Jekyll & Hyde Jeeps Aim to Steal a Certain Ford's Limelight

by Steph Willems

Published: July 14th, 2020

jekyll hyde jeeps aim to steal a certain ford s limelight

What’s an automaker to do when a well-off rival decides to throw its hat in the ring? Fight back with whatever’s at hand, then brainstorm new weaponry.

That’s what Jeep did Monday, revealing a concept Wrangler powered by a 6.4-liter V8 and hinting — nudge, nudge — that the potent off-roader might one day reach production. And as a certain vehicle that rhymes with Ronco premiered last night, Jeep pulled out its backup: an upcoming vehicle that’s the polar opposite of the Rubicon 392.

Using every tool at its disposal to draw eyes back to the dedicated off-road brand, Jeep released a short video titled Do Not Disturb — a spot that depicts a Wrangler traversing very Bronco-worthy terrain (and even passing herds of wild horses!) under electric power.

The vehicle in question is the Wrangler 4xe, which is Jeep’s preferred moniker for its upcoming electrified vehicle. The plug-in hybrid variant of the Wrangler isn’t an unknown quantity; it’s been talked up since Jeep introduced the current-generation JL for 2018. Now, it seems the electrified off-roader is drawing near.

Lest anyone miss the subtle swipe taken Ford in the video, Jeep issued a Twitter post that makes it a little more obvious. While Ford is expected to add a hybrid variant of the Bronco at some point, Jeep’s green Wrangler is closer to market. The Bronco itself doesn’t reach consumers until spring, 2021. The PHEV Wrangler will be in dealers by then.

“The vehicle will arrive in our showrooms in the [United States] by the end of this year and in Europe and China early next year,” Fiat Chrysler CEO Mike Manley said during a recent shareholder’s meeting, per Motor Trend. Expected to pair a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylidner with an electric motor and battery capable of powering the vehicle for 30 or so miles, the Wrangler 4xe will be FCA’s biggest electrified product introduction since the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid (there haven’t been many of these, as the EPA and Tesla will be happy to tell you).

While one can roll their eyes at the Rubicon 392, the Wrangler 4xe is a bigger blow for Ford, a company that wears its eco-consciousness on its sleeve. Jeep might have the older vehicle, but for a while, anyway, it can at least best its rival in terms of technology.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#FutureModels #Green #HybridPHEV #Jeep #JeepWrangler #JeepWrangler4xe #ProductPlanning #Rivalry #Wrangler #Wrangler4xe

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 22 comments

EBFlex on Jul 14, 2020

What will be nice is when Jeep drops the 5.7L in the Wrangler and Gladiator (nice to have a proper V8) and the tow rating will skyrocket. With the Ford Blazer only being able to tow 3500 pounds, Jeep has a wonderful opportunity to, yet again, one up Ford (which really is unnecessary as the Ford Blazer is clearly lagging behind the Wrangler as is).

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- MrIcky on Jul 15, 2020
  
  Tow rating will likely drop unless they truly gut all the running gear.
  
  Like
- Whynot on Jul 15, 2020
  
  You are assuming the current engines are what is holding back Jeep’s legal tow ratings and not pesky things like the chassis, gearing, or wheelbase (particularly for the Wrangler). More power does not automatically mean a higher tow rating.
  
  Like
Lou_BC on Jul 15, 2020

Why confuse him with logic

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.