The Price of Aveniring: Top-flight Buick LaCrosse Sees a Sticker Jump, But You've Already Stopped Reading This

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

We joke, but there’s many among us — even here at TTAC — who would love to see the full-size sedan segment return to its former glory. Ford can ditch this EcoSport idea and get back to building Galaxies and LTDs and Fairlanes, Dodge can reintroduce the Monaco and Polara, and Buick can slot the Electra 225 above its current LaCrosse.

Sadly, aficionados of the traditional passenger car, especially the largest class, are dwindling in the face of intense wooing from the crossover brigade. Once one discover what a high seating position and all-wheel drive can do for your life (and your confidence), one rarely goes back. Each year, fewer and fewer return for the LaCrosse.

It is against this backdrop that the division’s flagship sedan debuts its newly luxurious Avenir trim. As the second model to wear the name of Buick’s premium sub-brand, can the new trim lift the model’s falling fortunes?

The jury’s out on that, as it seems the Avenir trim is more about boosting profit from that shrinking volume. With a price tag of $45,795 after delivery, the LaCrosse Avenir retails for $3,700 more than the previous top-rung trim, the LaCrosse Premium. Adding all-wheel drive inflates the sticker to $47,995.

Starting price for a front-drive 2018 LaCrosse rings in at just over $30k.

Avenir, like GMC’s Denali, is all about appearance trappings and upgraded standard content. As such, the LaCrosse Avenir comes loaded to the gills, and then some. A trim-specific grille mimicking that of the Enclave Avenir, special badging and wheel choices, scripted sill plates, embroidered headrests, premium audio, and a panoramic sunroof come standard. (As the Avenir name is still early in its life, don’t expect much reaction when passengers see that sill plate.)

“Nine out of ten LaCrosse buyers are choosing one of the top two trim levels — customers are signaling they want more from Buick,” said Duncan Aldred, vice president of Global Buick and GMC, in describing the motivation to build an Avenir-spec LaCrosse.

Not to get too cynical, but with LaCrosse sales falling, bolstering the top of the range delivers more dollars to GM coffers before company brass delivers a decision on the model’s future. Already, rumors abound of a culling of slow-selling models. GM’s Hamtramck plant shut down for an extended period last fall to whittle down a bursting inventory. It’s a shame, as the LaCrosse, while definitely not a Millennial dream machine, is a capable and supremely comfortable vehicle with surprising fuel economy.

But the buying public has spoken. Those few that want a near-premium sedan want extra goodies, and those that don’t, well, they want trucks, crossovers, and SUVs. Buick LaCrosse sales fell 51 percent in December, with 2017 volume down some 26.9 percent.

The most decked-out LaCrosse at the dealership hits the market this spring.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 60 comments
  • CobraJet CobraJet on Jan 10, 2018

    I realize I am old and represent a tiny minority who likes to drive a sedan automobile. I am very fortunate to have a fleet of vehicles including a classic Mustang, a van, and two pickups, one being a fairly new crew cab Silverado. So I understand the advantages of riding in a high seating position with lots of utility. But for the daily commute and even longer trips, I really like my 2017 Lacrosse. It suits me just fine.

  • Teddyc73 Teddyc73 on Jan 10, 2018

    I didn't stop reading. What a dumb headline.

  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
  • Honda1 It really does not matter. The way bidenomics is going nobody will be able to afford shyt.
Next