QOTD: The One You Passed Over?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Last night, as I drove to the spot where I run in the woods like a creepy person with something to hide, a silver Chevy Spark drove past. The owner of this sub-subcompact model, which has so far managed to avoid Mary Barra’s axe, had outfitted his pint-sized ride with fairly presentable aftermarket wheels. You know the ones: black spokes, chrome outer rim. Not obnoxiously oversized, either.

This driver was motoring with precision and purpose, making good use of his 98 horses. It got me thinking. Clearly, this was all the car the driver could afford (base Canadian MSRP: $9,995 before destination), but he wanted to make it special. Just a little bit better. He wanted to put a personal stamp on his econobox; make it something he could be proud of.

And you know what? That’s great. It made me a little nostalgic of my first car purchase, but it also got me me thinking about the car that didn’t make the cut.

Often, when buying your very first car, the slate of candidates dwindles down to just two entries, each teetering on either ends of the scale. Different pros and cons. Differing outputs, content, and perhaps purpose. With exceedingly sparse checking accounts bankrolling this purchase, only one candidate makes it home to the parents’ driveway.

In my case, I’ve sometimes wondered how my social life (and bank balance) would have fared had I gone with that other car. It wasn’t sexy, but it was cheap. And, unlike the half-rotten four-cylinder Mustangs prowling used car lots back in the day, it wasn’t penalized by overzealous insurers. The car wasn’t dissimilar from the choice I went with. Both were two-door hatchbacks, each with a four-cylinder engine and a five-speed manual. Both were anywhere but high on the automotive social ladder.

The car I passed over for a lemon in waiting was a Suzuki Swift GT from the glorious year of 1991, if memory serves me correctly. Boasting a second camshaft the Plymouth lacked and seven more horsepower, the 1.3-liter hatchback would probably have been a cheap, fuel-sipping, featherweight box that could have offered up a grin every now and then. Possibly. The thing is, Geo Metros were still a common sight at the time, and the Swift’s genetic connection to that piece of rolling abstinence earned it a second-place finish in this buyer’s race.

You’re probably well aware of the misery that awaited this writer in his gremlin-steeped Plymouth. At least it looked like it had a trunk.

Think back to your early years. What was your No. 2 choice when you parted with those first car-buying bucks? Do you regret not springing for it?

[Images: Ford, Murilee Martin/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • Loguesmith Loguesmith on May 15, 2019

    Mine was not so much the "one that got away", but the "one I got". I'll let you judge how it all went down. The year was 1985. I was in my final semester of college, and I totaled my '79 Pontiac Sunbird. I got $2000 from the insurance company. What to do? I found a new car that ticked all my boxes. Economical, practical, new car warranty. I negotiated a deal for the $2000 up front and $150/mo, with the first payment deferred 90 days so I would hopefully have a steady income after graduation. Ran the plan past my folks, and they shot it down, as I didn't yet have a job lined up. They suggested I pick up something cheap with the insurance money, then if/when I got work, I could get a new or newer car at that point. I followed their advice, ended up moving back to my hometown with a new job, and bought a year old car with 17,000 miles on it. The "one that got away"? New Ford Escort Diesel The "one I got"? Year old Honda Accord LX I think I dodged a bullet with that one.

  • WallMeerkat WallMeerkat on May 16, 2019

    First car was a Renault Clio (successor to LeCar) that my uncle found ridiculously cheap. Lasted 6 months before stalling and getting rear ended by a 5 series. Second car then had to happen. I looked at a Peugeot 405 diesel but was unused to the diesel characteristics and thought it idled rough. Passed it over for a Ford Orion that was a complete lemon that I ended up scrapping. I then replaced that horrible Ford with a Citroen that had the same engine as the Peugeot I should've bought, it was reliable and economical (50+mpg) and lasted me for years, from my student days through my 1st and 2nd full time jobs.

  • Akear Does anyone care how the world's sixth largest carmaker conducts business. Just a quarter century ago GM was the world's top carmaker. [list=1][*]Toyota Group: Sold 10.8 million vehicles, with a growth rate of 4.6%.[/*][*]Volkswagen Group: Achieved 8.8 million sales, growing sharply in America (+16.6%) and Europe (+20.3%).[/*][*]Hyundai-Kia: Reported 7.1 million sales, with surges in America (+7.9%) and Asia (+6.3%).[/*][*]Renault Nissan Alliance: Accumulated 6.9 million sales, balancing struggles in Asia and Africa with growth in the Americas and Europe.[/*][*]Stellantis: Maintained the fifth position with 6.5 million sales, despite substantial losses in Asia.[/*][*]General Motors, Honda Motor, and Ford followed closely with 6.2 million, 4.1 million, and 3.9 million sales, respectively.[/*][/list=1]
  • THX1136 A Mr. J. Sangburg, professional manicurist, rust repairer and 3 times survivor is hoping to get in on the bottom level of this magnificent property. He has designs to open a tea shop and used auto parts store in the facility as soon as there is affordable space available. He has stated, for the record, "You ain't seen anything yet and you probably won't." Always one for understatement, Mr. Sangburg hasn't been forthcoming with any more information at this time. You can follow the any further developments @GotItFiguredOut.net.
  • TheEndlessEnigma And yet government continues to grow....
  • TheEndlessEnigma Not only do I not care about the move, I do not care about GM....gm...or whatever it calls itself.
  • Redapple2 As stated above, gm now is not the GM of old. They say it themselves without realizing it. New logo: GM > gm. As much as I dislike my benefactor (gm spent ~ $200,000 on my BS and MS) I try to be fair, a smart business makes timely decisions based on the reality of the current (and future estimates) situation. The move is a good one.
Next