Volvo's Loss Is Audi's Gain After Automaker Poaches Itself a New Development Chief

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Audi was in the market for a new technical development chief after losing the last two to Volkswagen’s emissions-cheating scandal. This time around it wisely decided to shop outside of the company store, poaching top Volvo R&D chief Peter Mertens.

The automaker has high hopes for its growing crop of Swedish-sourced talent.

“Peter Mertens had the best combination of qualities and experience,” an Audi spokesman told Automotive News Europe.

Prior to his four years as Volvo’s senior vice president of R&D, Mertens served as head of corporate quality for Jaguar Land Rover and worked as a vehicle line executive for General Motors. He has a background in production technology and a doctorate in engineering from the University of Kaiserslautern.

In a statement, Audi CEO Rupert Stadler said, “Mertens has exceptionally broad technical expertise and an international background in the automotive industry. These are ideal qualifications for him to make further progress with the Technical Development division at Audi.”

Two of Mertens’ predecessors were removed from their positions due to potential involvement in Volkswagen Group’s violation of emissions testing regulations, making him look like a golden boy in comparison. Automotive News Europe named Mertens as one of its fourteen Eurostars this year, citing his important role in Volvo’s turnaround.

This is the German’s second big get from Volvo’s development team in the last few months. Thomas Mueller was lured away from the Swedish brand to become Audi’s head of electrics and electronics in August. Last year, Mueller’s work resulted in him being named one of the rising stars in the European automotive industry by Automotive News Europe.

Mertens and Mueller will be continuing their work together “at the earliest possible opportunity,” according to Audi.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Johnster Johnster on Nov 25, 2016

    I hope that Mertens is cashing in, and that Audi is paying through the nose for his services.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Nov 28, 2016

      He MUST be cashing in, if Audi outbid Volvo's Chinese owners. They must be getting concerned about the brain drain by now. Either that, or they're a bear to work for, and the brains know they can do better.

  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
  • FreedMike I don't think they work very well, so yeah...I'm afraid of them. And as many have pointed out, human drivers tend to be so bad that they are also worthy of being feared; that's true, but if that's the case, why add one more layer of bad drivers into the mix?
Next