QOTD: Is the Encore the Worst Buick Ever?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
Electra. Wildcat. Grand National. Riviera. Buick has some storied names in its history. Unfortunately, as we wind down 2016, all of those nice names remain long gone, never to return.In their place, throughout the decades, there have been some awful sedans, a truck-based item, even a minivan. We’ve also got some tasty crossovers which may or may not be propping up Opel’s failing product line across the ocean, and also appealing to and/or made in China.So, let’s decide if the Encore is actually the worst offering Buick ever unleashed, all things considered. Shall we?
Our first awful nominee is the Skylark of the early 1980s. Sister of the Citation, this little Malaise Crap Box was an affront to the Skylark name. But downsizing and efficiency were the games to play, and Buick had to be ready to go — miserable Iron Duke and all.
Next up is the gorgeous, krill-seeking Skylark from about 10 years later. This new midsize sedan and coupe cribbed the styling from the Roadmaster, shrunk it 35 percent, and added a heaping helping of “sports appeal” by making it extra pointy. But hey, at least this N-body was incredibly slow. Its 2.4-liter eight-valve engine produced a shocking 120 horsepower, 40 hp less than the contemporary DOHC Quad 4 engine. By the end of this generation, however, it hosted the reliable 3.1-liter V6, and all was (relatively) fine.
This brings us all the way to near-modern times, and the Rainier model of 2004 through 2007. I happen to know that our own Chris Tonn currently runs the Rainier’s mechanically identical sister, the TrailBlazer. So, as I sat down with him virtually the other day, I gained some special insight into his experience with his ’06 4WD (now 2WD) model, which he’s owned since ’07 and driven for over 90,000 miles.Regarding the Atlas inline-six engine:“All of the fuel economy of a ’70s big block, with none of the power. 12 mpg in city driving. Around 14 on the highway. 12 mpg when towing a rusted-out racecar through West Virginia.”Regarding reliability:“Lunched a transfer case. Ignition switch is a wear item… we keep a spare in the glove box.”And finally, serviceability:“But at least the front suspension is strut based, so it’s a bitch to replace. Power steering hard lines sit in a trough over the strut tower, collecting rainwater, so the hard lines rust through. And they were the first things installed on the bare frame, so damned near everything has to come out to replace them when they rust through. Inner door panel popped off when the driver’s door shut — can’t get it to stay in place. Just a standard door shutting.”I don’t think we’re quite finished yet, because we’ve not covered the two simultaneous offerings that sat alongside the Rainier in the showroom — the Terraza “ luxury crossover sport van” and Rendezvous.
Just look at this pair. These were two U-body holdouts (hey, 1990!) that had quite a few flaws. However, their sibling was the love-it-or-hate-it Pontiac Aztek, which was arguably ahead of its time on the multi-purpose and car-based activity vehicle front, and has many fans today.So, I think my Worst Buick Ever award is still reserved for something which combines almost all the aforementioned qualities. The small stature and compromised styling of shrunken Buick models of yore. The rather ugly hatch form factor like those above. In an age of big horsepower figures, it lacks much power — just like the Malaise Skylark. A little front-wheel drive hatchback that’s masquerading as something it’s not, for the sake of fashion over true utility, luxury, dignity, or driving pleasure. And under all the tinsel applied so liberally at its South Korean manufacturing facility, it’s still an Opel Mokka.
Here’s the brand new 2017 model, which continues Buick’s signature “crappy utility vehicle” scheme of reddish paint with grey cladding. Unless the B&B can point me to a more awful Buick model my brain missed, congratulations Encore — you win.H/t to Tim Cain for today’s question idea.[Images: General Motors; Wikimedia Commons ( CC BY 2.0)]
Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 198 comments
  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Dec 22, 2016

    See? It's a Phoenix . . .risen!

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Jan 17, 2017

    A couple of thoughts... First, hat tip for the Wildcat love right off the top. Second, I always had a soft spot for the '92-'95 Skylarks; I thought the grill was reminiscent of the '65 Wildcat. Third, may I add a late nomination for the Buick Somerset? Digital dash but GM beancounters underspec'd the alternator and you know what happened next. Also, the shape of the dash was such that it had wound up with a funny bend in it as the plastic aged and deformed which looked like hell.

  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
Next