2018 Honda Fit LX Review - What If It's the Only Subcompact for You?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
2018 honda fit lx review what if it s the only subcompact for you

Subcompacts, if they ever were in favor, have quickly fallen out of favor in the United States. In 2017, sales in the first three-quarters of the year plunged by more than a fifth, year-over-year. The Honda Fit, modestly updated for the 2018 model year, is on track in 2017 to fall to a five-year low of around 50,000 sales, a far cry from the nearly 80,000 American Honda sold a decade ago.

The Honda Fit, not now in third-gen form nor in any prior iteration, has never sold on the strength of style. There have always been less expensive subcompacts, faster subcompacts, and better-equipped subcompacts, as well.

There have not, however, at least not during the Fit’s tenure, been any subcompacts that offer the flexibility of the Honda Fit. But does the fact that the 2018 Honda Fit is likely the only current subcompact that could operate as my family’s lone vehicle make up for the fact that the Fit lags behind rivals in key areas?

Now entering the fourth model year of its third generation, the 2018 Honda Fit benefits from extensive availability of the Honda Sensing suite of safety gear (lane keeping assist and adaptive cruise, for example), retuned suspension, an acoustic glass windshield, and more sound insulation.

But in essence, this is the same vehicle for 2018 that it was for 2017. That means the driver’s seat doesn’t slide back quite as far as it ought to. Thigh support is nearly nonexistent, and what little soft foam support there is remains of insufficient quality. Wind noise at the A and B-pillars is excessive. Hooked up to a continuously variable transmission, the 130-horsepower 1.5-liter isn’t a particularly happy revver. Lacking the smoothness expected of a Honda four-cylinder, the 1.5 protests with a harshness that diminishes the driver’s desire to accelerate. Riding on the Fit LX’s 185/60R15 rubber, there’s not enough grip for the Fit to feel sporty, and the third-gen model doesn’t provide enough feel and interactivity to foment fun.

And yet the 2018 Honda Fit is at its core a veritable minivan, in the true sense of the word mini. Slap a pair of sliding doors on this 161-inch-long monobox and you’re about as set for the frugal school run as is possible.

Honda says there are 39.3 inches of rear legroom in the Fit and 96 cubic feet of passenger volume overall. That’s more legroom than you’ll get in the back of a Honda Civic sedan and more passenger volume than you’ll find in a Volkswagen Jetta, two cars that stretch much farther than the Fit on much lengthier wheelbases. Throw another 17 cubic feet of cargo capacity behind the rear seat and the Fit becomes an inordinately spacious subcompact car. And that’s before you introduce the adaptability of the Fit’s second-row Magic Seats, which can essentially introduce a second cargo area when you’re travelling with three passengers aboard.

But is versatility the answer if Honda demands a Fit premium? After all, Nissan Versa sedans sticker from as little as $12,875 with enough rear legroom for NBA forwards. The new Kia Rio is distinctly more refined than the Honda Fit and starts below $15,000. The Toyota Yaris iA, essentially a Mazda 2 in sedan clothes, starts below $17,000 with the fun driving mannerisms once linked to the Honda Fit.

Yes, versatility may be the answer. Yes, versatility may be such a valuable extra in an otherwise capable (if not outstanding) car because in the case of a family of four with a large dog, for example, no other car in this class can cope with our needs.

That’s always been the Fit’s claim to fame. Even if it isn’t the most attractive, the quickest, or the most affordable, or the most handsomely equipped subcompact, the Fit does what I need it to do.

Despite the newfound installation of extensive safety gear at the low end of the lineup, however, a higher grade would be tempting, largely because the 2018 Honda Fit LX appears far more poverty-spec than it actually is. Replacing these covered wheels with alloys, swapping the CVT for a six-speed manual, installing the 2018 Fit EX’s fog lights, and gaining a sunroof won’t turn the Fit into a beauty, but it will extinguish the one-lakh-car look of the Fit LX.

At $19,035, just $170 more than this $18,865 tester, the basic 2018 Honda Fit EX may well be the n0-brainer in the Fit range.

