By on March 25, 2020


Here’s a change of pace: something to look forward to! In this instance, it’s a bevy of Toyota products poised to spring forth after this virus thing shuffles beneath the banner of “bad memory.”

The brand that’s shown no shortage of initiative in recent years plans to continue its new product flow, this time focusing more on trucks than cars.

Instagram account Allcarnews, the source of several big-ticket product leaks in recent months, claims to have the goods on what’s to come from Toyota. Sadly, no pictures, but maybe you’re interested in hearing about the GR86?

What’s that, you ask? A second-generation 86 is on the way, and with it a new Subaru BRZ twin. Allcarnews claims the first-gen GT86 (as it’s called in Europe) will give way to the GR86, and product plans reveal the model will finally get a much-rumored addition: power. The powerplant beneath the little rear-drive coupe’s hood is said to be a turbocharged unit making 255 horses. If that sounds like Subaru’s new 2.4-liter Boxer engine, you’re bang on. “GR,” of course, signifies Toyota’s Gazoo Racing sub-brand.

Expect to see the GR86 bow in July 2021. That same year is said to bring a refresh for the stalwart Camry, still holding its own in a troubled segment on the strength of its name recognition, and a new Lexus IS. The GS sedan is apparently as good as dead, which comes as no surprise to any Toyota watcher.

Two oddball details exist in the documents, and both are unconfirmed: a Corolla-badged crossover (lifted AWD hatch?) due next year, and the return of the crossover-like Venza. Remember the Venza? It’s not an unpleasant memory. How a similar model would fit into the present lineup, however, is unclear. In the past, Toyota has expressed interest in the idea of fielding two models in the same segment — so long as that segment sells.

As for trucks, the high-flying Tacoma will apparently see a new iteration for 2024, but not before the bulk of Toyota’s truck lineup undergo its own revamp.

The ancient, full-size Tundra, widely expected to undergo radical changes within the next 12 months, will be all-new for the 2021 model year. Gone is the model’s standard V8 power, replaced with a sole twin-turbocharged hybrid V6. This is in line with what we’ve been hearing for months. The plans supposedly say the truck will ride atop a version of Toyota’s TNGA architecture, this one carrying the moniker TNGA-F.

We await rear suspension details…

From that platform, a new Sequoia, 4Runner, and Lexus LX will allegedly spring forth in 2022, with the latter model bringing extra plushness and power to the table. Again, we’ve seen evidence of this. In 2023, Lexus’ volume-leading RX crossover and older-than-Bob Dole GX SUV are said to undergo full revamps; in the case of the latter model, it’s long past due.

Elsewhere in the automaker’s stable, the surprisingly strong-selling NX crossover will receive a new platform and probably a little extra bulk in the near future. The LS and ES sedans will see a styling refresh for 2022, and the second-generation Toyota Mirai will also don a Lexus badge, forming a replacement for the outgoing GX. That’s a head scratcher, as the Mirai is a low-volume hydrogen fuel cell vehicle sold in California. If Toyota can outfit it with a conventional electric motor/battery pack combo, there could be some usefulness to the idea.

Once again, these details are all unconfirmed. One hopes this deluge of details put your mind at rest for just a brief moment.

[Images: Toyota]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

39 Comments on “Leaked: Toyota Product Timeline, Other Juicy Tidbits...”

  • avatar

    Can’t wait for the new pickups. Taco particularly.

    • 0 avatar

      If they fix the cab dimensions it will be truly revolutionary. Otherwise, unlike all of its more modern competition, the roof will still be too low, and the seat still too close to the floor.

  • avatar
    Guy A

    There was also talk of a hybrid Sienna. Will be interesting to see the new GR, has promise.

  • avatar

    “Gone is the model’s standard V8 power, replaced with a sole twin-turbocharged hybrid V6”

    aaaaaand Toyota just lost half its prospective tundra buyers…

    • 0 avatar
      Dave M.

      To the contrary…Ford’s done just fine with a twin-turbo, and a hybrid assist can only boost mileage. Comparatively, I bet Tundra buyers as a group are younger and more tech leaning than the other brands….

