Lexus LX to Go Further Upscale?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In the Lexus lineup, no vehicle is larger — or older ⁠— than the LX 570, a true luxo barge if there ever was one. Riding atop a platform shared with the Toyota Land Cruiser and Tundra, the current body-on-frame LX 570 appeared in the spring of 2007, going on sale later that year as a 2008 model.

A redesign isn’t expected for another few years, making this model generation longer-lived than most marriages. And yet a clue exists of a new LX to come — one that scraps the LX 570 name for a loftier number.

A U.S. trademark filing spotted by Autoguide reveals Lexus has a new model in mind: LX 600.

Such filings tell us nothing about the vehicle except to point out whether a name is indeed bound for the exterior of a vehicle, which this one certainly is.

While the current model name denotes the presence of a 5.7-liter V8 that’s carried the model for many years, the LX600 name can be taken two ways. Either Toyota has a larger displacement in mind for the model’s eight-banger, or it plans to do away with naming convention and lend the “600” designation to a lower-displacement engine with more power than the old mill.

Despite putting out 383 horsepower and 403 lb-ft of torque, the LX’s acceleration is hampered by a prodigious curb weight born of its ancient platform. While fine for cruising and getting up to highway speed in normal driving, it’s not as fleet of foot as some rivals.

Lexus is said to have a number of new big-vehicle powerplants under development, including a twin-turbo V8 of considerable less displacement than 5.7 liters, as well as a hybrid V6 bound for the next Tundra. Given that the trademark filing is for LX 600 and not LX 600h, it’s safe to assume an upcoming LX will offer the larger of these engines.

As for when it will appear, that’s another mystery. Some reports have placed the new Tundra’s introduction as early as the 2021 model year; Automotive News’ Product Pipeline, however, cites an intro date of 2023 for the next LX, which borrows the Tundra’s new, lighter weight platform. Of course, engine upgrades don’t have to coincide with a bottom-up revamp.

[Images: © 2019 Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Mjz Mjz on Oct 16, 2019

    That thing is simply ridiculous looking.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Oct 18, 2019

    You guys, you accidentally used a pic of one that was in a horrible head-on collision. Oh wait, it's supposed to look like that?

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next