Opinion: Here's Where Infiniti Lost Its Way
Late last year I put forth some thoughts about the future direction of Infiniti, largely about how the company was on a downward trajectory. Looking forward, the brand needs a major change in direction – not much has changed since December when I wrote that piece.
But one might then logically ask “Where did the company first lose its way?” I’m going to answer that question right now. Let’s take a little trip to the Before Times, in 1990.
That was the first model year for Infiniti just like it was the first model year for Lexus, but Infiniti started off on the wrong foot. I am of course speaking about the Q45, the grill-free, no-nonsense, no-wood, super-serious, full-size luxury sedan that was the company’s flagship. Where Lexus spent big money and years dreaming up an all-new car for its first U.S. luxury foray, Nissan went the cheap route. It took the upcoming new-generation President (the company’s JDM full-sizer) and then tried to Americanize it. Whereas Lexus made a more reliable Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Infiniti made a more hardcore BMW 7-Series without any of the iconic styling.
Americans wanted wood, ruched leather, a hood ornament, and a reasonably compliant suspension in their large sedans (they hate all that shit today, but whatever). Infiniti got a focus group together and then proceeded to edit the President into a firm-riding car without any wood or ruched leather. No grille, no hood ornament. After Judgment Error Number One was finished, they hired an ad agency to produce commercials for the exciting new Q45, and chose not to show it to customers. That’s right, they assumed that the luxury car buyer concerned with image and prestige would visit their dealer upon seeing an ad with a lake, rocks, and trees and “You can see this at a dealer!” tag line. That didn’t work then, and it wouldn’t work today. It was a terrible idea.
Their other premier offering was the M30 coupe and convertible. Based again on an existing Nissan, the Leopard, Infiniti went cheapo. Lexus spent big time money on the SC 400 and amortized that cost with the now-legendary Supra with which it shared a platform. The Leopard had some wood and leather added eventually (they’re learning!) and debuted as the M30. The Leopard wasn’t a bad car per se, and it had the V6 from the 300ZX. But it was again not what the American customer wanted. It was dated looking, too square, too small, not nice enough inside for the asking price, and half-assed. The SC and Acura Legend trounced it.
Shortly thereafter, Infiniti went after the Lexus ES 300 and the BMW 3-Series with the Nissan Primera-based G20. The Primera was more a world car than the President or Leopard, and more competitive generally. But G20 was a compact sedan with very bland styling, again based on something slightly too small for its American purpose. The ES 300 was larger and more luxurious and had interesting frameless windows. Most importantly, the ES didn’t look like it was a Camry. The G20 looked like a Sentra – which it wasn’t – but people assumed it anyway. People still think that even today in the age of the Internet. The G20 did make it quite a while (another problem) and earned itself a second generation that ran from 1999 to 2002. Infiniti had been around for nine years when the second G20 debuted, and the brand was still was doing badge swap jobs against unique Lexus product.
Don’t worry I didn’t forget the other Nineties flop they had, the midsize J30! Again with 300ZX power, the J30 was a slight rework of an updated Leopard, the Leopard J Ferie sedan. At least the J30 had unique looks, but they came at a price: Space. The midsize exterior of the J was not reflected in its interior, where it had space like a subcompact. The J was smaller than a contemporary Sentra inside because of its aggressive roofline and stubby trunk. The ingredients were there on this one: good engine, rear-drive platform, Poltrona Frau interior. But they misjudged the market again and delivered a car too small and too quirky looking for Americans. The rear end treatment is not dissimilar to a bustle-back Seville, really. And how’d that one go?
This Nineties foundation started Infiniti off in the wrong direction, and the brand really never recovered. There was overcompensation in the opposite direction in the case of the second-gen Q45. It was a mushy, Buick-like car without a unique V8 (and was actually 4.1-liter). Gen-two Q was based on a smaller less prestigious car than the original Q. While Lexus was improving the LS 400 into the LS 430, Infiniti aimed downward and put forth a smaller car with a shorter wheelbase and a smaller engine. But it had lots of ruched leather and wood, at least. Your father might have considered one if he didn’t like the Park Avenue’s styling update in ’97.
The company’s had two or three bright spots along the way, but they’ve never been able to replicate the success or mature it into a second-generation offering. The G35 was a sales success and brought back sporting credibility to Infiniti. Sedan, coupe, convertible, the G35 was the right product at the right time. It used Nissan’s FM platform that carried over into the G37 version, where things started to fall apart. It wasn’t as inspired as the G35, and overall less original. The VQ V6 problem was here too, among others: Each time Nissan made the VQ larger it lost some refinement, sounded more like a paint mixer, and got more thirsty (3.0, 3.5, 3.7, 4.0). G37 became Q50 and Q60, and that 20-year-old FM platform is still in use today. It’s a big problem that Nissan can’t seem to fix.
FM also became the FX35, a stylish and unique crossover way ahead of its time. But then it turned into the FX37 and started looking like a fish. There weren’t enough new ideas there, and people demanded more cargo room out of their midsize two-row SUV circa 2009. They’d be okay with crap cargo room now because that’s marketable as “coupe SUV,” which is bullshit, but it would’ve worked had the FX persisted today.
Their third success was the I30 and subsequent I35, reworked Maximas which were different enough to work because the Maxima underneath them was decent enough at the time. Moderately luxurious, reliable, softer, and quieter than Maxima, attainably priced. The I30 especially was a nice car (if boring). The I35 suffered at the hands of cost-cutting in a big way but was still serviceable, and sold well. I35 lived on too long as Infiniti readied the G.
