Buy/Drive/Burn: A Rear-drive C-body Showdown in 1980

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

A few months ago we selected a General Motors C-body from the three on offer in the mid-1990s, right at the end of the front-drive platform’s lifespan. Today’s trio is a variation on that theme, as suggested long ago by commenter Sgeffe.

He wanted to talk about rear-drive C-platform offerings — the full-size GMs available shortly before everything started going awry for the large sedan customer. Let’s go.

Buick Electra

Before the Roadmaster was recognized as Buick’s largest offering in the 1990s, the Electra held the banner as the company’s flagship. In its fifth generation for the 1977 model year, Electra and the other C-body offerings shrunk around 10 inches in length. Malaise and downsizing had taken hold! The 1980 model year saw a diesel engine added to the options list, as well as the availability of the Oldsmobile 307 V8 (today’s selection). 1980 was also the last year for the three-speed TH350 transmission; GM switched to a four-speed THM200 in 1981. Other changes this year included a grille with vertical slats and the deletion of “225” from the Electra’s badging. 1980 would also be the last year the Electra wore ventiports along its fenders. Length: 220.9″

Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight

Oldsmobile’s flagship Ninety-Eight model entered its 10th generation in 1977, increasing interior head and legroom even as exterior dimensions shrank. The Ninety-Eight realized some extensive exterior renovations for the 1980 model year. Aerodynamics and fuel economy required a more downward-sloped hood and a higher trunk. The overall effect was a chunkier, heavy-looking car. Ninety-Eight customers could select from LS or Regency trims on their sedan; today we’ve selected the Regency with a 307 V8. Vinyl roofs and opera lamps are good things. Length: 221.4″

Cadillac Sedan de Ville

The DeVille played the entry-level role to the smaller Seville and larger Fleetwood Brougham sedan (and limousine) in Cadillac’s lineup. 1977 happened to be the 75th anniversary of the Cadillac brand, and the Detroit company celebrated by downsizing everything. The new DeVille lost nine inches in length and about 1,000 pounds over the outgoing model. Like the Oldsmobile, interior dimensions increased. Customers in 1977 saw a DeVille which had to forego the formality of fender skirts for the first time. Rakish! Grille changes for 1978 accompanied slimmer tail lamp designs. An aluminum hood arrived in 1979, along with another new grille. For 1980 the DeVille received the same aerodynamic treatment as the Oldsmobile at the front and rear. Customers could also select a (4.1L) V6 engine — the first time the company dipped below eight cylinders since 1914. Most customers opted for the new 368 CID V8 engine, with its six-liter displacement. It was selected here, as well. Length: 221″

Traditional, restrained, or festooned — which one gets the Buy?

[Images: General Motors]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 90 comments
  • EBFlex Garbage but for less!
  • FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
  • RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
  • Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
  • Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Next