Your Next Mail Truck? NHTSA Document Previews Mahindra USPS Vehicle Prototype

Bozi Tatarevic
by Bozi Tatarevic

The United States Postal Service put out a call for bids for a new delivery vehicle to replace its aging Grumman LLV a couple of years ago. We haven’t heard much about the process since then, other than the fact that the USPS secured funding and selected five finalists.

We recently uncovered a NHTSA filing submitted by Mahindra Automotive North America that may give us a better idea of what we can expect for the future mail truck.

Mahindra filed VIN documentation for 10 configurations of their version of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle in May of this year. The document shows two-wheel drive, four-wheel drive, gasoline and mild hybrid versions as required by the USPS bid.

Based on the listing of a chassis of 3,200 millimeters contained in the document, it’s likely Mahindra is basing the frame on its Genio midsize truck, which has that exact same wheelbase. The Genio starts at the equivalent of $15,000 USD in many of the markets where it is available, so it could be an easy way for the Indian automaker to offer a competitive price.

However, Mahindra is not using its own engine. The company is following in the tradition of the LLV by using a Chevrolet truck engine that is a few years old. In this case, it selected the General Motors 2.5-liter direct-injected four-cylinder found in the Colorado pickup, along with a few GM sedans. This option was chosen likely because of the available eAssist mild-hybrid system used in cars like the 2018 Buick LaCrosse.

The mild-hybrid option meets the specs of the USPS request but it does not offer significant fuel economy gains due to it being a bolt-on system with a belt-powered generator. An earlier generation of this system is found in my wife’s Saturn Vue Hybrid and, based on my observations, provides a 1 or 2 mpg improvement at best.

The other important detail in the document is that Mahindra is adding a front airbag for the driver, along with a Type 2 seat belt — which will be a significant safety improvement over the LLV. This document gives us a nice preview of what the next USPS vehicle may look like. We look forward to sharing the other four candidates as information becomes available.

[Images: General Motors, NHTSA, Genio/ Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

Bozi Tatarevic
Bozi Tatarevic

More by Bozi Tatarevic

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 47 comments
  • Ryanwm80 Ryanwm80 on Oct 10, 2017

    You would think that, given the postal services finances, they would understand the importance of supporting American workers.

  • YouDontKnowMe YouDontKnowMe on Oct 26, 2017

    At least the prototype vehicles are being built in the US

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next