Let's Try This Again: Fiat Chrysler Attempts to Certify 2017 Diesel Rams and Jeeps, Avoid Fines

by Steph Willems

Published: May 19th, 2017

let s try this again fiat chrysler attempts to certify 2017 diesel rams and jeeps

After being forbidden from selling 2017 Ram 1500 and Jeep Grand Cherokee models equipped with the 3.0-liter diesel V6, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles is hoping for a little love from the Environmental Protection Agency.

The EPA suspended the certification process in January after discovering eight undeclared auxiliary emissions control devices on the EcoDiesel models. The existence of the software, installed in those vehicles since the 2014 model year, earned FCA a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act. Since then, the automaker has attempted to work with environmental regulators to smooth over the controversy, even as its mailbox filled with subpoenas from federal and state authorities.

Yesterday, we learned the Justice Department was readying a lawsuit against FCA. With the potential for billions of dollars in fines staring it in the face, FCA has whipped up a new application in the hopes of placating the EPA and selling some light-duty diesels.

This morning, the automaker announced it had filed an application for diesel vehicle emissions certification with the EPA and California Air Resources Board for the Ram and Jeep models. This time around, the models come equipped with “updated emissions software calibrations.”

In a release, FCA stated:

The filing is the result of many months of close collaboration between FCA US and EPA and CARB, including extensive testing of the vehicles, to clarify issues related to the Company’s emissions control technology. With the permission of EPA and CARB, FCA US intends to install the same modified emissions software in 2014-2016 MY Jeep Grand Cherokee and Ram 1500 diesel vehicles. FCA US believes this will address the agencies’ concerns regarding the emissions software calibrations in those vehicles.

FCA US also believes that these actions should help facilitate a prompt resolution to ongoing discussions with the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and other governmental agencies.

As part of its attempt to appease regulators, FCA claims it will make the software updates available to owners of 2014-2016 Ram and Jeep Grand Cherokee EcoDiesel owners through their dealership. The automaker says it doesn’t expect “any impact on performance or fuel efficiency.”

FCA denied it was attempting to pull a fast one on the EPA, with CEO Sergio Marchionne saying at the time, “We’re not trying to break the bloody law.” The maximum fine FCA could face for each of the 104,000 affected vehicles stands at $44,539 — a $4.6 billion price tag.

There has so far been no response from the EPA, meaning it could be a tense weekend in Auburn Hills.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#Diesel #EcoDiesel #Emissions #EPA #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #Jeep #LawAndOrder #Ram

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 15 comments

Klossfam on May 19, 2017

I had my 2015 RAM 1500 EcoD for 18 months and had 3 software reflashes just in that period of time...So EcoDiesel owners will not be intimidated by additional software updates...It was 32,000 trouble free miles for the most part...the updates were mainly to fix things like overly sensitive EGR valve warnings and similar false check engine warnings. I have a 2017 Ridgeline now but it sucks that the EPA had/has to torture FCA about this power plant...

Like Reply
No Nickname Required on May 19, 2017

Those FCA engineers must have been working around the clock for the past 24 hours to complete that "extensive testing". Seriously though, I fail to see why FCA has been dragging their feet about this whole issue. It seems to me that if they are telling the truth they have nothing to hide. Just disclose what the software is and what it does and let the EPA see for themselves.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Mopar4wd on May 19, 2017
  
  From what I understand they have released to EPA the issue seems to be they did not file the proper paperwork disclosing the programing earlier. I have not heard if the EPA would have allowed it had they filed the paperwork, which seems to be FCAs contention. It seems what the software does is in a grey area where the EPA may have allowed it had it been disclosed.
  
  Like
- Flipper35 on May 22, 2017
  
  @mopar4wd That was my understanding as well. The undisclosed controls are what got them into trouble. The EPA thinks they may or may not be a defeat device but don't know since the paperwork was not filed for the controls.
  
  Like
- No Nickname Required on May 22, 2017
  
  Thanks for the clarification guys. It makes more sense now.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”