Expect a Future Fiat Chrysler With a Lot Less Fiats and Chryslers: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles CEO Sergio Marchionne, due to retire in less than a year’s time, will lay out the automaker’s future on Friday. Well, the next five years of its future — and we all know how malleable those plans can be.

According to a Bloomberg report, sources with knowledge of the plan say the near future contains far fewer Chryslers for those living outside the U.S., and no Fiats for those who are.

Not surprisingly, the bulk of FCA’s five-year strategy allegedly involves boosting the automaker’s strengths. That means Jeep, though the Ram brand helps pay a large portion of the company’s rent in North America. Globally, Jeep is FCA’s breadmaker, valued higher than the automaker itself, though Marchionne hopes to build Maserati into its own juggernaut, the sources claim.

What does the upcoming product plan, scheduled for a reveal at the Balocco test track near Turin on June 1st, mean for domestic buyers? It’s possible the threadbare Chrysler brand will become a North America-only brand. Meanwhile, the incredibly shrinking Fiat marque will eventually disappear from these shores, the sources claim.

Automotive News‘ Larry P. Vellequette predicts Marchionne will go a step further, killing off the storied (and now faded to a ghost) Chrysler brand altogether. It’s not difficult to share this opinion. There’s only two models in the brand’s stable right now, three if you include the Pacifica Hybrid as a standalone. Marchionne’s been cagey about the ancient 300’s future, rarely mentioning it when speaking of the 2021 platform swap bound for the Dodge Challenger and Charger. A mild refresh could come before its demise.

Not only that, we’ve seen no evidence of the Cherokee-based midsize crossover planned for a 2019 release. Under the previous plan, a full-size crossover would join that model for 2021. Two crossovers and a minivan? That’s some heritage…

As for Fiat, the brand’s re-entry into North America should appear in dictionaries next to “failure to launch.” Dealers can’t sell them, don’t want to have them, and buyers heartily agree. Fiat’s U.S. sales tumbled each year since the brand’s 2012 peak (its first full year on the market.) The introduction of the attractive 124 Spider roadster hasn’t set the brand on fire, nor does it look like greater standard power in the tiny 500 will do much to budge that model’s sales needle. It’s a dead brand… driving.

Another possible plank in FCA’s near-term plan is the consolidation of the Alfa Romeo and Maserati brands into a singly entity — at least in financial reports. It’s common knowledge that Marchionne wants a value-boosting spinoff for his Italian luxo-brands, but only after the divisions can stand on their own.

“The way we see it now, it’s almost impossible, if not impossible, to see a spin-off of Alfa Romeo/Maserati,” the CEO said last year, “these are two entities that are immature and in a development phase.”

As Bloomberg‘s report hasn’t been confirmed, we’ll just have to wait until Friday to see what brands our driving futures contain.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 49 comments
  • Sub-600 Sub-600 on May 31, 2018

    A retro AMC Eagle with the 5.7L and a manual would have people flocking to showrooms, probably showrooms of other manufacturers, but at least FCA could say they tried.

  • Oberkanone Oberkanone on May 31, 2018

    Long live Chrysler!

  • Marc Muskrat only said what he needed to say to make the stock pop. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Move along.
  • SCE to AUX I never believed they cancelled it. That idea was promoted by people who concluded that the stupid robotaxi idea was a replacement for the cheaper car; Tesla never said that.
  • 28-Cars-Later 2018 Toyota Auris: Pads front and back, K&N air filter and four tires @ 30K, US made Goodyears already seem inferior to JDM spec tires it came with. 36K on the clock.2004 Volvo C70: Somewhere between $6,5 to $8 in it all told, car was $3500 but with a wrecked fender, damaged hood, cracked glass headlight, and broken power window motor. Headlight was $80 from a yard, we bought a $100 door literally for the power window assembly, bodywork with fender was roughly a grand, brakes/pads, timing belt/coolant and pre-inspection was a grand. Roof later broke, parts/labor after two repair trips was probably about $1200-1500 my cost. Four 16in Cooper tires $62 apiece in 2022 from Wal Mart of all places, battery in 2021 $200, 6qts tranny fluid @ 20 is $120, maybe $200 in labor last year for tranny fluid change, oil change, and tire install. Car otherwise perfect, 43K on the clock found at 38.5K.1993 Volvo 244: Battery $65, four 15in Cooper tires @ $55 apiece, 4 alum 940 wheels @ roughly $45 apiece with shipping. Fixes for random leaks in power steering and fuel lines, don't remember. Needs rear door and further body work, rear door from yard in Gettysburg was $250 in 2022 (runs and drives fine, looks OK, I'm just a perfectionist). TMU, driven maybe 500 miles since re-acquisition in 2021.
  • 1995 SC I never hated these. Typical GM though. They put the wrong engine in it to start with, fixed it, and then killed it. I say that as a big fan of the aluminum 5.3, but for how they were marketing this it should have gotten the Corvette Motor at the start. Would be a nice cruiser though even with the little motor. The 5.3 without the convertible in a package meant to be used as a truck would have been great in my mind, but I suspect they'd have sold about 7 of them.
  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
Next