Oh, and there’s more FM: the M35. A larger midsize, M took over for the final Q45 as the only large-ish sedan the brand offered in 2007 (it shared the stage with Q for 2006). It was unrelated to the M45, a rebadged Nissan Gloria circa 2003 that was very enthusiast-approved but flopped with the general public given its looks. A generally successful offering, the M35 was not large enough to compete with full-size offerings from the other luxury brands and went against the E-Class, Lexus GS, and BMW 5-Series. The M had 2003-type styling at introduction in ’06 and maintained it through 2010 when everyone else had long moved forward. It was updated in 2011, again to add fish-like styling elements. It got larger in its rework (still not full-size), and spawned a long-wheelbase L version. It was renamed Q70 in short order but by then nobody cared. Stretched beyond its means, the FM Q70 did not feel well made, had an outdated interior full of 2006 components that were never updated, and was floppy in its handling while being too firm over bumps.
I’ve gone on for a while here and now I’m worn out. In summation, bad foundational product lead to a poor start. The foundational product was bad because Nissan didn’t invest enough in Infiniti the way Toyota did with Lexus and to a lesser extent Honda did with unique product for Acura. The G37 should have been the last FM platform ever, yet Infiniti can’t seem to get away from it. Among their more recent problems, the subsistence on FM is the worst, most important, and most persistent. When are they gonna cut that cord?
Varezhka on Jul 18, 2021
Infiniti failed, like all other large scale Nissan projects, because Nissan is the Japanese GM. Originally a major part of the Ayukawa conglomerate, Nissan was always the car maker with the strongest political ties to the Japanese government. Much more so than that family business ran by loom makers in Aichi. What that meant was Nissan always brought in people with strong political ambitions. (People went from Nissan to politics, and back to Nissan after retirement) This is why an Ayukawa relative by the name of Katayama was shipped over to the sure to fail business over in USA by his boss. When this "Mr. K" was actually successful in making Datsun a household name, he was kicked out of the company and the Datsun name killed. Skyline/Infiniti G was always a sore point because it was a product line started by Prince Motor Company and ran by people from the former Prince, not Nissan proper. What this meant was every time a Skyline is successful, its engineering budget were cut. So a big project like Infiniti? Everyone wanted a cut in the project so a million people giving random input and wanting budget. Anyone not part of the project will try their best to undermine it. So the only time it was marginally successful was when Ghosn came in with his iron fist and gave some semblance of control. Of course, until he became more focused on filling his coffers instead of the company, just like all other of his predecessors.
Jrocco001 on Jul 26, 2021
I've owned two Infinitis (QX56, current QX80 owner) and one Nissan (2012 Maxima) in the last 10 years. IMHO I don't think their designers actually drive their cars, and both brands have the unique distinction of undercutting themselves. The 2010 QX56, despite having an ancient(at the time) 5-speed transmission, is arguably better than the QX80. Why? They decontented the vehicle with the redesign. The QX80 is a huge, tall vehicle. You can't open the liftgate in most garages without it hitting the ceiling or garage door overhead. The QX56 solved this issue with a rear tailgate window that could be opened so you could reach inside and grab your groceries or whatever (my 2019 Acura RDX is even more creative, in that it allows you to set the amount of travel the liftgate will open, however since that is a small, compact SUV it's not even an issue). The window is now fixed on the QX80. Other things missing from the QX80 that the QX56 had: driver's armrest, rear cargo area windows that could crack open to allow ventilation, a valet/manual key to start the vehicle (it's ridiculous that if the CR2020 battery in your key fob dies, you cannot start the vehicle - I learned this the hard way). The backup camera is crap (the camera on my 2012 Nissan had higher resolution than the 2018 QX), and the placement of the rear backup lights makes it useless at night as it has zero ability to display anything in the dark, as the lights don't illuminate anything behind you. They only reason we bought it is because we needed a large SUV for our family that could tow a camper, and there are very few vehicles that check both boxes. The Maxima was an OK car, but no better than the Altima, especially in the last generation (the one I owned). The CVT is a mistake, the interior, while more plush than the Altima, is not much larger. Rather than make the Maxima a better car, they removed the V6 from the Altima line to put some space between the two in the current gen. This is what bugs me about Nissan/Infiniti: they have failed to invest in their products where it matters. They could likely save a bit of money and make the Maxima/Altima one car (with standard and optional drivetrains if need be) and not worry about poaching from Infiniti with a competitive V6 sedan (the Q cars are still RWD vs FWD). The variable compression engine? Meh - no real world benefits, and they seem to be having issues with refinement and it's just added complexity. They completely failed to capitalize and innovate the GT-R, which when it came out was a very desirable sports car (and IMHO, still is, but has aged out of the segment). I'd really be curious if they had an actual roadmap of where they see their product line in the future.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- IBx1 Maybe if they focused on making good cars instead of anonymous consumer-grade automatic blobs they wouldn't get platform-shared.
- IBx1 Looks fantastic, especially the front aero feature, but it sounds like an Oreck and no EV will ever have soul.
- Tane94 are both eligible for federal tax credits? That's the big $7,500 question.
- Jkross22 Toenail says what?
- MaintenanceCosts This sounds like old-school GM drama!