QOTD: A Total Son Of The Eclipse?

by Jack Baruth

Published: February 17th, 2017

Five and a half years ago, I took a rented Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder on an impromptu tour of Los Angeles with one of the coolest girls I ever dated. But not even my extreme sentimentality regarding the lady in question and the nights we spent together could make me overlook the nontrivial flaws that utterly spoiled the final-generation descendant of the original Disposable Speed Machine.

It was not a good car, to put it mildly.

Yet if I’d known that the Eclipse name would one day be attached to YAFC (Yet Another Fucking Crossover) I imagine that I would have cherished that poky little droptop just a bit more than I did. This is particularly true considering the fact that the original Eclipse was a genuinely thrilling and important automobile. It was a turbocharged all-wheel-drive sports coupe with big power, wicked handling, a sleek shape, and a sensible price tag — and it hit the dealerships back when most family sedans had 130 horses and beam rear axles. I’d like to respect that, for just a moment. I’d like to remind everybody that the Eclipse was once something special.

Which leads us to today’s question(s):

Question Zero: Is there anything on the market that, in your opinion, adequately expresses the spirit of the original 1989 Eclipse? What can you buy today that offers just as much excitement at a similar, inflation-adjusted, price point?

Question One: Is there anything that Mitsubishi could do in the way of features, packaging, pricing, or performance that would make you care at all about this latest cynical crossover? What if it offered 400 horsepower for $29,999 or got 50 mpg in the city or matched a Tahoe’s cargo capacity?

I have my own thoughts on these questions, but to be honest, looking at my old Eclipse review was the proverbial taste of madeline that sent me into a reverie about that trip to Los Angeles. Those Hollywood nights! And those Hollywood hills! I was a Midwestern boy on my own!

[Image: Wikimedia Commons ( CC BY-SA 3.0)]

#EagleTalon #EclipseReplacement #Mitsubishi #MitsubishiEclipse #QOTS #QuestionOfTheDay

Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 106 comments

Quasimondo on Feb 19, 2017

Answer to Question Zero: The Ford Focus RS is the only vehicle that comes to mind. Like the Eclipse, it is wickedly and unexpectedly fast for a car that doesn't have the prestige to deserve such unbelievable performance. Answer to Question 1: It's a crossover, so nothing will make me care about it. The last chance Mitsubishi had at truly reviving this name was when they released the beautiful fourth generation in 2006. Unfortunately, instead of giving us something that could've morphed into the spiritual successor to the 3000GT VR-4, Mitsubishi botched it and gave us a heavy and unbalanced pig. Bonus trivia: The Eclipse pictured in the article is was a version built for the European market. The breakaway mirrors are a giveaway. Unfortunately for those across the pond, European market Eclipses had neither the All-Wheel-Drive, or the turbocharger, and were stuck with the non-turbo 4G63 engine.

Like Reply
Mountainman on Feb 20, 2017

I loved the first generation Eclipse. Looked like a shoe. Poor Mitsubishi..... Oh how you've lost your way.... My Colt had a leaky sunroof.... And my Super Shift died the next day.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.