A Question of Lust: Toyota Unwraps the Camry and Avalon TRD

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You’ve seen teasers all week, suffered through breathless commentary from NASCAR drivers, but it’s finally time. The big day has arrived. On Friday, Toyota pulled the remaining wraps off its Camry TRD and Avalon TRD, highlighting the features of its tricked-out sedans ahead of their official debut at the LA Auto Show.

Jokes aside, the TRD treatment applied to this pair is more than just an appearance upgrade, even if buyers aren’t the recipient of additional ponies. Positioned as an aspirational model for those who want more from their sensible, front-drive sedan, the TRD duo is designed to hold the road and stop faster. They’re also made to draw eyes to two models that, despite their heritage, remain just as vulnerable to changing consumer tastes as other sedans.

But are these really “the track-tuned sedans that enthusiasts have been asking for,” as Toyota claims?


I’d hazard a guess that the appearance of Toyota’s racing arm in the mainstream passenger car field is more likely to sway an already committed Camry or Avalon intender into upgrading, rather than bringing in outside buyers. An upsell via the eyes and ears, if you will.

The changes bestowed upon the new-for-2018 Camry and new-for-2019 Avalon in TRD spec are many. They include upgraded brakes with 12.9-inch front rotors and red, dual-piston binders (apparently borrowed, sans paint, from the Sienna minivan, as per Bozi Tatarevic), with 12-inch/single-piston binders in the rear.

Power in both sedans comes by way of an untouched 3.5-liter V6 generating the same 301 horsepower and 267 lb-ft of torque you’ll find in stock, non-hybrid Avalons and higher-end Camrys. Sport mode and paddle shifters come as part of the package, not that the latter feature stands to see much use. The only transmission is, apparently, a similarly unmolested eight-speed automatic — a unit your author finds fault with for laggy downshifts.

Once those ponies start charging, you’ll at least hear them. Unlike the questionable, audio-enhanced engine growl (I never noticed much of one) in the Avalon XSE, these rides benefit from a cat-back exhaust for a more menacing aural experience.

Improved roadholding comes by way of half-inch wider, 19×8.5-inch wheels shod with Bridgestone Potenza 235/40R19 summer rubber, with new, stiffer springs bringing a 0.6-inch reduction in ride height. Those springs pair with beefier front and rear sway bars, TRD shocks, and enhanced underbody bracing for decreased roll and bolstered body stiffness. Just how stiff these legs are off the track remains to be seen.

Of course, no bystander’s likely to notice those chassis upgrades on the street, but the aero enhancements detailed already on these pages will get their attention. The body kit applied to both models includes a front splitter, side aero skirts, trunk lid spoiler (mercifully low-profile on the Avalon), and rear diffuser. Red-line TRD strips underscore the add-ons both inside and out. And just look at those red seatbelts. Certainly, no passenger will be able to miss the TRD badge stitched or stamped onto various interior surfaces, and there’s even a trunk mat to remind them of the car’s unique nature.

Paint choices total four: Supersonic Red, Windchill Pearl, Celestial Silver Metallic, and Midnight Black Metallic, with the first three shades coming in a two-tone layout on the Camry.

While Toyota doesn’t list a price for these two beasts, expect the TRD treatment to run at least an additional three grand on top of the XSE trim. Availability comes in the fall of 2019, when both vehicles land as 2020 models.

[Images: Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 34 comments
  • Daniel J Daniel J on Nov 17, 2018

    No Android auto, no sale for me.

    • Brn Brn on Nov 18, 2018

      It's interesting that we've reached a point where an infotainment feature is a deal breaker.

  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Nov 19, 2018

    The red Avalon is a perfect example of how ugly a front end can be. If I had one I would lose a lot of weight because I would puke every time I went out to the garage and saw it. I can't think of an uglier car from recent times. Given the hate I have for oblesks in the middle of the dash, I would still buy a Stinger over this if that were the only choice.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next