Sheer Magnetism: Toyota's Plan for a Cheaper EV Involves Hard-to-pronounce Words

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
sheer magnetism toyotas plan for a cheaper ev involves hard to pronounce words

If buyers really do plan to line up to buy electric vehicles, even before the government forces them to, automakers had best figure out a way to make them affordable not just to buy, but to build.

We all know battery packs are expensive (with ingredients clouded by child labor and environmental issues), but batteries are only part of the equation. While simple in operation, electric motors are nothing like the aluminum or iron affairs under the hood of your dad’s Buick Enclave. There’s a lot of metals you’ve never heard of in a permanent magnet AC motor.

Toyota, which wants to be an electric car bigshot, just figured out a way to make a cheaper motor.

In a Tokyo briefing Tuesday morning, Toyota claimed its motors will contain half the normal amount of rare earth metals. Unless you’re ordering a steak, “rare” usually implies scarcity. With automakers diving headlong into EV production, such metals will surely rise in price. In fact, some already have. That’s not good for long-term planning.

Electric motors found in EVs use magnetism to create rotational energy, which is then transferred to the axle shafts and drive wheels. Without straying too far into the technological weeds, the motor utilizes magnets, along with alternating current, to create a rotating magnetic field with which to spin the rotor, thus creating a means of propulsion. And batteries aren’t the cheapest things in the world.

Toyota’s plan is to eliminate the use of terbium and dysprosium in these magnets, and halve the use of neodymium. (Hands up if you’ve ever heard of these metals.) The automaker expects neodymium demand to outstrip supply by 2025, making it a good time to start leaving it in the rear-view. Instead of these rare earth metals, Toyota will use lanthanum and cerium. Both of these metals are 20 percent cheaper and less likely to skyrocket in price as EV sales rise.

In preparation for this electrified future, the automaker will instruct its suppliers to build these bargain basement magnets. The company, which still doesn’t have a battery electric vehicle on the market, plans to make up for lost time and field “more than 10” full-on EVs by the early 2020s. By 2025, the automaker expects to have an electrified version of every model in its lineup.

Measures like this, when paired with the declining price of lithium-ion batteries and economies of scale, should help Toyota turn a profit on EVs one day, instead of taking a hit for the sake of green optics and CAFE rules.

[Source: Bloomberg] [Image: Toyota]

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 12 comments
  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Feb 21, 2018

    How long have hybrids been in significant production? How long have there been stories about consequent rise in prices for the materials used in their batteries etc.? How much of a problem has actually resulted? Child labour is a problem in all sorts of industries. Should we stop buying leather goods because of child labor in the toxic tanning business? Should ev's be banned until child labor is eradicated? Surely there is child labor in the materials used for computer devices in regular cars. Certainly exploitation of children and anyone else should be stopped. Exploitation of children can also include being run down by motorists, forcing them to suffer all sorts of pollutants from burning gas and diesel, not to mention the consequences of global warming.

    • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Feb 21, 2018

      The problem is that most hybrid and EV buyers (and the politicians the subsidize them) think they are saving the world by driving vehicles made from organic fairy dust and running on angel farts. The reality is the vehicles are dirtier to produce than conventional cars, use materials from some nasty parts of the world, and will be generating a lot more nasty waste products when they are scrapped. They are also more likely to run down children because they emit less noise. Some of these problems are being solved (such as mandated noise makers on EVs or substitution of materials in electric motors), but they are not the environmental panacea that they are made out to be by wishful thinkers such as yourself - if they were so wonderful they wouldn't need subsidies and all the world's automakers would be eagerly and voluntarily switching over immediately.

  • Joeaverage Joeaverage on Feb 21, 2018

    So once these materials are in the recycle mechanism, they won't need to be mined as much - right?

    • Redmondjp Redmondjp on Feb 21, 2018

      You don't know how electrical and electronic items get recycled, do you? Think kids in a rural village melting IC chips off of circuit boards over an open fire, and then boiling said chips in a pot of battery acid (poured out of old car batteries we also send there) to dissolve the plastic overmolding so they can extract the hair-thin gold wires bonding the die to the leadframe. Not to mention the same kids, while waiting for the plastic to dissolve, unwinding copper off of all kinds of electric motors, solenoids, and the like. And of course everything left over after extracting the gold and copper gets either burnt or dumped onto the ground. So much for saving the planet!

  • Dave M. Although the effective takeover by Daimler is pooped upon, this is one they got right. I wasn't a fan of the LHs, mostly due to reported mechanical, NVH and build quality issues, but I though Chrysler hit it out of the park with the LXs. The other hyped release that year was the Ford Five Hundred, which, while a well-built car with superior interior space, couldn't hold a candle to the 300.
  • Art Vandelay I always liked those last FWD 300's. Been ages since I've seen one on the road though. Lots of time in the RWD ones as rentals. No complaints whatsoever.
  • Cardave5150 I've had 2 different 300's - an '08 300SRT and an '18 300C. Loved them both a LOT, although, by the time I had the second one, I wasn't altogether thrilled with the image of 300's out on the street, as projected by the 3rd or 4th buyers of the cars.I always thought that the car looked a little stubby behind the rear wheels - something that an extra 3-4" in the trunk area would have greatly helped.When the 300 was first launched, there were invitation-only meet-and-greets at the dealerships, reminding me of the old days when new model-year launches were HUGE. At my local dealer, they were all in formalwear (tuxes and elegant dresses) with a nice spread of food. They gave out crystal medallions of the 300 in a sweet little velvet box (I've got mine around the house somewhere). I talked to a sales guy for about 5 minutes before I asked if we could take one of the cars out (a 300C with the 5.7 Hemi). He acted like he'd been waiting all evening for someone to ask that - we jumped in the car and went out - that thing, for the time, seemed to fly.Corey - when it comes time for it, don't forget to mention the slightly-stretched wheelbase 300 (I think it was the 300L??). I've never found one for sale (not that I've looked THAT hard), as they only built them for a couple of years.
  • Jkross22 "I’m doing more for the planet by continuing to drive my vehicle than buying a new one for strictly frivolous reasons."It's not possible to repeat this too much.
  • Jeff S Got to give credit to Chrysler for putting the 300 as a rear wheel drive back on the market. This will be a future classic.
Next