      • 0 avatar

        Having owned Turbo and Normally aspirated–I disagree that the Turbo issue is all sorted. From Audi to Ford and others, the repair rates and true longevity is not there. Will it make it to warranty–Yes, maybe. How about 100K, 200K, 300K no way. Laugh at the 300K reference all you want, but Sequoia owners have come to expect that. Honestly, shouldn’t we all?

      • 0 avatar

        How “tech-leaning” can be attracted to the ancient V8 full size truck? It does not make sense. May be because it is not the case. I would think “tech-leaning youth” would be attracted to the latest tech.

    • 0 avatar

      You mean the other half. compared with the ones it loses now because the 5.7 has atrocious fuel economy even for the segment?

      • 0 avatar

        Dunno about that. Yeah, its bad. On my Tundra, I averaged around 15mpg. But most of the Ford and Ram V8 guys that I know are strangely getting about the same despite what the window sticker says. The only engines that deliver a real difference are the smaller Ford 2.7 Ecoboost and the Pentastar ETorque. But both of those have noted reliability problems.

        Mileage isnt everything, and I would rather pay $3000 more in gas over the lifetime of a truck to have reliability instead of spending one day in a crummy rental because my truck blew a turbo for the third time, or a transmission before 5000 miles, or a head unit that constantly reboots itself, and parts arent available so I have to wait 2-3 weeks for parts, then coronavirus hits and they cant get the parts from China, now I am in a Versa Note for several weeks while paying $700/month toward a truck I cant use.

        Ill take a V8 Tundra, please.

        • 0 avatar
          Art Vandelay

          Where are the “noted reliability problems” on the 2.7 EB? By all I’ve read it has been solid.

        • 0 avatar

          Agreed, SS. Reliability is the highest value in a vehicle, in my opinion. A Rolls Royce that breaks down all the time is just a Yugo, as far as I’m concerned. A bulletproof Tundra 5.7 is solid gold. That is why people love Toyota.

  • avatar

    Maybe the new Tacoma will have this radical new braking system for the rear – disks instead of drums!

  • avatar
    R Henry

    I think Toyota is wise to follow the F150 down the turbo V6 road. Truth be told, the EcoBoost V6 engine program has been VERY successful for F150, with the V8 take rate being low enough that Ford has reduced production for the Coyote V8 engines. The longer RAM and GM delay getting on the turbo V6 train, the more sales they will sacrifice.

    –As for RAM, I believe the PentaStar V6 was initially designed to support turbocharging, so there will not be a need to start from scratch. As for GM, I am sure they will be late, and with an inferior product, as is their SOP.

  • avatar
    Art Vandelay

    Does the fact that the tundra is slated for TNGA imply a unibody?

    Also, would be nice if a twin turbo, actual Toyota 6 cylinder found its way to the Supra.

  • avatar

    The Japanese domestic market is expecting a redesigned Harrier soon as a more road oriented alternative to the RAV4 that’s a bit longer, sleeker, and upmarket. It’s also rumored to be hybrid only this time around.
    Maybe this will be the new Venza?

  • avatar

    The 4Runner needs to get a V8 back under the hood.

    • 0 avatar

      Not gonna happen. The only V8 in Toyota’s future plans is a twin-turbo monster intended for Lexus F machines. The 400+ hp electrified turbo V6 coming to the Tundra will be the top engine choice for anything else.

      • 0 avatar

        Regardless, the 4Runner needs another V8, particularly since the class it is in is expanding, it would be a simple addition to set it apart.

        • 0 avatar

          I’d rather want a Euro style 4cyl diesel in the 4R. It’s a horribly clumsy powertrain on the road, but in a “small” (hence limited fueltank) vehicle with a decent share of it’s remaining attractiveness stemming from it’s suitability for overlanding, range in the bush trumps near all else.

        • 0 avatar

          Regardless of the fact that there’s no business case for it?

          Stop expecting a V8 4Runner or you will simply disappoint yourself. It’s not needed.

      • 0 avatar

        Exactly, it’s not a good question to ask, let alone demand at this point. Nothing in the midsize mainstream offers such an option.

        You got it right, but there’s more to that in terms of choice.

