QOTD: Ciao, Arrivederci - Can You Muster a Tear If Fiat Gets the Axe?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Pity the poor Fiat brand. The Italian marque’s return to the North American market was like a musket left out in the rain: The priming pan went up in a flash but the main powder charge failed to ignite.

Once the recession-battered public got its fill of the tiny, retro Cinquecento in 2011 and 2012, it was nowhere but down for the brand, despite Fiat Chrysler’s attempt to scratch buyers’ growing crossover itch with the admittedly attractive Jeep Renegade-based 500X. It doesn’t look like the 124 Spider’s gonna do the trick, either. A niche model from a niche brand with cratering sales and a massive backlog of unsold vehicles? That’s no Roman holiday.

So it came as no surprise when rumors cropped up of the brand’s looming North American demise at the hands of outgoing CEO Sergio Marchionne. Will you miss it?

In its present form, perhaps not. Not for this writer, anyway, though I’ll admit to only running in terror when a 500L drives by (a rare circumstance, for reasons stated above). The 500 was impossible to drive without cocking my head to the right at an unpleasant angle, and I’ve never been behind the wheel of the Spider (which at least boasts unlimited headroom for its occupants some of the time). We’ve had a few good things to say about the stillborn 500X.

Still, you don’t hear teenage boys lusting over an Abarth anything.

If the rumor becomes official on Friday, it spells the end of a longstanding headache for FCA dealers. In 2013, Fiat franchisees were crying out for new product. By 2016, they were begging for salvation. FCA responded by allowing standalone stores to shack up with neighboring Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram dealers, then poured on the cash for those left unwed. Trims got the axe, then prices. Standard turbocharged power in the 500 was the last gambit for the struggling brand.

There seems to be no way of getting buyers interested in Fiat, making its demise an inevitability. And it’s hard to miss what’s barely there. What does spark regret, however, is promise left unfulfilled — the departure of a quirky foreign brand that could have been so much more, had its parents’ interests not lay elsewhere.

In a past post, I laid out a couple of possible product solutions, though my dream of a low-cost purveyor of funky rear-drive sedans and coupes was a pipe dream in today’s market.

So, will there be a single tear shed if Marchionne chops the brand tomorrow?

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 72 comments
  • Hawox Hawox on Jun 01, 2018

    i live in italy and here fiat sells thanks to aggressive pricing on some cars (like punto wich is outperformed by competition). i can't understand how they manage to sell cars like the fiat 500L, also the overpriced fiat 500. they aren't fun to drive, nor spacious nor cheaper to maintain than competition. for sure i wouldn't buy one if i lived in the us

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Jun 04, 2018

    Yes, I'll miss them if they go. My 500e was the most enjoyable car I've owned, and I've owned a lot of fun cars. The 500X with the base powertrain (1.4T and stick) is a fun, cheap, useful car that cheerfully takes bumpy or windy roads in stride. The Abarths are a bratty, blatty blast. If it's hard to sell small cars, but you have to sell at least a few for CAFE reasons, then to me it makes sense to have a brand that attracts the specific people who like small cars, and that's FIAT. The brand has always stood for cheap to buy, fun to drive, cheekily stylish, and easy on gas. Send all the little cars to the FIAT store--just make sure they're fun to drive and stylish. Turbo all the things, install proper seats, and make every available trim package as snazzy as can be: lush chocolate brown pleather and fake chrome accents FTW. God help you trying to sell the Dart as a Dodge. But keep more of its Italian DNA intact, and you'd have a nice step-up model for the FIAT buyer with a baby on the way.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next