and no harm was done. It was a good little truck that was great for suburban commuter and occasional hauling of stuff.

    • 0 avatar

      We had one of these when I was a teenager.

      We broke two timing belts on it. NBD, though — just pulled it off the road using the starter, had it towed to a mechanic, and got it back shortly afterwards.

      Our Mitsubishi/Dodge D-50 became my first vehicle. It was a terrible vehicle by most objective measures, but I had a lot of fun with it.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    In college I worked with/for a friend who had a window cleaning business. Three of us rode together in his D-50 from one job site to another, with the sectional cherry-picker ladders and buckets in the back.

    He chose the truck for its economy, low seat height, and low bed walls. We could lift a pretty full 5-gallon bucket over the side of the bed, something we did all day long. Try doing that with any pickup today, even the ‘compact’ ones.

    His was the el-cheapo 2.0 4-speed – very reliable and nice to drive. It was that invisible tan color shown in the picture above.

    Good memories.

    As popular as the new Maverick and Santa Cruz are, they don’t even compare to the size and austerity of those early small trucks. Of course, they aren’t death traps, either.

  • avatar
    Jeff S

    I had an 85 Mitsubishi Mighty Max for 14 years with the 2.0, 4 on the floor, air, and sliding rear window. Good little truck and tough. As for being a death trap many of the trucks from the 80s whether large or small did not have the safety features of today’s vehicles so they would be considered death traps today. Mine was European silver with a gray vinyl interior. I just got my new Maverick XLT hybrid Saturday and it is very comfortable and on the first fill up I got 50 mpgs. I do miss the long bed on the Mighty Max which was about 8 foot long but it was narrow. I had a bed liner in it and would hall rocks, pavers, 2 by 4s, riding lawn mowers, and anything that would fit in it. At the time it was a perfect truck for me and more than paid for itself.

    • 0 avatar

      Congrats, and on the Mighty Max too! It was a 7 ft bed option. I bought an ‘85 too, for just $100 in fair condition and flipped it to an employee for $300. 7 ft bed, manual and working A/C. That’s all they (mini trucks) were going for by the mid ‘90s unless they were 4X4 and or minty/low mi). There was such a huge glut of them on the market (then) and consumers were into the next hot trend (SUVs)

    • 0 avatar
      SCE to AUX

      Maverick – finally! Many happy miles to you! Looking forward to periodic updates.

      • 0 avatar
        Jeff S

        Thanks. The Maverick is a little truck and more than meets my needs. The electric motor starts initially so there is no engine sound until you drive it. Denver Mike as for the Mighty Max mine was a long bed. You could not pick one up in the mid 90s where I lived for $100 unlike California the Midwest has colder weather and lots of salt is used on the roads so by the mid 90s there were not a lot of the early Maxes left. Cannot complain I got 200k out of mine and gave it to my mechanic. It had its original paint which was like new and no rust but that was because I Ziebarted it and repaired any little rust it had also keeping it in a garage helps.

    • 0 avatar

      A buddy had one but “Dodge badged”. He had it dealer serviced and they did not properly replace the drain plug. Blew the motor. They eventually fixed but by then he was too pizzed off at the truck and sold it.

      • 0 avatar
        Jeff S

        That must have been a new employee doing oil changes at the dealer. Having an 85 Mighty Max with the 2.0 for 14 years it was an easy truck for access to the oil drain plug and oil filter and very easy to tighten the drain plug and oil filter. Did many an oil change on mine even without ramps or a lift. Everything was very accessible except the fuel pump which was in the gas tank. You could keep these trucks running for a long time with the exception of the bodies in cold climates which would rust from the salt on the roads. I miss the simplicity, great mpgs of these trucks, and their inexpensive price and long life. Used mine for hauling creek rock, 2 by 4s, plywood and particle board, pavers, sand and gravel, mulch, lawn tractors, junk, pulling tree stumps out, and driving off road in farm fields. It was one tough little truck which more than paid for itself.

  • avatar

    Back in the early 90s one of my cousins had one of these, the Mitsubishi version, short bed 2WD with the base engine and 4 spd. It was simple but reliable transportation.
    It was black and had a matching shell and period correct chromed steelies, it looked sharp to a kid like me. It never gave him any trouble and sold it by the late 90s, early aughts.

    Good memories

  • avatar

    I got to drive a 1996 Mitsu version for 2 weeks in the early ought’s while my jeep was in the shop. While it was very basic(Manual windows, 5 speed NO AC) it was a great little truck. I would love to be able to get a truck like that now (with AC of course)

  • avatar

    Those were some damn good-looking little trucks. Very clean, not overdone. There were several running around my hometown back in the day.

  • avatar

    D-50s were cool little trucks. Kind of strange the mini pickups went away. Dodge brought back the Charger nosed Rampage a few years later. After a couple of years a Chrysler exec said “after every pool cleaner owned one sales fell off a cliff.”

    10-12 years ago I was in Mexico on business a lot. The streets were covered with tiny Chevrolet Tornadoes — which are really cool mini-pickups capable of hauling around a couple of guys and a bed full of stuff. Seemed odd that stuff like the Ranger was going away in favor of full-sized products — yet were selling well everywhere else.

    Now, with the Colorado, Maverick, etc., the tide seems to have changed….

  • avatar
    Art Vandelay

    And out come the rose colored glasses. These were slow and crude and lacked the power to pull a greasy string out of a cat’s kiester, but at least they were unsafe too!

    • 0 avatar

      I mean I can understand why new trucks are better and I love fullsize trucks, but these are fun in their own way. I assume it’s a similar appeal to driving an old air cooled VW. It’s very mechanical experience and not much separates you from the goings on. They are also mechanically simple very easy to work and and cheap to fix, while being practical. my 87 Toyota sucked at towing but it was fine with 1ooo lbs in the bed and was awesome offroad.

      • 0 avatar
        Jeff S

        Agree I enjoyed both my 85 Mitsubishi Mighty Max and my 1999 S-10 both had manual transmissions. I didn’t need a large truck but I did need and used the bed of both and they were small enough to where they were easy to drive, easy to park, and easy on the gas. Both were actually fun to drive particularly on a curvy twisty road.

  • avatar

    Real trucks have very short beds mounted very high in the air, to avoid any grime associated with doing actual useful work. (I know this because there is a Ford dealer two miles from my house.)

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Art Vandelay: If he is actually a Boomer he’s just going to say the Beatles.
  • Dave M.: Besides a challenging design and goofy name, Ford played Russian Roulette with all their divisions when they...
  • dwford: If you can only afford one vehicle, it just makes sense to get a crossover, sorry to say. And now that...
  • SCE to AUX: Curiously, the seat height on my 22 Santa Fe is the same as it was on my 09 Sedona, but the minivan looks...
  • Lorenzo: My uncle had one of these, bought new after his “grand tour of Europe”, 1944-47. For New England...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber