As Tesla Model 3 Reservation Holders Wait (and Wait and Wait), GM Says It'll Play Nice

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The number of people willing to plunk down a $1,000 deposit for a Tesla Model 3 currently stands at about 455,000. In the third quarter of 2017, Tesla delivered 220 units of its smallest and most affordable electric car. Last quarter, some 1,550 buyers took ownership.

If it looks like it’s shaping up to be a long wait for the newest reservation holders, you’re right. Tesla claims it has succeeded in working out some of the issues hampering production at its Fremont, California assembly plant, but the pushed-back ramp-up of Model 3 production means some reservation holders won’t see their new car this decade. Meanwhile, you can not only walk into a General Motors dealer and order a Chevrolet Bolt today, but you can expect delivery well before the 2020 election campaign gets into full swing.

Is GM planning to exploit its competitor’s production woes? Not us, the automaker claims.

Speaking to Automotive News, Steve Majoros, marketing director of Chevrolet cars and crossovers, said a targeted campaign is “not in the cards.”

If it did, it wouldn’t be first time an automaker tried to lure Model 3 groupies away from the band. In early 2016, Nissan launched an ad aimed at those waiting for Tesla’s upcoming wundersedan. “Why wait when you can drive an all-electric Nissan Leaf today?” the cheeky company stated, hammering the point home by saying, “No one should have any reservations about getting an electric car today.”

Nissan also tossed incentives at would-be buyers in the hopes of picking up some fence sitters. of course, brand loyalty plays a big part in electric vehicle purchasing, and there’s no group of people more willing to wait for a car than Tesla devotees. Should any of these reservation holders grow tired of sitting by the phone, Nissan’s second-generation Leaf is currently waiting at the door, flowers in hand. It’s part of a growing segment that includes the Bolt and Hyundai Ioniq.

One of the reasons for GM’s attitude could be the Bolt’s strong sales numbers. Since availability reached all 50 states last summer, GM has seen Bolt sales rise each consecutive month. No need to rock the EV boat, perhaps. December saw the model top the 3,000-unit mark in the U.S. (3,227, to be exact), with volume for the whole year standing at 23,297 vehicles.

Both Bolt and Model 3 share a similar entry price, with the GM vehicle edging out the base Model 3 in terms of range. Pricier, 300-mile Long Range variants were first off the Tesla assembly line.

In a statement, Tesla claims it is “very appreciative” of the customers who “continue to stick by” the company. GM says a study group held last year showed early Bolt buyers remained fairly interested in the Model 3, though Majoros told AN that Chevy has seen an unspecified number of Tesla buyers show up looking for an EV. It’s quite possible that, in some cases, the Bolt is the model holding over the buyer until the Model 3 wait window closes.

In its quarterly update, Tesla said it expects to produce 3,000 Model 3s per week by the end of the second quarter of 2018. When production kicked off, the company hoped to hit that mark by the end of 2017.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 45 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Jan 08, 2018

    " Tesla claims it has succeeded in working out some of the issues hampering production " Someone found the on-off switch on that Michigan-made pre-built production line, perhaps? Sedan sales are falling off everywhere, but up to 445,000 deposit-waving semi-delusional folk like them just fine in Model 3 duds. They want to be part of a religious movement. Judging by the 550 per month build rate in QTR 4, they're being built by people wielding rubber mallets and tinsnips while trireme-trained taskmasters flick whips over the straining crew. Of course, the official reason is that the Gigafactory cannot weld those cells into battery packs quickly enough. This charade has gone on long enough, surely. It's time to sh!t or get off the pot when you are so vertically integrated, responsible for most of the bits and pieces yourself. Next we'll find out that the $35K price really was a come-on.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jan 09, 2018

      Are you saying that because sedans are losing popularity, Model 3 buyers have a misplaced interest in that car and really ought to buy a CUV? Is it possible they just prefer low operating costs in a nice-looking car that does 0-60 in 4.7 seconds? No, that's not possible; it must be a religious thing because stereotypes work best on TTAC.

  • John Horner John Horner on Jan 08, 2018

    About a year ago I took a tour of Tesla's factory. The tour guides were oh so proud of how the company had reinvented automotive manufacturing. Meanwhile I was wondering why they were turning out one vehicle per hour from a factory Toyota used to make one vehicles per 30 seconds in. It is cliche, but still true, so say that Toyota has forgotten more about high quality volume production than Tesla management knows.

    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jan 09, 2018

      John, I think the biggest problem at Tesla is Musk. His visions, which he has many visions (some are interesting) are complicating the production side of his business. Musk should just let the subject matter experts do their job. He must listen to them. I think the best chance anyone has of ever seeing a Model 3 is someone/s need to force Musk into offloading Tesla. I had a "Big Al" vision, many will lose lots of money soon in Tesla or dealing with Tesla. I think Sergio is a far better operator than Musk.

  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
  • ChristianWimmer The body kit modifications ruined it for me.
  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
Next