Junkyard Find: 1980 Buick Skylark Limited

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

We saw a Cadillac and an Oldsmobile as our last two Junkyard Finds, so how about another member of the General Motors family? Yes, it’s a rare example of the Buick sibling to the Chevrolet Citation, the first of the front-wheel-drive Skylarks.

The Skylark name had already endured the 1975 through 1979 model years on Buick-badged Chevy Novas, but that humiliation was nothing next to the misery of the Iron Duke engine. The worst car I have ever experienced was the Pontiac version of this car, so I admit having some anti-X-Body/Iron Duke bias.

They spell it this way over there in England, so Detroit switched to the “litre” spelling on its displacement badges during this era. Those 2.5 litres produced 84 horsepower in the ’80 Skylark’s Iron Duke, by the way.

Inside, much blue and purple Nearly Velour™ fabric, much aggressively fake wood, and many LIMITED badges.

The MSRP on a new 1980 Skylark Limited sedan was $5,306, or around $16,500 in 2017 dollars. A Duked Citation sedan was just $5,153, the Oldsmobile Omega version was $5,266, and the Pontiac Phoenix listed at $5,251. Fortunately, the rear-wheel-drive Nova-based Skylark was available through the 1988 model year … in Iran.

This car managed to outlive 95 percent of the Hondas and Toyotas sold for the 1980 model year, so there’s that.

“They made their efficient smaller cars luxurious, and their luxurious larger cars efficient!”

“Skylark also gets a lot of votes for its stand on the economy.”







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • Bobmaxed Bobmaxed on May 11, 2017

    Limited: "restricted in size, amount, or extent; few, small, or short" To me a car that brags that it is limited has never made any sense.

  • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on May 24, 2017

    This is one of the very first rental cars I remember riding in. My Dad was working out of town and we went to visit him. It was certainly an Skylark in this color. These cars were everywhere in Pittsburgh, all X bodies were, and then suddenly they weren't. But every once in awhile, you'll see one that has survived.

  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
  • Namesakeone I think it's the age old conundrum: Every company (or industry) wants every other one to pay its workers well; well-paid workers make great customers. But nobody wants to pay their own workers well; that would eat into profits. So instead of what Henry Ford (the first) did over a century ago, we will have a lot of companies copying Nike in the 1980s: third-world employees (with a few highly-paid celebrity athlete endorsers) selling overpriced products to upper-middle-class Americans (with a few urban street youths willing to literally kill for that product), until there are no more upper-middle-class Americans left.
  • ToolGuy I was challenged by Tim's incisive opinion, but thankfully Jeff's multiple vanilla truisms have set me straight. Or something. 😉
  • ChristianWimmer The body kit modifications ruined it for me.
  • ToolGuy "I have my stance -- I won't prejudice the commentariat by sharing it."• Like Tim, I have my opinion and it is perfect and above reproach (as long as I keep it to myself). I would hate to share it with the world and risk having someone critique it. LOL.
Next