From the Pinto to Tesla, Safety Crusader Clarence Ditlow Spent a Lifetime Fighting Dangerous Cars

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Passionate automotive safety advocate and longtime Center for Auto Safety executive director Clarence Ditlow has died at age 72.

From his early work with Ralph Nader to his 40 years at CAS, Ditlow was by all accounts a shy, hard-working man who turned into an attack dog when he felt an automaker’s neglect put drivers’ safety at risk.

Since the early 1970s, Ditlow played a role in exposing glaring automotive safety concerns, sparking massive recalls in the process. During this time, Ditlow proved instrumental in seeing lemon laws passed in all 50 states, as well as upgraded road safety standards.

Still, it’s the recalls — and the damaging limelight cast on the offending automakers — that stands out the most. After taking the helm of CAS in 1976, Ditlow immediately put the heat on Ford for its fire-prone Pintos. The popular compact featured a gas tank that could rupture during rear-end collisions, and in 1978 the automaker was forced to recall 1.5 million models, sullying the brand.

Ditlow was just getting started. Over the course of the next four decades, Ditlow and his Center helped expose the dangers of GM’s side-saddle pickup truck gas tanks, Firestone tire-equipped Ford Explorers, faulty GM ignition switches, and in his final year, the potential for danger with Tesla’s Autopilot semi-autonomous driving system. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was a frequent target, as he felt the agency went too easy on automakers.

“Since the center was founded in 1970, the death rate on America’s roads has dropped dramatically, from 5.2 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1969 to 1.1 per 100 million vehicle miles in 2010,” the Center for Auto Safety said in a statement on Ditlow’s passing.

The Center continued:

Under Mr. Ditlow, the Center played a major role in these recalls, among others: 6.7 million Chevrolets for defective engine mounts, 15 million Firestone 500 tires, 1.5 million Ford Pintos for exploding gas tanks, and 3 million Evenflo child seats for defective latches.

In the past seven years alone, the Center was the primary force behind the recalls of 7 million Toyotas for sudden acceleration, 2 million Jeeps for fuel tank fires, 11 million GM vehicles for defective ignition switches, and more than 60 million faulty Takata airbag inflators.

At one of the Center’s first staff meetings, Mr. Nader made the installation of air bags a key early goal. It took approximately 20 years to accomplish it, but they are now standard in all vehicles.

While Ditlow was no less passionate about safety than his contemporary Ralph Nader, he was seen as less combative, which may have helped his ability to prod federal regulators into action.

“His surgeon loved him so much that she sat for two hours last week by his beside and sang to him,” Nader told the Los Angeles Times. “I don’t know anybody who disliked him. Of course, they disliked me.”

Ditlow died Thursday after a year-long battle with colon cancer.

[Images: Luis Alvarez/Associated Press; Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 18 comments
  • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Nov 13, 2016

    Who was more responsible for the dramatic decline in traffic fatalities, Nader, Ditlow and Claybrook, or Bela Barenyi (crush zones and safety cells), Nils Bohlin (3 point harness) and the Eaton Corp (airbags)?

    • See 2 previous
    • Johnster Johnster on Nov 14, 2016

      This was very much a joint effort. Ralph wrote and posted a column about Clarence on his website at the following link: https://blog.nader.org/2016/11/11/the-guardian-angel-for-americas-motorists/ Earlier this year when Ralph Nader was inducted into the Automotive Hall of Fame, Ralph made it clear that he had lots of help and among others he thanked the many "anonymous" Detroit insiders who leaked confidential information to him.

  • Old Man Pants Old Man Pants on Nov 13, 2016

    Oh, yoo-hoo... Admins, Meesa thinkin' I can drop the Kenmore part now, yes?

  • RHD The analyses above are on the nose.It's a hell of a good car, but the mileage is reaching the point where things that should have worn out a long time ago, and didn't, will, such as the alternator, starter, exhaust system, PS pump, and so on. The interiors tend to be the first thing to show wear, other than the tires, of course. The price is too high for a car that probably has less than a hundred thousand miles left in it without major repairs. A complete inspection is warranted, of course, and then a lower offer based on what it needs. Ten grand for any 18-year-old car is a pretty good chunk of change. It would be a very enjoyable, ride, though.
  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
  • RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
  • Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
Next