Opinion: Subaru is Doing Everything Just About Right


Tim asked the other day if I might work up an opinion piece on the current state of Subaru. “Sure,” I said, and immediately felt salty. In mind were many criticisms on how the smallish automaker is doing things currently. After that initial salty reaction, I got to thinking about Subaru’s current offerings and recent trajectory more critically. And I realized they’re doing most everything just as they should.
I can hear the criticisms emanating from fingertips right now as replies are prepared for the comments. The company lost the quirky nature it once had, it relies almost completely on CVTs to motivate its vehicles forward, they’re just making crossovers for normies, boring appliances, etc. How am I doing so far?
Those are the sort of criticisms I’d gathered in my initial brain scan about Subaru. But those are precisely the things they’re doing correctly, and have done for the past decade. It’s true that with offerings like the GL sedan/wagon and the XT in the Eighties, Subaru made weird design and engineering decisions. They were the offbeat, go-anywhere brand for people who didn’t want an AMC Eagle or a Jeep, or couldn’t afford a Volvo wagon. Their touring coupe XT was all over the place, complicated and expensive, and they didn’t really know who to market it to. Its successor, the SVX, was a stylish Giugiaro-designed automatic transmission sports coupe with crazy side windows that was slow and heavy, but priced like a twin-turbo 300ZX. So nobody bought it either. Around the 2009 period, Subaru pretty much quit producing weird things altogether. The Baja truck of 2006 was one of the last examples of Subaru off-the-wall stuff.
They added a three-row to the lineup in 2006, getting in on the larger crossover game with the B9 Tribeca. It didn’t really sell, but Subaru was making moves toward a crossover-centric brand. Circa 2009 the company began the switch to CVTs in place of traditional automatic transmissions. They started offering fewer things with manuals, and taking fewer risks. Of course with these “normalization” type changes their sales took right off, as evidenced by the chart below from Good Car Bad Car.

The brand was losing sales every year from 2006 through 2009. 2010 was the year of the redesigned Outback and Legacy (their volume models) with a CVT in tow and more crossover-y styling for the Outback in particular. A year earlier, the Forester adopted a more crossover-like shape and lost its boxy wagon look of the first two generations. It too switched to CVT in 2012. Crossover offerings expanded in 2017 with the addition of the Impreza-based Crosstrek XV, a competitor in the compact crossover segment. Journalists noticed the changes, but so did the average consumer. As the company headed toward the mainstream US sales have increased year over year, save for the mess which was 2020. The first competitive three-row CUV Subaru introduced, the Ascent, is selling like hotcakes.

There are still enthusiast corners at Subaru in the WRX, BRZ, and to a lesser extent, the XT performance trims. Those former two cars don’t really need much marketing effort. The WRX is the answer to a singular question for its faithful buyers; there’s no other option. There’s even a new one coming later this year (well overdue). The Toyota-Subaru jointly developed BRZ sports car is there for customers who prefer a Subaru badge over a Toyota one. That’s a new model too, and it enters production later this year. Subaru is showing commitment to its enthusiast models.
But the enthusiast niche is not their primary target and Subaru knows it. Their marketing is geared toward families: safety, driver assistance, all-wheel-drive security, dogs, camping. All the things crossover buyers envision doing with their cars but seldom do. Having said that, I’d bet good money that Subaru owners use their cars for more crossover activities than buyers at other brands. To that end, Subaru has expanded into a Wilderness trim line, which butches up the Outback (so far) in an attempt to capture the off-road enthusiast. The sort of Jeep or Bronco-Esque buyer who takes it a step past camping at the bottom of the hill. We’ll see how that goes. As an aside, the Wilderness trim is a bit much for yours truly, and reads “try hard.” But like you (probably), these cars are Not For Me. They’re for other people.
Think of it this way: In 2006 VW sold about 223,000 cars in the US, Mazda shifted 268,000, and Subaru sold 259,000. In 2019 (the most recent complete, normal year) VW moved 363,000, Mazda sold 279,000, and Subaru managed 700,000. That’s a 170 percent increase in 14 years, the calculator tells me. Subaru is right where they need to be.
[Images: Corey Lewis, Matthew Guy / TTAC, Good Car Bad Car]

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Writing things for TTAC since late 2016 from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio. You can find me on Twitter @CoreyLewis86, and I also contribute at Forbes Wheels.
More by Corey Lewis
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Ernesto Perez There's a line in the movie Armageddon where Bruce Willis says " is this the best idea NASA came up with?". Don't quote me. I'm asking is this the best idea NY came up with? What's next? Charging pedestrians to walk in certain parts of the city? Every year the price for everything gets more expensive and most of the services we pay for gets worse. Obviously more money is not the solution. What we need are better ideas, strategies and inventions. You want to charge drivers in the city - then put tolls on the free bridges like the Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges. There's always a better way or product. It's just the idiots on top think they know best.
- Carsofchaos The bike lanes aren't even close to carrying "more than the car lanes replaced". You clearly don't drive in Midtown Manhattan on a daily like I do.
- Carsofchaos The problem with congestion, dear friends, is not the cars per se. I drive into the city daily and the problem is this:Your average street in the area used to be 4 lanes. Now it is a bus lane, a bike lane (now you're down to two lanes), then you have delivery trucks double parking, along with the Uber and Lyft drivers also double parking. So your 4 lane avenue is now a 1.5 lane avenue. Do you now see the problem? Congestion pricing will fix none of these things....what it WILL do is fund persion plans.
- FreedMike Many F150s I encounter are autonomously driven...and by that I mean they're driving themselves because the dips**ts at the wheel are paying attention to everything else but the road.
- Tassos A "small car", TIM????????????This is the GLE. Have you even ever SEEN the huge thing at a dealer's??? NOT even the GLC,and Merc has TWO classes even SMALLER than the C (The A and the B, you guessed it? You must be a GENIUS!).THe E is a "MIDSIZED" crossover, NOT A SMALL ONE BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, oh CLUELESS one.I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THE NONSENSE you post here every god damned day.And I BET you will never even CORRECT your NONSENSE, much less APOLOGIZE for your cluelessness and unprofessionalism.
Comments
Join the conversation
I would love to purchase a Subaru; however, their design is less like an SUV and nothing more than Station wagons that my father owned when I was a child, over 55 years ago. Hopefully, one day, they will design something more truck/car like, something more muscular. If they would take a clue from the BMW X6 or even the 2017 Mercedes GLA, which I had leased, that would push others who feel as I do, into their showrooms.
I left TTAC because of irresponsible articles like this. I came back to take a peak and this was what I found. What's the point? You have here some amateur on a car site that doesn't rank on any Google hits trying to pontificate about national public health policy. You can just go to r/cars and actually talk about cars with better educated people without the angsty male boomer vibe.