Tesla Places Pointless 'Self-Driving' Option On Hiatus

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Tesla Motors is abandoning the “fully self-driving” purchasing option on all of its vehicles. The option debuted in 2016 as a way to ensure your new car would be future-proofed and able to incorporate autonomous features. But those upgrades never really came — leaving customers who spent $8,000 angry enough to file a class-action lawsuit against the company for failing to deliver on its promises. At least they still got those EV tax credits and free access to the company’s fancy new Autopilot chip (which is also a bit of a mystery item).

The option appears to have been removed from Tesla’s website this week — prompting customers to ask CEO Elon Musk what was up after he announced a rejiggering of the Model 3 lineup. According to a tweet from Musk, the self-driving option was removed because it “was causing too much confusion.”

Well, whose fucking fault was that?

While we can praise Tesla for beating the odds and being the first automaker to make electric vehicles trendy and relatively easy to live with, it’s been pretty irresponsible about how it markets advanced driving aids. Autopilot may be one of the best driver-assistance packages on the market, but the name has encouraged some motorists to take a hands-off approach while using it. Likewise, the “fully self-driving” option turned out to be a flat-out lie — even if it was an unintentional one.

Consumer Watchdog and The Center for Auto Safety became noticeably upset about this, issuing a letter to the Federal Trade Commission on what they considered “deceptive and unfair practices in advertising and marketing” on the part of Tesla’s marketing team.

Tesla has had some understandable setbacks within its autonomous development team, stalling overall progress. But it had to know it wouldn’t be ready for quite some time and that consumer patience has limits when it introduced the self-driving option two years ago. While it may be a relatively fresh-faced automaker in the grand scheme of things, it’s not unreasonable to hold it to the same standard as established manufacturers on something like this. Tesla isn’t alone in over-promising autonomy right now. Still, no other automaker offered to charge customers for tech that didn’t yet exist in their vehicles.

According to Bloomberg, the option is likely only taking a temporary leave of absence. Last month, Elon notified employees that Tesla needed about 100 more staffers to join an internal testing program for full self-driving capabilities. We’ll have to see if that’s actually what happens, as rumors state Tesla would need additional hardware to achieve level 4 autonomy.

Let’s also not forget that Musk promised that Version 9 of Autopilot would “ enable full self-driving features” last June. That update has already been launched via the company’s over-the-air updates. We know it stepped up road and sign recognition but has anyone out there noticed their Model S making solo trips to the store? Maybe you also have to buy the $5,000 chip when it comes out.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Master Baiter Master Baiter on Oct 22, 2018

    I heard Tesla also removed cold fusion and perpetual motion from their pay now, deliver later options list. . .

    • Sgtjmack Sgtjmack on Oct 22, 2018

      They only removed "cold fusion" because they were going to name their next model that, and didn't want to confuse people into thinking it was a new Ford model.

  • Akear Akear on Dec 12, 2019

    This over-hyped self driving feature makes the car a death trap. It is that simple.

  • Lou_BC I read an interesting post by a master engine builder. He's having a hard time finding quality parts anywhere. The other issue is most young men don't want to learn the engine building trade. He's got so much work that he will now only work on engines his shop is restoring.
  • Tim Myers Can you tell me why in the world Mazda uses the ugliest colors on the MX5? I have a 2017 in Red and besides Black or White, the other colors are horrible for a sports car. I constantly hear this complaint. I wish someone would tell whoever makes theses decisions that they need a more sports car colors available. They’d probably sell a lot more of them. Just saying.
  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
Next