Mercedes Cranks the Wick on AMG SL to 1,047 Lb-ft

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Be honest. When one thinks of vehicles with four-figure levels of torque, heavy-duty pickup trucks tend to spring immediately to mind. But now we can add a Mercedes-Benz to that roster - and it comes from the most unlikely of segments. 


Enter the *inhales* 2024 Mercedes-AMG SL 63 S E PERFORMANCE *exhales*. Someone in Stuttgart must have a brother who owns a letter making business in need of a boost. At any rate, this ragtop is apparently good for 805 horsepower and a staggering 1,047 lb-ft torque peak, courtesy of a V8 engine and hybrid gubbins. 


We find a 4.0-liter biturbo octopot under that swollen bonnet, appended by an electric drive unit on the rear axle contributing 201 hp to the equation. That motor dances with a two-speed transmission whilst the V8 deals with a nine-speed that’s been fettled by AMG. Note well: there remains a mechanical connection of the AMG Performance 4MATIC+ all-wheel drive system, meaning the electro guts can shuffle power to the front wheels under certain conditions. There’s a 6.1kWh battery in the mix, as well. Tech is wonderful. 

How wonderful? How about 0 - 60 mph in just 2.8 seconds type of wonderful? Top speed is electronically limited to 196 mph and speeds are brought back to sanity by six-piston calipers up front with 16.5-inch carbon ceramic discs. 


It’s worth saying that while the four-figure torque gets all the headlines, there is a notation that “system torque” ranges from 797 lb-ft up to the stated maximum. That, of course, is still nothing at which to sneeze. There are all manner of driving modes, of course, including an all-electric though Merc has yet to say how far this thing will get on electrons alone thought they do make the effort to point out the battery is designed for fast power delivery and draw rather than longest possible range. Good enough for tootling around Rodeo Drive, at least. And yes, that is a charging port on its rump.

Having driven the SL 63 in California when it showed up on the market about two years ago, this author can confidently say the thing is not wanting for a bit of power. Jacking twist to 1,047 lb-ft is sure to turn the brute in a suit into an even more fearsome weapon in which to terrorize sun-soaked coastal roads or wherever the nation’s 1% choose to live these days. The presence of active ride control and rear-axle steering should also help Hollywood elites from wadding this thing up on the streets of Malibu too quickly.


Merc says the 2024 Mercedes-AMG SL 63 S E PERFORMANCE will appear at American dealerships in the upcoming calendar year.


[Image: Mercedes-Benz]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 19 comments
  • Abraham Abraham on Dec 13, 2023

    Grotesque from every angle.

    • RHD RHD on Dec 18, 2023

      Agree. It's a performance monster, and a convertible to boot. It's a shame that it looks terrible. Whatever happened to the class that MB used to exude? It has diminished steadily over the decades, and now is in negative territory.



  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 13, 2023

    If you are interested in one of these, ToolGuy recommends the lease. 😉

    • See 2 previous
    • RHD RHD on Dec 18, 2023

      No worries... your bicycle back in high school had two transmissions.


  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next