  • avatar
    Secret Hi5

    GS v IS
    Wonder why Lexus decided to go with the IS name rather than GS, if the new IS straddles both.

  • avatar

    Mmm, new 86/BRZ. I’m due for a new car in 2022, God willing and the Coronavirus don’t rise.

  • avatar
    CKNSLS Sierra SLT

    Most get around 14mpg on Fulley in a Tundra.

  • avatar

    Should I feel sad about the demise of the GS? I think they are head turners (especially in F-Sport guise in the generation before the current one) but never hear much about them.

  • avatar

    Being the source of this information myself as the so-called Motor1 insider and seeing the number of mistakes being spread across the web, in terms of launch dates and MOST specifically the Lexus GS/Mirai claim, I signed up to clear it all up ASAP.

    I don’t understand why this site would rely on some Instawhore clickbait page, who copied information that originated from Motor1 in February.

    Too many sites are trusting All Crap News and it has become a horrible rumor Mill.

    A number of the dates have been taken out of context by this idiot, as well as Motor1 the primary source of it.

    I am an automotive engineer who used to work for Jaguar Land Rover in Coventry, England, currently working for another automaker and have a lot of other industry contacts.

    Using 3 of those industry wide contacts, I collected information on a number of future model programs and chose to provide it to Motor1 privately.

    What I have been seeing is other media entities copy from those articles in February and at least give credit in most cases to Motor1.

    I do see on occasion what I did provide being taken out of context and dates screwed up.

    What has happened here with this johnny-come-lately is that they have screwed up so much of the text and made their own extrapolations, using my information and anonymity, to be some magical high placed “insider”, to give their story credibility. Basically making claims on whoever I am, to make it sound like I drink saké with Akio Toyoda.

    They piggybacked off of one of 3 slides for future models, unauthorized from being publicized to give themselves further credibility.

    There is no new E segment RWD offering coming to the Lexus brand, so this report is false. Not the whole report, but ANY part of it that differs from the Motor1 story in February.

    Per a contact, who had very deep knowledge on a 2019 TOYOTA dealer conference in the early autumn of 2019, the 2021 Toyota Mirai was revealed to attendees and it was eventually explained to them, that this was the 2020 GS, upon being questioned and murmurs about “why wasn’t this a Lexus”?

    That is because the 300B development program was suspended indefinitely around October 2016, as it was due for design freeze completion ahead of planned Job 1 in April 2019.

    By 2017 all remnants of the program were quietly shifted into the Mirai effort, now for model year 2021.

    The redesign of the existing Mirai into this vehicle was rather abrupt considering it had a very short life cycle.

    If you compare early 2016 renderings of the upcoming GS redesign to a concept at the Tokyo Motor Show in 2017 called LS+ and then to this Mirai, the hardpoints fore of the A pillar are totally identical an all 3 examples.

    The final design for the GS 300B program was decided on in the first half of 2016 which is where the rendering came from. It was supposed to be locked in during October 2016.

    LS+ is nearly identical and was shown as a preview of future Lexus sedans, particularly the aborted 2020 GS.

    The theory that Lexus is going to introduce a rebadge of the Mirai is a bunch of nonsense drummed up by a fool who took Motor1’s story out of context.

    If that was ever planned, the Mirai itself would not exist under a Toyota badge as a RWD offering, when elevation of Lexus is supposed to be a goal one.

    GS production ends later this year and it will not be replaced in that segment, outside of FWD ES being upgraded.

    I wish people would be very careful about who they trust as a source because of Motor1 is a professional entity that NEVER said this.

    All Crap News is full of it and did not appreciate being called out on their plagiarist, erroneous report. Typical of Engrish spambot pages.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Jeff S: I did something similar to hypermilling during the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973 with my parents 64 Impala wagon...
  • Art Vandelay: You have nothing to refute with respect to what he says, so you just attack the person. Typical.
  • Jeff S: @Dave M.–He is just part of the Trumpers who are told to go out and spread the big lie that the...
  • EBFlex: “According to a T-shirt I saw a young man wearing on June 19th at church celebrating the 4th of July...
  • EBFlex: “His keyboard doesn’t have spell- or IQ-check.” “Certainly no IQ check. But probably an...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber