Tesla's $35k Model 3 Destined to Be a Ghost

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you can find a Tesla store (that’s still open), and someone working in it, maybe you can buy … a Model 3 Standard Range.

Yes, the $35k car promised three years ago during the Model 3’s launch, and hyped to infinity in the months and years since, stands to become as shadowy and elusive as the A-Team. In yet another raft of changes to its Model 3 line announced Thursday night, the automaker ensured the Standard model’s status as a rare bird.

Offered by a company that’s moved to online ordering, the Standard model will not be available for ordering online. Hey, don’t be confused — there’s a solid explanation!

But first, a brief history lesson.

In late February, Tesla opened orders for the Standard and Standard Plus (220 and 240 miles of range, respectively), claiming customers could expect deliveries to begin in two to four weeks. Then something odd happened: Customers began receiving Standard Plus models, but the Standard was nowhere to be seen. Reports emerged of Standard customers receiving delay messages from Tesla reps via text message, some of them with open-ended timelines, with many claiming they were then pressured into upgrading to a Standard Plus.

Last night, the Tesla announced that the model no one has taken delivery of, and which it did its best to dissuade anyone from buying, just wasn’t very popular.

“Since [last quarter], Standard Plus has sold at more than six times the rate of Standard, far exceeding our expectations,” the company said in a blog post.

“Given the popularity of the Standard Plus relative to the Standard, we have made the decision to simplify our production operations to better optimize cost, minimize complexity and streamline operations. As a result, Model 3 Standard will now be a software-limited version of the Standard Plus, and we are taking it off the online ordering menu, which just means that to get it, customers will need to call us or visit any one of the several hundred Tesla stores. Deliveries of Model 3 Standard will begin this weekend.”

At the same time, Tesla realized that Autopilot saves lives and is really popular, so it’s making it standard kit on the Standard Plus, pushing that model’s price from $37,500 to $39,500. Previously, buyers would have to rustle up another three grand to add the capability. It’s a bargain!

And for those Standard Range holdouts who Ubered to their local Tesla store, presumably passing a billboard reading “Tesla Model 3 Standard Range buyers aren’t cool” along the way, to give their sales rep the secret handshake, there’s more good news. Because the Standard is just a Standard Plus with a software-imposed wet blanket, they can unlock the extra range, heated seats, nav, and that standard Autopilot at any time, so long as they make up the price difference between the two models.

To those who worried Tesla might be in dire need of cash, your fears were unfounded.

And it’s not just the model that Tesla CEO Elon Musk said might sink the company if offered too early that’s disappearing from the internet, either. The cheapest Long Range model also drops from the online ordering menu.

Tesla claims that “customers will also need to call or visit a Tesla store to get Model 3 Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive.”

“We’re making these changes to ensure that our online order process is focused exclusively on the three Model 3 variants customers want most,” Tesla continued, without adding “*wink*” to its copy.

There’s a leasing program, too, but don’t expect to make an offer once the term is up.

“Beginning today, customers in the U.S. will be able to lease Model 3 for a small down payment and competitive monthly payments. Customers can choose any Model 3 variant and select an annual mileage option of 10,000, 12,000, or 15,000 miles,” the automaker stated, adding, “Please note, customers who choose leasing over owning will not have the option to purchase their car at the end of the lease, because with full autonomy coming in the future via an over-the-air software update, we plan to use those vehicles in the Tesla ride-hailing network.”

One wonders if anyone leasing a Standard Range will be asked to upgrade partway through the term.

(Update: No, they won’t – as the Standard Range is not available to lease. Lease offers start with the Standard Plus, with Tesla asking $3,199 due at signing and $504/month for 36 months. That works out to $21,343 over the term, and remember, you can’t keep the car.)

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 53 comments
  • Gedrven Gedrven on Apr 12, 2019

    Elon set out to change the world and ended up sucked into the same quasi-fraudulent sales and marketing tactics of the old guard. For shame. As with airline ticket "overbooking", it should be considered actionable fraud to sell something you knowingly don't have, or at least make a bona fide effort to deliver in the future. It should also be considered false advertising to state a price that is anything other than the money the buyer has to give the seller to get the product.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Apr 13, 2019

    It's foolish for Tesla to chase a low base price. Tesla is a luxury brand and the Model 3 is a $45k car and everyone knows that. Sure, you can pay less if you ace-of-base it, or you can pay a lot more if you want to humilate Ferraris with the Pitbull-Featuring-Ludacris trim, but for most buyers...$45k. That's low enough to be a damn good value for what you get, yet high enough to price lots of people out of the running --- the magic combination for aren't-we-the-smart-money snob appeal. Snob appeal sells these cars. Insisting they're available cheap --- while doing the modern equivalent of hiding the newspaper-ad car under a tarp behind the body shop --- damages the brand image. Why keep doing it? Probably because investors are enamored with the long-term vision of affordable EVs for everyone, and the stock's value is based on that idea. But as Nissan, Chevy, Tesla, and VW have learned, building an EV that's both cheap and appealing is extremely challenging. When cars first became widespread, the average Joe drove a rickety Ford, not a supercharged Duesenberg. Today the average Joe drives a Corolla, not a Lexus LS. When EVs eventually become the default, the average Joe will be tooling around in a Nissan Leaf or VW e-Up or Geometry A or whatever, not a fast sexy Tesla. And that's fine.

    • See 2 previous
    • Manic Manic on Apr 14, 2019

      @SCE to AUX Except taxpayers' money is only part of OPM Tesla is experimenting with.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next