Genesis of a Dealer Dispute With Hyundai Motor America

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

You would think you’d be happy when a peer succeeds and goes on to greater things, but the reality is often a little grimier and less magnanimous. Genesis has been a sore subject around Hyundai Motor Company ever since the automaker spun it off into its own brand. However, this has less to do with its role as an elite nameplate and more about how to manage it as part of the greater whole.

Earlier this month, dealers expressed their dismay by walking out of a meeting with Hyundai Motor America’s executives — which included CEO Kenny Lee and COO Brian Smith. The incident didn’t last particularly long and the conference eventually got back on track, but it proves there’s unresolved issues as to how the Genesis brand should be handled.

According to Automotive News, dealers were upset at a proposal made by Hyundai that would see Genesis’ luxury vehicles sold at non-Hyundai retailers. Sources claimed they also weren’t particularly pleased with the amount the company planned to compensate stores that would no longer be eligible to host the upmarket brand.

Dealers exited the meeting suddenly to talk amongst themselves. Currently, stores have to undergo an approvals process to sell certain Genesis products. But Hyundai wants to create standalone retailers over the next few years to increase overall volume for the brand. It now appears concerned that the existing dealer network won’t be sufficient — especially if Genesis is going to maintain a prestigious image.

“One of the best things about this closed process is the candid approach taken by the dealers and company personnel allowing us to speak openly and freely and reach mutually agreed upon decisions,” Hyundai of America said in a statement to Automotive News. “At this particular meeting, during a conversation on the Genesis brand, the dealers asked to have further discussions on the topic, which already are taking place.”

At present, around 352 Hyundai stores are eligible to sell the Genesis G90. Ideally, Hyundai would limit the luxury sedan to a smaller number of exceptionally nice retailers with Genesis-specific showrooms in regions where the vehicle is most likely to sell. The company announced its goals in August but hasn’t yet come up with a plan that appeases its existing retail network. It hopes to have something everyone can agree on by April.

“The company’s intent has always been that Genesis vehicles will be sold exclusively through a distinct Genesis dealer body that is profitable for dealers and will deliver the luxury experience Genesis buyers expect,” Hyundai said. “Both the company and the dealers are in complete agreement that this is critical for the success of the Genesis brand and the dealer body.”

[Image: Hyundai]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Jthorner Jthorner on Dec 01, 2017

    A few year old off-lease low mileage Genesis is a screaming bargain. That said, Genesis can never compete with the real luxury makes unless it has dedicated high-end dealerships. But the question is: Will Genesis ever do the kind of volume and attract the kind of big spending customer that Lexus, MBZ and BMW do? Personally I doubt it. Look how much trouble Acura, Cadillac and Lincoln are having trying to compete.

  • Mrmk1 Mrmk1 on Feb 25, 2018

    Most of you are on point. I recently decided to move up (relative term) from a ‘15 Genesis to the new ~$72k G90. Despite the new Genesis dealer within a dealer concept... this time the buying experience was much worse than when the Genesis was Hyundai. The process took almost a month due to internal haggling on the lease terms between the dealer and Hyundai/Genesis. I had to physically go into the dealership everytime they needed to change a number. The whole thing was a complete cluster. With Genesis, don’t listen to any of the grandiose hype about a “luxury brand or a luxury experience” from company executives or the (paid) automotive press. Just go in and negotiate as if you are trying to get a deal on a $15k Hyundai Accent... because that’s how it is going to go down. If you are willing to put up with a little bs, you can get a comfortable and reliable product at a very good price. Luxury is nonexistent because you get what you pay for...

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next