Put 'er in Low: Ford's Crash-diving Transmission Earns Another Investigation

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In 2016, Ford Motor Company’s stable of rear-drive vehicles came under scrutiny for six-speed transmissions that couldn’t decide whether to sprint or crawl. Owners reported that their 2011-2012 F-150s, Expeditions, Mustangs, and Lincoln Navigators would, suddenly and without warning, downshifting from upper ratios to first gear, ultimately forcing the automaker to recall some 153,000 of the vehicles in the United States.

It now looks like it didn’t recall enough of them. Dangerous downshifts continue, and not just in vehicles covered by the recall. Another concern is that the problem is reappearing in supposedly “fixed” vehicles.

In a new investigation opened on December 25th, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has expanded the probe to include 1,375,577 F-150s, Expeditions, and Navigators from the 2011 to 2013 model years.

The NHTSA lists the danger of such a rapid change in gearing in its description of the earlier recall: “An unexpected downshift to 1st gear can cause the vehicle to slow down suddenly and without warning. This can also cause the rear tires to skid or lock up, increasing the risk of a crash.”

Since Ford issued its recall, a further 123 complaints have rolled into the agency, including “many reports” concerning vehicles not involved in the recall. More troubling is word that the recall seems to have been a dud. “[Some] reports indicate that the remedy was not effective,” the NHTSA states. Some owners report their vehicles dropping from top gear to first at 50 miles per hour, then switching back. In other cases, the lowest gear wasn’t reached, but it took the owner turning off the engine and restarting it before things returned to normal.

While an investigation doesn’t necessarily mean there’s another recall in the works, the number of complaints collected by the agency makes a new safety recall extremely likely. Of course, if Ford drags its feet (which aptly sums up the transmission’s symptoms), the NHTSA can compel it to call back the vehicles.

Two crashes are allegedly linked to the shifty 6R80 autoboxes, but no injuries were reported.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Jan 03, 2018

    An old friend and I years ago would go cruising in his red Chevy BelAire, straight 6 with a Powerglide. It would downshift to low on demand (when floored to engage the kick-down linkage) at speeds greater than 60mph. Great fun, lotsa noise when the rear wheels slowed and skidded with the shrieking sewing-machine-on-crack scream of that old stovebolt, and a thrill when the rear of the car spun around to the lead position on the newly built I-70. Never seemed to hurt it - he was still driving it around town three years later.

    • TR4 TR4 on Jan 03, 2018

      Yeah, but the PG did not really have a first gear; low was about 1.8:1. The Ford 6R80 has a first gear of around 4:1. This coupled with a modern locking torque converter means much greater possibility of over revving the engine.

  • EBFlex EBFlex on Jan 03, 2018

    The famous Alan Mulally cost cutting and low quality strikes again!!! Look at the bright side though, sure your vehicle doing this could lead to a serious crash, but at least Ford was making tons of money during that time.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next