MKNothing: Why Lincoln Ditched the Alphabet Soup
The tens of readers who follow my bleatings here on TTAC (Hi, Dad!) may recall my fondness for the Lincoln brand. Having spent my own hard-earned Canadian dollars on two of them, plus encouraging other family members to do the same, I would be lying if I said I’m not rooting for the brand to once again plant its feet firmly in the minds of its target demographic.
For me, the disarmament campaign started when Lincoln began abandoning real names in favor of an alphanumeric (minus the numeric) naming scheme. Turns out, after reading a revealing Automotive News interview with Lincoln’s marketing chief, I’m not the only one who disliked it.
According to the report, Robert Parker, marketing honcho at Lincoln Motor Company, received validation for the decision to introduce the Nautilus nameplate well before its appearance at this year’s L.A. Auto Show.
In a fine bit of storytelling, Parker relates the tale of being on an airport shuttle ferrying passengers from a terminal to a parking lot. Seated near him was a husband and wife couple who were trying to tell the shuttle driver what kind of car they owned. You can probably guess where this tale is headed.
When asked what kind of car they owned, the couple got into a bit of a row. Why? They apparently owned a Lincoln, but couldn’t agree on what it was called. One insisted it was an MKC while the other was steadfast in their belief it was an MKZ. For Parker, this cemented the decision to abandon the MKWhatever nomenclature.
“It just really punctuated the challenge for me,” Parker said. “It was like, OK, it’s not just an internal discussion. This is real. People that don’t work and do this every day have a hard time with numbers and letters. We sometimes, as marketers, get a little too far over our skis.”
And there it is, folks. An admission from the top that the Lincoln three-letter system didn’t work. As a fan of the brand, I am very gratified to finally write those words.
The whole MK branding started in 2006 as an attempt to reference the brand’s past successes. Its first two letters were intended to be pronounced “Mark,” followed by the third consonant. This is why I always referred to ex-CEO Mark Fields as MKF.
Closing out the interview, Parker had one more gem to reveal, referencing Ford’s penchant for naming all cars with “F” monikers (Focus, Five Hundred, Fiesta, Fusion) while bestowing sport-utes with “E” labels (Explorer, Edge, Escape, Expedition, Excursion), and how that trend will not extend to Lincoln.
“That person’s retired,” Parker said, referring to a former executive. “We all loved him, but he was kind of stuck on E’s and F’s.”
I truly don’t think that exec was Alan Mulally, given that he wasted no time biffing the moronic and meaningless Five Hundred nameplate in favor of the Taurus badge. Throwing away all that name recognition, he argued, made no sense. He was correct.
Nor do I think that Mark Fields was the offender, because the time frames don’t quite align. No, I think the blame for all those E’s and F’s rests squarely at the feet of J Mays, designer extraordinaire who replaced Jack Telnack in ’97 and retired at the end of 2013.
Responsible for the ’05 Mustang, the GT, and the weirdo retro Thunderbird, Mays always seemed to be well liked in the industry and was certainly a skilled designer. He did, however, once command the designers at all of Ford’s marques to create car keys that reflected the “emotional qualities” of each brand. Fixating on alliteration wouldn’t be a bridge too far, methinks.
Anyways, I’m just glad Lincoln’s ditched the MK nonsense. Any wagers on what they’ll call the rest of their lineup? I’m jockeying for a return to Zephyr for the MKZ, Aviator for the MKC, and Quasimodo for the MKT.
[Image: Ford Motor Company]
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
- ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
- Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
- Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
- ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
It took too long, but finally! If you look at some of my TTAC comments from nearly a decade ago you will see me ranting about how stupid it was to give up names with heritage and emotion for a pseudo-European MK-blah code. The whole "Fords start with F..." nonsense was of that same era. Nasser was probably the worst CEO in modern Ford history, so let's blame him for it :).
I like the reintroduction of names with Lincoln, but the current scheme ceased to be a problem for me when I read a comment on this very site. MARK Zephyr (for the Fusion) MARK Truck (for the Flex Taurus based crossover) MARK Sedan (for the Taurus) MARK X (for the Edge based crossover) MARK LightTruck (for the short-lived Lincoln branded F-150) Then when the MKC joined the stable it wasn't too hard to put that in its place.