Buy/Drive/Burn: The 1993 C-body Showdown to End All Showdowns

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
buy drive burn the 1993 c body showdown to end all showdowns

I’ve been saving this one for a while on my Big List of Buy/Drive/Burns. The year is 1993, and you’re shopping the large front-drive sedan offerings from General Motors (rear-drive provides less traction and is archaic). Making a stop at the Oldsmobile, Buick, and Cadillac showrooms, three ruched leather and wood tone sedans await you in top-spec trim. Let’s go.

The ’93 model year was selected because it was the last where all three GM brands had a C-body. For ’94, the DeVille moved on to the Northstar-ready K-body and lost the Touring Sedan variant for a while.

Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight Regency Elite

The Ninety-Eight remained at the top of the sedan offerings for Oldsmobile throughout its final 1991-1996 generation. GM didn’t fit the Rocket brand with its own rear-drive B-body sedan, but opted for the Custom Cruiser estate as its B-body for ’91 and ’92. Ninety-Eight’s Regency Elite trim was introduced for ’92, and came with Buick’s supercharged 3800 L67 engine. The Oldsmobile was the tech marvel of our trio: digital gauges, copious button count, and many trip computer functions across the very horizontal dashboard. Prominence faded from Ninety-Eight by 1995, when the Aurora took over as the new hotness flagship from Oldsmobile.

Buick Park Avenue Ultra

Buick’s C-body is the most upright and traditional of the C-bodies on offer today. Introduced in 1991 next to the Ninety-Eight, the Park Avenue shed its former Electra restraints and struck out on its own. Initially available only in standard trim, Ultra came along a year later. All Ultra models were loaded up, featuring the same supercharged 3800 you’d find in the Oldsmobile. The Park Avenue sat in second place on the Buick model list, slotted beneath the rear-drive Roadmaster. While its interior proved more conservative than the Oldsmobile’s, it was also easier to use. No digital gauge frippery here.

Cadillac DeVille Touring Sedan

The only way to get a V8 (4.9 impressive liters) in your C-body was to head over to the Cadillac showroom. The elder statesman here, DeVille models were part of the first wave of mid-eighties downsizing. It was all new for ’85, as Deville swapped rear-drive for front-drive. The Deville Touring took an interesting mid-pack place in the Cadillac lineup for ’93, above the standard DeVille, but underneath the front-drive Fleetwood and Sixty Special, and rear-drive B-body Fleetwood Brougham. Lengthening and modernization occurred in ’89 and ’91, bringing the DeVille in line with its C-body brethren. Speed-sensitive steering and traction control came standard on the Touring Sedan, as well as special camel-colored leather seats. The conservative interior was rounded out with a horizontal speedometer and minimal buttons and instrumentation. Exterior features included a lack of hood ornament, special Touring wheels, and minimal exterior chrome decoration.

Three flavors of GM’s finest sedan offering of the ’90s. Which one goes home for keeps?

[Images: General Motors]

Join the conversation
2 of 86 comments
  • Delerium75 Delerium75 on May 04, 2018

    The normally aspirated 3800 was standard on all 98s in '93. Only the 98 Touring Sedan had the supercharged 3.8 available as an was not available on the Elite.

  • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on May 09, 2018

    Burn the Olds. This is most definitely "Your Grandfathers Oldsmobile" and it's just too old looking. Drive the Cadillac. Plain (compared to the others), I have a soft spot for Cadillacs thanks to my 84 Eldo and my folks 94 Deville Concours. In blue collar Pittsburgh, a Cadillac in those days always got more of nod to "making it" than the other two. Buy the Buick- None of these are stellar automobiles compared to their forebearers wearing the same badge. But the Buick doesn't look as Old as the Olds nor as rich as the Caddy. Supercharged 3800 would have more than enough oomph compared to the 4.9 if not the smoothness, though I did like the sound of the 4.9

  • EBFlex Such insane demand for government cars yet companies are laying people off and others are losing billions upon billions. Crazy
  • Chuck Norton I don't see anything wrong with the name. It's an impressive little motor-and despite the fact that it has been hammered on every vehicle forum-including this one it seems to be gaining market acceptance.
  • Spookiness Other non-US markets get the Forte5 "liftback" version of this. That would be a perfect size for me and I'd consider it if it were available. I think they're good looking and good value.
  • 28-Cars-Later We have arrived.
  • MrIcky Unimogs