Geely Readies Cash Dump to Turn Little Lotus Into a Major Player: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, the massive Chinese conglomerate that owns Volvo Cars and a controlling stake in Lotus, wants to turn the British sports car maker into a big deal. Potentially, a deal big enough to give Porsche bouts of anxiety.

That’s what sources with knowledge of Geely’s plans tell Bloomberg. The parent company’s efforts will reportedly include new facilities and assembly plants, funded by a cash injection totalling nearly $2 billion.

Geely wrestled control of Lotus away from Malaysia’s Proton in 2017, buying itself a 51-percent stake in the British brand. That stake might increase, the sources claim.

The report boils down to Geely chairman Li Shufu doing to Lotus what it did to Volvo after its acquisition of the Swedish brand in 2010. Colin Chapman’s baby stands to gain 200 engineers at its Hethel, UK headquarters and assembly facility as a first step in Shufu’s plan. Later, a second assembly plant will spring up, also located in the UK. A new UK design studio, already confirmed by Geely, will be part of the plan.

Lotus’s cash-flush parent wouldn’t go into details when contacted by Bloomberg, stating only that, “Geely is fully committed to restoring Lotus into being a leading global luxury brand.”

Currently, the automaker best known for building cars that ferried Emma Peel and Number 6 (at least in the opening credits) through the late 1960s builds just two vehicles: the Evora range and the outgoing 3-eleven, which isn’t road-legal in the United States. Hardly a dominating presence in the premium sports car market. Still, the brand’s products earn positive reviews, including from ol’ Bark.

For Lotus to make a bigger dent, it needs a bigger presence. That means more models, greater production volume — the whole works. While this report doesn’t mention new models, Lotus’ recently unveiled 10-year plan does. Future models include two new sports cars and an SUV, as no automaker can be without one in this day and age.

With a sport utility in its lineup, CEO Jean-Marc Gales believes little Lotus could boast sales of 10,000 vehicles per year — a six-fold increase from 2017’s tally.

[Image: Lotus Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Fred Fred on Aug 09, 2018

    I respect how Geely has handled Volvo and I hope they can keep Lotus going. Still others have tried with no success. Mostly tho, I wish I could find some good rubber donuts for my old Elan. They are a pain to replace and I shouldn't have to do it every couple of years.

  • Tstag Tstag on Aug 09, 2018

    According to reports in the U.K. Lotus are looking to build a car factory and design studio in Coventry. This is interesting because it is basically the home of Jaguar and Land Rover. If Lotus want to grow I think they’ve probably realised that all the engineers in the U.K. live miles away from Norfolk.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next