Is the Mazda CX-5 About to Go Turbocharged?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Where would Mazda be without the hot-selling CX-5? Of the 29,980 vehicles Mazda sold in the U.S. last month, 47.3 percent of them were CX-5s. Suffice it to say the stylish compact crossover is the brand’s most important model, regardless of what MX-5 fans would have you believe.

Parents everywhere applauded when a crisper, better-handling CX-5 appeared for 2017, content in knowing a family vehicle existed that wouldn’t relegate them to a world of bland conformity. Our own Chris Tonn was enraptured by the sight of his Grand Touring tester as it sat in an Ohio parking lot. Still, despite its on-road prowess, the zoom-zoom brand’s most popular offering isn’t exactly a pavement scorcher. That might not be the case for long.

According to a certification document from the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Mazda might offer the 2019 CX-5 with the turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder found in its larger CX-9 sibling. The doc shows emissions results from a 2.5-liter four boasting direct injection and forced induction, with its applications listed as the 2019 CX-5 and CX-9.

In the 2018 CX-9, this engine generates 227 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. Currently, CX-5 buyers choose from a 2.0-liter Skyactiv four-cylinder making 156 hp and 150 lb-ft, or a naturally aspirated 2.5-liter with 187 hp and 186 lb-ft. A delayed diesel’s on the way. Should Mazda grace us with a hot rod variant of its compact ute, buyers can expect a two-thirds increase in twist compared to the existing top-line powerplant.

Maybe it’s too much to ask that it come with a stick shift.

Of course, Mazda doesn’t make a habit of commenting on future products, and this case is no exception. We’re left to wait and see if our crossover dreams come true.

Sales of the CX-5 in America haven’t waned once during its time on the market. Each year since its 2012 debut saw more and more buyers line up at their local dealer, ready to fill Mazda’s coffers. This May saw the crossover’s sales rise 19.9 percent, year over year, with volume over the first five months of 2018 up a generous 43.7 percent.

H/T to Bozi Tatarevic!

[Images: Mazda, CARB]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 52 comments
  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Jun 19, 2018

    Would love to see this engine in a new MS3, but it seems Mazda has batten down the hatches to run a skeleton fleet. Still a little bummed nobody in the mainstream realm seems to be using hybrid tech to boost performance. Slap a 1kWh battery + 100kW motor in pretty much anything and you will have something interesting.

    • See 1 previous
    • AK AK on Jun 19, 2018

      @LeMansteve I would arge that a hybrid Brz/86 makes absolutely zero sense.

  • Igve2shtz Igve2shtz on Jun 19, 2018

    I said it a year ago. The 2.5T was not a good choice for the Mazda6 due to it's torque rich nature and lack of top end. Performance sedan owners want to wind out gears, have linear power delivery, and this engine was never designed for that application. I applaud Mazda for making this engine available in the 6, but it was never intended to be a Speed6 equivalent (no matter what journalists/forum members/car people said). But it will prove beneficial for golf foursomes who have had a few too many burgers at the local club, not for owners looking for a cheaper M3. Having driven it, the 2.5T is superb in the CX-9 because it operates where 90% of all drivers will play... below 5000 RPM. The power delivery of the 2.5T is superior to the 3.5 V6's of the competitor cars because it will help get the beast rolling when loaded down with the 6 passengers, or all the gear. The driver won't need to wind out the motor to make sufficient power when burdened down. As far as the CX-5? Yee-HAW!! For the same reasons of the CX-9 above, this will be a great motor in a great little car. Although sporty, I never got the desire to drive the CX-5/9 like I do my Mazdaspeed6. The power is there for passing, and when loaded down, and under normal circumstances, the engine will fade into the background like it should. In typical TTAC fashion, I can't wait to snag one of these up off lease in 2 years after a heck of a depreciation.

    • See 1 previous
    • Arach Arach on Jun 19, 2018

      @SixspeedSi I think for most buyers the "winding up" preference is dead. They want torque from a stop sign. They don't understand winding up and complain that the cars have too little power, just because they have to hit RPMs to enjoy them. My wife and I both love our 2.0t because it has MASSIVE power where you use it. We like it a lot more than our more powerful V6, because the V6 required winding up, and who has the opportunity to wind up a car in DD situations? not us. High torque at low RPMs is a winning combination for 99% of buyers IMHO.

  • Theflyersfan Having had some as loaners and rentals, and my sister and brother-in-law recently purchasing one, there was one thing left out. VW has to work on the quality of their plastics. Some of the materials feel as bad as 2002-era Nissan (an Altima 3.5SE on a test drive, with 7 miles on it, was already rattling and squeaking) especially on the doors and lower touch points. Some of the ongoing problems i had with my VW dealt with plastic quality - i had the overhead console buttons fall into the housing several times - and there were already squeaks at under 10,000 miles. They are so close with their cars and CUVs. They have designs people like. Just stop with the cheap plastics in so many obvious places. And if you touch the materials that make up the inside of the rear doors, you might be shocked how poor the quality is. Expect cargo to scratch the daylights out of the plastics.
  • Wjtinfwb CR-V Sport Hybrid or Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus money. I like the VW, just a bit more spirit than the Honda and a touch more room than the Mazda. But if I'm spending my own money the "sure thing" Honda or Mazda will get my checkbook, not a troublesome VW.
  • Tylanner The Tiguan is a perfectly fine appliance...and actually handsome.
  • Jkross22 The design and marketing people at Ford are doing a great job. When will engineering and QA catch up?
  • Bkojote For people asking why this over a full-size truck it's simple: Full Size Trucks are terrible off road. They'e too wide, don't articulate well, get stuck on mountain trails, require 20-point-turns, and their suspensions aren't up to the task. Ask any Texan who tries to take their F250 up Yankee Boy Basin. That said, I'm seeing $10k MSRP markups on these at all my local dealers. That's Tacoma Trailhunter territory - which gets 6MPG better, has big-boy ARB equipment, and is going to be bulletproof compared to anything Ford makes.
Next