2018 Ford Expedition Pricing Revealed; Base Model Pushes Well Above 50 Big Ones

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You’ll have to shell out a fair bit of extra cash to get into a 2018 Ford Expedition, as the completely redesigned full-size SUV now carries an entry price above the $50,000 marker. Ford has to pay for that aluminum body, you know.

Of course, buyers aren’t just receiving a lighter body and long-overdue styling update. More standard features and considerably more power comes as part of the package, as well as the return of an off-road package that disappeared as an option years ago. As buyers move up the trim scale, they’ll soon discover the price gap between 2017 and 2018 Expedition models only grows larger.

Ford’s 2018 Expedition pricing structure, revealed by CarsDirect and confirmed by a company spokesman, starts at $52,890 after destination. That’s $4,570 higher than last year’s XLT model. Should you want more room between the liftgate and rear seat, an Expedition MAX, which replaces the long-wheelbase EL model, carries a sticker of $55,580. The longer XLT Expedition sees a $4,550 price bump over the 2017 version.

Should all-wheel drive be a necessity, tack on roughly $3,000 to either price. While 2018 pricing for the Expedition’s chief rival, the Chevrolet Suburban, remains unknown, the base 2017 LS version of that long-wheelbase, full-size SUV retails for $51,210 after destination. The two Detroit rivals share the same ballpark, though the Suburban now appears the value leader — especially in higher trims.

New for 2018 is an off-road-focused FX4 model that uses an XLT 4×4 model as its launching point. In order to get those skid plates, upgraded shocks, an electronic limited-slip rear differential and off-road tires, you’ll first have to add the 202A equipment package to the XLT 4×4, then add the FX4 package. All told, the most rugged of Expeditions costs $63,155.

What will an Expedition Limited set you back? In standard wheelbase guise, buyers of the 2018 model will pay $6,540 more for the Limited, which retails for $63,780, compared to last year. For MAX models, the price gap grows an extra $135. Keep in mind that lower trims all gain a 10-speed automatic and a newly upgraded 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 good for 375 hp and 470 lb-ft of torque.

Platinum buyers — the crowd that wants it all — stand to see the largest increase. They’ll also see more power from the EcoBoost V6, to the tune of 400 hp and 480 lb-ft. For top-spec Expeditions, 2018 prices push the trim to $73,905 after destination, an increase of $8,505. Long-wheelbase lovers can expect to pay $76,595 for an Expedition Platinum MAX, or $8,540 more than last year. Sitting at the top of the price heap is the Expedition Platinum MAX 4×4 which, after destination, demands the handing over of $79,740. That’s $8,650 more than 2017.

It’s at this upper range where the Ford and GM rivals diverge. While the top-flight Expedition nearly touches $80,000, Chevrolet’s most luxury-laden Suburban doesn’t quite reach the $70,000 barrier. In fact, a loaded Expedition will cost you more than a de-optioned 2017 Cadillac Escalade in either wheelbase length.

Decision time awaits.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 73 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Jun 23, 2017

    Wow, classy styling... the new Ford Extinction looks expensive! Oh...that's because it is.

  • DownUnder2014 DownUnder2014 on Jul 04, 2017

    I know it is probably just me, but the Expedition styling seems to have some resemblances to the GM twins...

    • Phreshone Phreshone on Jul 04, 2017

      there's only so much you can do with 2 boxes and still have somewhat efficient interior packaging

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next