Tesla's Wild Second Quarter: Revenue Up, Losses Up, Cash Burn Down, and Some Head-scratching Statements

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tesla announced Wednesday that it lost $743 million in the second quarter of 2018, instantly pushing the automaker’s stock up by nearly double digit figures. No, this particular tidbit isn’t what investors hoped to hear, but CEO Elon Musk, who, unlike in past weeks, made it through the day without saying something overtly controversial, told them enough of what they wanted to hear.

The company’s revenue is up by over a billion dollars compared to the same quarter a year ago — $4 billion as a pre-tax total. Cash on hand was the lowest Tesla’s seen in two years ($2.2 billion), but the automaker’s reduced cash burn impressed some skeptics and reassured believers in Musk’s pledge to return to a positive cash flow in the third and fourth quarters. Having achieved its 5,000-Model-3s-per-week production goal, Tesla claims volume will crank up to 6,000 per week by late August. 10,000 per week comes in 2019.

There was even an apology from Musk for his bizarre behavior during a May earnings call, in which he snubbed analysts while acting like a bored teenager.

And did you know the Model 3 outsells all premium midsize sedans combined? Yeah, about that…

There’s other negatives buried in Tesla’s Q2 report — among them an anticipated impact on volume in China (due to a 40 percent tariff), the looming phase-out of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit (next year), and reduced customer deposits (new variants of the Model 3 will reverse it in Q3, Tesla insists) — but the midsize sedan segment statement needs to be dealt with.

“In July 2018, Model 3 not only had the #1 market share position in its segment in the US, it outsold all other mid-sized premium sedans combined, accounting for 52% of the segment overall,” the company wrote. “The popularity of Model 3 is a true testament to the product.”

That last sentence is worthy of an online search for panel gaps, window malfunctions, and lengthy delays for service, all of which you’ll find on forums and subreddits. But what counts as the premium midsize sedan segment? What massive body of challengers did Tesla just wipe the floor with?

Turns out it’s just five vehicles. The BMW 3 Series, Mercedes-Benz C-Class, Audi A4, Jaguar XE, and Lexus IS. Just look at this graph:

As symmetrical as it is phallic, the graph is also glaring in its omissions. Where’s the Cadillac ATS? Infiniti Q50? Acura TLX? Volvo S60? Seems mighty selective.

But analysts weren’t pressing Musk on his company’s competition — it was production they wanted to hear about.

“A total vehicle output of 7,000 vehicles per week, or 350,000 per year, should enable Tesla to become sustainably profitable for the first time in our history – and we expect to grow our production rate further in Q3,” Tesla wrote in its letter to shareholders.

Model 3 production in the third quarter is pegged at 50,000-55,000, which actually works out to around 4,000 per week, implying some sort of downtime for the model’s two production lines. One of those lines (GA4) is housed in a tent — a makeshift structure Musk praised up and down. While he assured shareholders that Tesla’s Fremont assembly operation will not become a mainly outdoor affair, he sees no reason to change what’s happening in GA4.

A planned Gigafactory located in Shanghai will produce around 250,000 vehicles a year after it opens in three years’ time, the shareholder letter said, rising to 500,000 vehicles sometime after. The cost of the assembly plant would be funded through loans from local banks, Musk explained. The company’s also sourcing a location for a European facility.

Would the company hit its goal of 1 million vehicles in 2020? Musk responded by saying probably — though there’s a chance it might be as low as 750,000. He told analysts that Fremont can handle up to 600,000 vehicles, with Shanghai covering the rest.

Apparently the timeline for that Chinese plant differs depending on who Tesla, or Musk, is talking to.

[Image: Elon Musk/ Twitter]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Join the conversation
8 of 53 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 02, 2018

    We can debate the precise numbers, but it's interesting that a serious discussion can ensue about whether the Model 3 has outsold the BMW 3-Series only a year after TM3 production started. People can shout "Musk is a liar" all they want, but the arguments are now over thousands of cars, not a handful.

    • See 2 previous
    • Guitar man Guitar man on Aug 03, 2018

      @Art Vandelay ...and exporting IP to China is prohibited. The factory is never gunna happen.

  • Lockstops Lockstops on Aug 03, 2018

    Another blatant lie by Musk and Tesla: Those Model 3 vs other sedans numbers are not comparable numbers for the numerous reasons I pointed out in another thread: -Pent-up long-term demand being served in one avalanche right now after over a year of delays vs. most people choosing BMW already having theirs in the garage -Only one model in that price range vs. BMW having about a dozen different bodystyles (2-series in several bodystyles, 3-series, 4-series, 5-series, X1, X2, X3, X4…) So not only do BMW sales in that price range get divided up between many different models and different body styles of 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5 series but people nowadays mostly choose BMW SUVs instead of 3-series sedans, and of those in the price range there are 4 different models that divide up the sales. Tesla has no SUV in that price range so all of their demand is funneled into that one single sedan model whereas with BMW you have to add up about 8 different models’ sales to compare. And all of those are profitable while they are continuously developing at least 8 new replacement models and countless variations and personalisation options to them too as opposed to Tesla bumbling around with approximately zero options and who knows if they’re able to develop future replacements for that one model… -Domestic brand vs. foreign (look at Fiat sales numbers in Italy, Citroen in France etc…) -Model 3 is a brand new model vs. BMW 3-series is exactly now at the end of its model cycle. Tesla doesn't even get up to even a third of just BMW's offerings in that price range. And BMW is profitable even though they are spending and investing in what real companies are supposed to unlike the shambles of Tesla.

    • See 2 previous
    • Lockstops Lockstops on Aug 03, 2018

      Big3, you're a joke and a liar. There are hundreds of thousands more BMWs on American roads right now. If BMW were to stop all manufacturing immediately, wait a year, then release only three models then they would outsell Tesla's three models many times over, probably at least tenfold for at least a year. The fact that you and Tesla once again have to resort to lies and despicable deception in the face of an obvious truth tells a lot about you. This is just like the pathetic lie about 'Autonomous Teslas being safer than human drivers' which was infantile and spineless.

  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÜV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
  • Lorenzo A friend bought one of these new. Six months later he traded it in for a Chrysler PT Cruiser. He already had a 1998 Corvette, so I thought he just wanted more passenger space. It turned out someone broke into the SSR and stole $1500 of tools, without even breaking the lock. He figured nobody breaks into a PT Cruiser, but he had a custom trunk lock installed.
  • Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
  • Carson D Some of my friends used to drive Tacomas. They bought them new about fifteen years ago, and they kept them for at least a decade. While it is true that they replaced their Tacomas with full-sized pickups that cost a fair amount of money, I don't think they'd have been Tacoma buyers in 2008 if a well-equipped 4x4 Tacoma cost the equivalent of $65K today. Call it a theory.