[Images: © 2017 Timothy Cain]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Oct 22, 2017

    If what you want is a quieter, faster, more refined Honda Fit...buy a Chevy Bolt EV. Twice the money up front, but you make up a chunk of that with tax credits/rebates, and another chunk by never paying for gas or routine maintenance. No?

  • CKNSLS Sierra SLT CKNSLS Sierra SLT on Oct 22, 2017

    Devilsrotary-rent a Ford Fusion, Sonata, or even a Chevy Malibu for your next road trip and come back on here and let us know how it compares to you "excellent road trip" in the Fit.

  • 285exp If the conversion to EVs was really so vital to solve an existential climate change crisis, it wouldn’t matter whether they were built by US union workers or where the batteries and battery materials came from.
  • El scotto Another EBPosky, "EVs are Stoopid, prove to me water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius" article.It was never explained if the rural schools own the buses or if the school bus routes are contracted out. If the bus routes are contracted out, will Carpenter or Bluebird offer an electric school bus? Flexmatt never stated the range of brand-unspecified school bus. Will the min-mart be open at the end of the 179-mile drive? No cell coverage? Why doesn't the bus driver have an emergency sat phone?Two more problems Mr. Musk could solve.
  • RICK Long time Cadillac admirer with 89 Fleetwood Brougham deElegance and 93 Brougham, always liked Eldorado until downsized after 76. Those were the days. Sad to see what now wears Cadillac name.
  • Carsofchaos Bike lanes are in use what maybe 10 to 12 hours a day? The other periods of the day they aren't in use whatsoever. A bike can carry one person and a vehicle can carry multiple people. It's very simple math to figure out that a bike lane in no way shape or form will handle more people than cars will.The bigger issue is double parked delivery vehicles. They are often double parked and taking up lanes because there are cars parked on the curb. You combine that with a bike lane and pedestrians Crossing wherever they feel like it and it's a recipe for disaster. I think if we could just go back to two lanes of traffic things would flow much better. I started coming to the city in 2003 before a lot of these bike lanes were implemented and the traffic is definitely much worse now than it was back then. Sadly at this point I don't really think there is a solution but I can guarantee that congestion pricing will not fix this problem.
  • Charles When I lived in Los Angeles I saw a 9-5 a few times and instanly admired the sweeping low slug aerodynamic jet tech influenced lines and all that beautiful glass. The car was very different from what I expected from a Saab even though the 900 Turbo was nice. A casual lady friend had a Saab Sonnet, never drove or rode in it but nonetheless chilled my enthusiasm and I eventually forgot about Saabs. In the following years I have had seven Mercedes's, three or four Jaguars even two Daimlers both the 250 V-8 and the massive and powerful Majestic Major. Daily drivers of a brand new 300ZX 2+2 and Lincolns, plus a few diesel trucks. Having moved to my big farm in central New York, trucks and SUV's are the standard, even though I have a Mercedes S500 in one of my barns. Due to circumstances with my Ford Explorer and needing a second driver I found the 2006 9-5 locally. Very little surface rust, none undercarriage, original owner, garage kept, wife driver and all the original literature and a ton of paid receipts and history. The car just turned 200,000 miles and I love it. Feels new like I'm back in my Nissan 300ZX with a lot more European class and ready power with the awesome turbo. So fun to drive, the smooth power and torque is incredible! Great price paid to justify going through the car and giving her everything she needs, i.e., new tires, battery, all shocks, struts, control arms, timing chain and rust removable to come, plus more. The problem now is I want to restore it and likely put it in my concrete barn and only drive in good weather. As to the writer, Alex Dykes, I take great exception calling the 9-5 Saab "ugly," finding myself looking back at her beauty and uniqueness. Moreover, I get new looks from others not quite recognizing, like the days out west with my more expensive European cars. There are Saabs eclipsing 300K rourinely and one at a million miles and I believe one car with 500K on the original engine. So clearly, this is a keeper, in love already with my SportCombi. I want to be in that elite club.