Tesla's Feverish Production Drive Sometimes Means Partial Assembly at Stores: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Never has the air of breathless futurism surrounding Tesla taken such a hit. Following a revealing earning report and numerous reports of continuing production bottlenecks, this week wasn’t a good one for either Tesla shareholders or Model 3 reservation holders.

The electric automaker pushed back its 5,000-vehicle-per-week goal to the end of the first-quarter of 2018, rather than the end of this year. Its 10,000-vehicles-per-week goal remains a question mark. Tesla also announced a decrease in Model S and X production to bolster resources for Model 3 builds. In reporting a quarterly loss of $619 million, Tesla made it clear it’s burning through piles of cash in an attempt to smooth out production line hurdles.

Now, a new report sheds light on the frenetic activity occurring inside its Fremont, California factory. One of the claims certainly won’t soothe those worried about a long-standing Tesla concern: build quality.

In a report published by Britain’s Financial Times (subscription required), several people with knowledge of Tesla’s inner workings paint a picture of an all-hands-on-deck operation. The activity isn’t relegated to the company’s Fremont plant, either.

After visiting Fremont in recent weeks, two sources report seeing workers manually operating state-of-the-art automated Kuka robots purchased by Tesla to speed up assembly. Recent job postings point to Tesla’s need for robot programmers, long after Model 3 production actually kicked off.

“I have never seen so much manual labour on a line,” said a source with extensive plant inspection experience.

Other sources report after-the-fact design changes to certain components — something that jibes with a claim we heard recently. One person involved in the supply chain (of which Tesla CEO Elon Musk says there’s no problem) told FT that Tesla requested speedier production of a part, only to change the design once the supplier was in the midst of installing the necessary tooling.

“Tesla kept saying ‘you need to make it faster’,” the source said. “But any time you make changes [to the design], you go back to the start of the process.”

There’s no doubt that a quick and efficient assembly line, maybe even an industry-leading one, can emerge from the right amount of technology and expenditure. This is Tesla’s goal. However, it’s a better idea to have everything in place before production begins, especially on a vehicle viewed as a make-or-break product. Initial quality isn’t a minor thing, especially for a product that stands on a mountain of hype.

That brings us to the most glaring element of FT’s report — the claim, corroborated by a former regional executive, that Tesla ships unfinished some vehicles to Tesla stores for final assembly. Outside the confines of Fremont, seats, computer modules and media screens are installed via parts shipped to those locales, the sources claim.

“This goes back years,” said the unnamed executive. “It was common, common in every market — the seats, the displays were being flown in.”

Early examples of the Model S, and especially the Model X (plagued with door demons from the outset), led to quality concerns about Tesla products. It’s still common to see photos on social media of misaligned trim and doors. Such issues can’t occur on the mass-market Model 3, regardless of what brand diehards say on Reddit, as bad word of mouth and recalls can sink a company’s fortunes. Tesla’s already operating in the red — the Model 3 is meant to be its ticket to profitability.

The practice stems from some vehicles coming off the assembly line incomplete due to supply issues, two sources claim. By installing major components outside the factory, even via Tesla-certified personnel, the vehicles lose that quality control link to the assembly line.

During this week’s earnings call, Musk claimed the company is moving as fast as it can to build Model 3s. Certainly, this week’s revelations expose the danger of making share price-boosting promises that aren’t likely to fly in the real world. However, the FT report (and others) suggest the production process surrounding the car, as well as the vehicle itself (until recently, at least), is still an unbaked cake.

“Tesla can bring in the smartest people, but then if they are told to do what the boss wants it’s just wasted expertise,” a former Tesla senior director remarked.

[Images: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 43 comments
  • I_like_stuff I_like_stuff on Nov 03, 2017

    Meh, we'll add another $5 to the stock price. - Wall St, Today I know this sounds cliche, but Tesla isn't a car company. It's a status symbol company. The product can be a complete POS but people will buy it because driving one has status. And that's why the same rules that apply to Ford or GM don't apply to Tesla. It was kind of dumb for Musk to throw out that 250K number, but in the end if it's 250K or 25K won't matter. The sycophants will still be there, ready to hand him their money. See also Apple selling a $1200 iphone whose main selling point is a moving emoji.

    • See 4 previous
    • Lex Lex on Nov 06, 2017

      @APaGttH "ATP is already around $35K and $50K doesn’t get you a whole lot of vehicle anymore." I know is only one datapoint, but I just got a new 2017 CX-9 for under $35K+Tax and fees with very little haggling. Class 2 Autonomy (Radar Cruise control, automatic braking, Lane departure) a fabulous interior and most importantly seats 7. If automakers are charging 50K for mediocre cars, it's because the buyers are enabling them to pull this crap, IMHO

  • Conundrum Conundrum on Nov 03, 2017

    Gee, I thought from reading Fortune that this week Elon was down at the Gigafactory sorting out production problems on Model 3 battery packs. I imagine that Panasonic, who actually run the place because they know how to make things, are so happy that despite a severe head-cold, Musk took time out of his hectic schedule to give them the benefit of his otherwordly genius wherein he's the leading expert on everything. "Move that wiring lead over here Yamamoto, that'll clear it up!" quoth the genius after a solid two minutes of deep concentration. Let me see: battery build problems in Nevada, assembly line problems back in Fremont due to frequent brainstorms of a "better way to do it" which need to be implemented by next Tuesday 3 pm, upset workers who somehow don't share The Vision but just want to be paid an honest wage for an honest day's work, but unwilling to be slaves get fired via "performance reviews". The life of a Visionary who can't be bothered to build on the shoulders of existing production technology, and thus design and hire accordingly, but needs re-invent it at prototype level circa 1922, is hard. Then St Elon has to also juggle the expectations of the know-nothings on Wall Street, people with the engineering experience of Big Al from Oz, the man who informed us the Ford 2.7 V6 twin turbo was a dud, along with F150 aluminum beds. The world is full of people who just don't understand what they don't understand, but are more than willing to inform everyone else of their revelations. Some even impress sheeple. Meanwhile, perhaps Musk needs a course on delegation of responsibility. Nah, sorry, I forgot. That's old school and not like an overpriced iPhone 10 at all, not segment busting, well segment-busting if you believe the PR and don't mind standing in lineups at 3:30 am, so divorced from reality you do stupid things.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next