Speed King: Ferrari's 812 Superfast Is, Well, You Know…

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Vehicle names are often lies. Take LTD, for example. Demon? No proof of possession, at least none that can be recognized by the Catholic Church.

Ferrari, on the other hand, has introduced a new Geneva-bound model that aptly sums up its purpose through its name: Superfast. Yes, the Ferrarri 812 Superfast is, unsurprisingly, just that.

As a successor to the F12 Berlinetta, the 812 Superfast needs to do things in a gutsier manner than the model that came before. It’s also the 70th anniversary of the first Ferrari-badged car, so it only made sense for the prancing pony to make this model its fastest and most powerful production offering to date.

Avoiding any form of forced induction, the 812 Superfast’s 5.5-liter V12 makes 790 horsepower and 530 lb-ft of torque. Yes, it’s a screamer, making peak power at a lofty 8,500 rpm. Maximum torque arrives at 7,000 rpm, though a driver can still capture 80 percent of that figure at engine speeds half that.

What is all of this caged energy good for? According to Ferrari, zero to 62 miles per hour should fly by in 2.9 seconds, with a top speed of somewhere above 211 mph as a target should anyone want to pursue it.

Weight distribution on this front-engined ride, which weighs less than 2,400 pounds when dry, falls 53 percent to the rear, 47 percent up front. A seven-speed dual-clutch transmission sends power to the rear wheels. Electric power steering makes its brand debut, and Ferrari promises an updated version of Slide Slip Control to preserve the Superfast after the happy customer peels out of the lot.

Price? There is no price, at least not yet. Ferrari will have all the details on this ultra-lux performer at its official unveiling next month at the Geneva Motor Show.

As for the name, not only is is applicable — it’s also historical. The moniker originated on a version of the 410 Superamerica that appeared in 1956. Later, the 1964-1966 500 Superfast carried the name to prominence.

[Images: Ferrari]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • Philadlj Philadlj on Feb 17, 2017

    I dunno, it looks like it was sculpted by cold, expensive computers rather than warm human hands like the Ferraris of yore. (probably because it was).

  • NeilM NeilM on Feb 18, 2017

    Now that we're well over 50 years into the era of the mid-engine supercar — I count from the 1966 Lamborghini Miura — I'm finding it hard to warm up to the proportions of these cab backward designs. Ferrari, with its need to accommodate the length of a V12 engine, has a bit more excuse than Corvette with its short V8, but even so the front seems too long and the rear overhang oddly short. Pretty sure I wouldn't kick an 812 out of bed though...

    • Markogts Markogts on Feb 18, 2017

      Well, it's necessary for weight distribution. Put the engine forward, but not too much :-)

  • Tim Myers Can you tell me why in the world Mazda uses the ugliest colors on the MX5? I have a 2017 in Red and besides Black or White, the other colors are horrible for a sports car. I constantly hear this complaint. I wish someone would tell whoever makes theses decisions that they need a more sports car colors available. They’d probably sell a lot more of them. Just saying.
  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
Next