Ace of Base: Detroit's Half-Ton Work Trucks

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Earlier this morning, Jack regaled us with a tale of a young man buying himself a loaded regular-cab F-150. Such a beast still exists, often selling at the rate of glacier progression and celebrating birthdays as they loiter on dealer lots. At the other end of the spectrum, rear-drive regular cab base models – with an 8-foot box, natch – ply the roads and work for a living.

How do entry-level trucks from the Detroit Three stack up when compared to each other? Ace of Base breaks them down in alphabetical order with the caveat that, based on price and feature content, there is a clear winner.

First up: the 2017 Chevy Silverado 1500 WT. Absent of any options, its Monroney shows a price of $27,975. For this sum, buyers will net themselves vinyl floors and a vinyl bench, bringing back childhood memories of peeling sticky legs off the seat during hot summer drives. At least its standard air conditioning will cool down the cab a bit. Manual windows and mirrors are expected at this instant ramen price, but USB and AUX ports for the audio system mean drivers are not limited to staticky terrestrial radio. Its 4.3-liter V6 puts out 285 horsepower with direct injection. Power locks and cruise control are good additions to the base model feature list.

Next, the 2017 Ford F-150 XL. The Blue Oval sees fit to grant truck shoppers with the choice of vinyl or no-charge cloth bench seating, a sorely under-appreciated option. Some will argue cloth simply soaks up coffee spills and gear-oil stains from the coveralls of its hardworking drivers. I say simply accept the inevitable damage and spring for a secondhand bench to replace the trashed unit at trade time. Air conditioning is along for the ride, as are a tilt wheel and the ability to haul about 5000 pounds. Suggested price? $27,030. Keep in mind, Ford has already shown its 2018 model with a different face and new 3.3-liter V6 base engine. This means dealers are probably more than willing to cut a deal and clear out the suddenly old-hat 2017s.

Finally, we find the 2017 Ram 1500 Tradesman, the oldest design of the lot. Like the Chevy, Ram forces cheapskate buyers to endure a vinyl bench, but the interior is with air conditioning and USB/AUX audio ports. Cruise control appears thanks to the magic of economies-of-scale, as it’s no doubt cheaper for Ram to fit a tilt/cruise equipped wheel than to engineer a tilt-only unit for lower trims. The Ram is rated about 150-pounds less than the Ford in terms of towing prowess. But here’s the kicker, though: Ram includes a Class IV hitch and a 7-pin trailer wiring connection at its $26,395 base price.

This makes Ram the winner in the Ace of Base measure … and I’m not just saying that because there’s a much-loved seven-year old Quad Cab Sport sitting in my driveway. With the exception of a vile vinyl bench seat, Ram’s inclusion of a hitch and 7-pin connector right from the factory at the lowest MSRP is an appealing feature combination.

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The models above is shown in American dollars absent of destination charges and incentives. As always, your dealer may sell for less, especially on a base model truck.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 97 comments
  • Zackman Zackman on Jan 27, 2017

    I wouldn't buy a Chrysler-anything on a bet, at any price. For me, it would be a hard choice between Ford and Chevy. My B-i-L has a GMC standard cab, long bed work truck he bought a few years ago, and it is great. It's comfortable, even with me sitting in the middle with 3 of us in the cab. If I were ever in the market for a truck, I would want an extended cab, short bed model, one step up from basic W/T trim (or lack of it), meaning: Dump those ugly, all-black grilles! I would cheerfully accept the chrome surround on the Silverado, if that's the new face, though. I'd have to lean toward the Chevy because I'm a Chevy guy at heart, but I would definitely check out and compare Ford vs. Chevy.

  • Koreancowboy Koreancowboy on Jan 27, 2017

    Every truck that I've ever owned was equipped this way, so I'd be inclined to buy another one like that Tradesman (but in red).

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next